Skip to main content

. 1990 Apr;80(4):399–400. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.4.399

Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors.

PMCID: PMC1404580 PMID: 2316756

399

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

Angell M. Publish or perish: a proposal. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):261–262. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Davis B. D. Government and quality in science. Science. 1989 Nov 10;246(4931):736–736. doi: 10.1126/science.246.4931.736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Davis B. D. In reply: scientific integrity. Science. 1990 Jan 12;247(4939):145–146. doi: 10.1126/science.247.4939.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Huth E. J. Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):257–259. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mason J. O., Bivens L. W. Scientific integrity. Science. 1990 Jan 12;247(4939):144–146. doi: 10.1126/science.2294598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mason J. O. Office of scientific integrity. Science. 1989 May 26;244(4907):903–904. doi: 10.1126/science.2543069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Petersdorf R. G. The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Feb;104(2):252–254. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Relman A. S., Angell M. How good is peer review? N Engl J Med. 1989 Sep 21;321(12):827–829. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198909213211211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
US Public Health Service Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule. Fed Regist. 1989 Aug 8;54(151):32446–32451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yankauer A. Prior publication, an ethical issue. Am J Public Health. 1985 Apr;75(4):341–343. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.4.341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

ACTIONS

RESOURCES