Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1990 May;80(5):554–559. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.5.554

Comparative evaluation of American Cancer Society and American Lung Association smoking cessation clinics.

H A Lando 1, P G McGovern 1, F X Barrios 1, B D Etringer 1
PMCID: PMC1404660  PMID: 2327531

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of American Cancer Society, FreshStart, American Lung Association, Freedom from Smoking, and laboratory clinic methods in subjects (N = 1041) from three communities. Three-month follow-up results favored the laboratory method over the two public service approaches on both a prevalence and a sustained abstinence measure. At one-year follow-up, treatment effects for smoking prevalence were no longer significant. However, sustained abstinence results at one-year remained highly significant and favored the more intensive laboratory and Freedom from Smoking clinics over the FreshStart method. FreshStart fared less well than the other interventions both in producing initial quit attempts and in sustaining abstinence among initial quitters. It should be noted, however, that FreshStart requires considerably less facilitator contact than do the other approaches. Unexpected outcome effects occurred for treatment location. Future clinic programs should include a specific target date for quitting and should place more emphasis upon recycling participants who fail to sustain abstinence.

Full text

PDF
554

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman D. G., Flora J. A., Fortmann S. P., Farquhar J. W. The cost-effectiveness of three smoking cessation programs. Am J Public Health. 1987 Feb;77(2):162–165. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.2.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foxx R. M., Brown R. A. Nicotine fading and self-monitoring for cigarette abstinence or controlled smoking. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Spring;12(1):111–125. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lando H. A., McGovern P. G. Nicotine fading as a nonaversive alternative in a broad-spectrum treatment for eliminating smoking. Addict Behav. 1985;10(2):153–161. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(85)90021-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lando H. A. Successful treatment of smokers with a broad-spectrum behavioral approach. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1977 Jun;45(3):361–366. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.45.3.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schachter S. Recidivism and self-cure of smoking and obesity. Am Psychol. 1982 Apr;37(4):436–444. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.37.4.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES