Abstract
Four pigeons were trained to peck at either of two response-keys. Pecks at either key occasionally produced a secondary reinforcer, in the presence of which further pecks occasionally produced food, the primary reinforcer. All pigeons showed a consistent preference for variable (as compared to fixed) interval schedules of primary reinforcement.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa509/fa509833e1a857b5a60908af9cedde3589dcb121" alt="179"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4931/f493186a5246f04976e0918e1f0c7926835040da" alt="180"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3619/d361997c40cf85c8e8c9cebcafdf9287c8e16629" alt="181"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78c34/78c34941b437930bfe0046d0b39e1f8f7278a1e1" alt="182"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- HERRNSTEIN R. J. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:27–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds G. S. Potency of Conditioned Reinforcers Based on Food and on Food and Punishment. Science. 1963 Mar 1;139(3557):838–839. doi: 10.1126/science.139.3557.838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]