Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1964 Jan;7(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-1

Escape from SD associated with fixed-ratio reinforcement1

Donald M Thompson
PMCID: PMC1404380  PMID: 14120132

Abstract

Throughout ascending and descending fixed-ratio (FR) sequences, rats were allowed to terminate the FR stimulus control by pressing a time-out (TO) lever. To minimize chance or accidental responses on this second lever, three presses were required to produce the 30-sec SΔ period. As FR performance became more “strained,” there was an increased predisposition to escape from the time-in stimulus complex. The generality of this finding was extended by obtaining recoverability (independent of the direction of stimulus change) of the FR-TO function in the descending series. Typically, escapes were produced only during the post-reinforcement pause; however, under a mixed FR FR schedule, their occurrence shifted to a point within the inter-reinforcement interval corresponding to the unreinforced completion of the lower ratio component. It appears that the point where the rat can discriminate the size of the ratio requirement will be the place where TOs are imposed. This inference was supported by a substantial increase in TO frequency accompanying a shift from CRF to extinction on the FR lever. Finally, the escape lever was placed on a progressively increasing FR schedule and later extinguished to demonstrate that the TO condition was in fact reinforcing.

Full text

PDF
1

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZRIN N. H. Time-out from positive reinforcement. Science. 1961 Feb 10;133(3450):382–383. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3450.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Findley J. D. Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):123–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mechner F. Probability Relations within Response Sequences under Ratio Reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):109–121. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. PLISKOFF S., TOLLIVER G. Water-deprivation-produced sign reversal of a conditioned reinforcer based upon dry food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Oct;3:323–329. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SIDMAN M., STEBBINS W. C. Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Apr;47(2):114–116. doi: 10.1037/h0054127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES