Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1964 Jan;7(1):91–96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-91

Reinforcement of drinking by running: effect of fixed ratio and reinforcement time1

David Premack, Robert W Schaeffer, Alan Hundt
PMCID: PMC1404355  PMID: 14120150

Abstract

Rats were required to complete varying numbers of licks (FR), ranging from 10 to 300, in order to free an activity wheel for predetermined times (CT) ranging from 2 to 20 sec. The reinforcement of drinking by running was shown both by an increased frequency of licking, and by changes in length of the burst of licking relative to operant-level burst length. In log-log coordinates, instrumental licking tended to be a linear increasing function of FR for the range tested, a linear decreasing function of CT for the range tested. Pause time was implicated in both of the above relations, being a generally increasing function of both FR and CT.

Full text

PDF
91

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. COLLIER G. Consummatory and instrumental responding as functions of deprivation. J Exp Psychol. 1962 Oct;64:410–414. doi: 10.1037/h0044157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FRICK F. C. The effect of anxiety; a problem in measurement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953 Apr;46(2):120–123. doi: 10.1037/h0055720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HEARST E. Resistance-to-extinction functions in the single organism. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Apr;4:133–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hulse S. H. A Precision Liquid Feeding System Controlled by Licking Behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Jan;3(1):1–3. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PREMACK D. Predicting instrumental performance from the independent rate of the contingent response. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Feb;61:163–171. doi: 10.1037/h0042090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. PREMACK D. Reversibility of the reinforcement relation. Science. 1962 Apr 20;136(3512):255–257. doi: 10.1126/science.136.3512.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. PREMACK D. Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 1959 Jul;66(4):219–233. doi: 10.1037/h0040891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SIDMAN M., STEBBINS W. C. Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Apr;47(2):114–116. doi: 10.1037/h0054127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. TEITELBAUM P., WILLIAMS D. R. Control of drinking behavior by means of an operant-conditioning technique. Science. 1956 Dec 28;124(3235):1294–1296. doi: 10.1126/science.124.3235.1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES