Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1990 Apr;80(4):411–415. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.4.411

The quality of ambulatory care in Medicare health maintenance organizations.

S M Retchin 1, B Brown 1
PMCID: PMC1404568  PMID: 2107765

Abstract

The quality of ambulatory care received by Medicare recipients who enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) was compared to the care received by fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare recipients, in a quasi-experimental, non-randomized design. Both samples were drawn from the four major geographic areas in the country, and included two types of HMO practices: staff/group models, and independent practice associations (IPAs). A panel of expert physicians developed criteria for evaluating ambulatory care, and medical record abstractions using these criteria were performed on 1,590 outpatient records: 777 FFS and 813 HMO (441 staff/group, 372 IPA). While individual items of medical histories and physical examinations were performed most often for staff/group HMO patients and least often in FFS patients, odds ratios (OR) for performance in staff/group HMO patients were particularly large for health maintenance items: tonometry (OR = 8.4), mammography (OR = 2.7), pelvic examination (OR = 5.3), rectal examination (OR = 2.9), fecal occult blood test (OR = 3.3). The results suggest that recommended elements of routine and preventive care are more likely to be performed for Medicare enrollees in staff/group HMOs than in FFS settings.

Full text

PDF
411

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashcraft M., Penchansky R., Berki S. E., Fortus R. S., Gray J. Expectations and experience of HMO enrollees after one year: an analysis of satisfaction, utilization, and costs. Med Care. 1978 Jan;16(1):14–32. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197801000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brook R. H. Critical issues in the assessment of quality of care and their relationship to HMOs. J Med Educ. 1973 Apr;48(4 Suppl):114–134. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197304000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Demlo L. K., Campbell P. M., Brown S. S. Reliability of information abstracted from patients' medical records. Med Care. 1978 Dec;16(12):995–1005. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197812000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gillick M. R. The impact of health maintenance organizations on geriatric care. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Jan;106(1):139–143. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-1-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greenlick M. R., Lamb S. J., Carpenter T. M., Jr, Fischer T. S., Marks S. D., Cooper W. J. Kaiser-Permanente's Medicare Plus Project: a successful Medicare prospective payment demonstration. Health Care Financ Rev. 1983 Summer;4(4):85–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HALDANE J. B. The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies. Ann Hum Genet. 1956 May;20(4):309–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Himmelstein D. U., Woolhandler S. The corporate compromise: a Marxist view of health maintenance organizations and prospective payment. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Sep 15;109(6):494–501. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-109-6-494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Iglehart J. K. Second thoughts about HMOs for Medicare patients. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jun 4;316(23):1487–1492. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198706043162327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keller K., George E., Podell R. N. Clinical breast examination and breast self-examination experience in a family practice population. J Fam Pract. 1980 Nov;11(6):887–893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lane D. S., Fine H. L. Compliance with mammography referrals. Implications for breast cancer screening. N Y State J Med. 1983 Feb;83(2):173–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Larson E. B., Kukull W. A., Buchner D., Reifler B. V. Adverse drug reactions associated with global cognitive impairment in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Aug;107(2):169–173. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-2-169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LoGerfo J. P., Efird R. A., Diehr P. K., Richardson W. C. Rates of surgical care in prepaid group practices and the independent setting: what are the reasons for the differences? Med Care. 1979 Jan;17(1):1–10. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197901000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Monson R. A., Bond C. A. The accuracy of the medical record as an index of outpatient drug therapy. JAMA. 1978 Nov 10;240(20):2182–2184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reeder S., Berkanovic E., Marcus A. C. Breast cancer detection behavior among urban women. Public Health Rep. 1980 May-Jun;95(3):276–281. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rossiter L. F., Langwell K., Wan T. T., Rivnyak M. Patient satisfaction among elderly enrollees and disenrollees in Medicare health maintenance organizations. Results from the National Medicare Competition Evaluation. JAMA. 1989 Jul 7;262(1):57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weil P. A. Comparative costs to the Medicare program of seven prepaid group practices and controls. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1976 Summer;54(3):339–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wolinsky F. D., Marder W. D. Spending time with patients: the impact of organizational structure on medical practice. Med Care. 1982 Oct;20(10):1051–1059. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES