Abstract
Generalization gradients along a line-tilt continuum were obtained from groups of pigeons that had been trained to peck a key on different schedules of reinforcement. In Exp. I, gradients following training on a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) schedule proved to be much flatter than gradients following the usual 1-min variable interval (VI) training. In Exp. II, the value of the VI schedule itself was parametrically studied; Ss trained on long VI schedules (e.g., 4-min) produced much flatter gradients than Ss trained on short VI schedules (30-sec; 1-min). The results were interpreted mainly in terms of the relative control exerted by internal, proprioceptive cues on the different reinforcement schedules. Several implications of the results for other problems in the field of stimulus generalization are discussed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ANGER D. The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Sep;52(3):145–161. doi: 10.1037/h0041255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ANGER D. The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):477–506. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-s477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AZRIN N. H. Time-out from positive reinforcement. Science. 1961 Feb 10;133(3450):382–383. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3450.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BRUNER A., REVUSKY S. H. Collateral behavior in humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:349–350. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blough D. S. Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):237–246. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark F. C. The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Aug;1(3):221–228. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferster C. B., Holtzman E. P., Leckrone W. R. A response key for use with projection-type display units. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jul;5(3):322–322. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GUTTMAN N. Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:335–340. doi: 10.1037/h0045679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HABER A., KALISH H. I. PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION AFTER VARIATIONS IN SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT. Science. 1963 Oct 18;142(3590):412–413. doi: 10.1126/science.142.3590.412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HEARST E. Concurrent generalization gradients for food-controlled and shock-controlled behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jan;5:19–31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HEARST E. Simultaneous generalization gradients for appetitive and aversive behavior. Science. 1960 Dec 9;132(3441):1769–1770. doi: 10.1126/science.132.3441.1769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HISS R. H., THOMAS D. R. Stimulus generalization as a function of testing procedure and response measure. J Exp Psychol. 1963 Jun;65:587–592. doi: 10.1037/h0048117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HODOS W., ROSS G. S., BRADY J. V. Complex response patterns during temporally spaced responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:473–479. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WILSON M. P., KELLER F. S. On the selective reinforcement of spaced responses. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953 Jun;46(3):190–193. doi: 10.1037/h0057705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]