Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1990 Mar;80(3):313–315. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.3.313

Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.

R S Stafford 1
PMCID: PMC1404683  PMID: 2305912

Abstract

This study assessed the relation between payment source and cesarean section use by analyzing California data on hospital deliveries. Of 461,066 deliveries in 1986, cesarean sections were performed in 24.4 percent. Women with private insurance had the highest cesarean section rates (29.1 percent). Successively lower rates were observed for women covered by non-Kaiser health maintenance organizations (26.8 percent), Medi-Cal (22.9 percent), Kaiser (19.7 percent), self-pay (19.3 percent), and Indigent Services (15.6 percent). Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) occurred more than twice as frequently in women covered by Kaiser (19.9 percent) and Indigent Services (24.8 percent), compared to those with private insurance (8.1 percent). Sizable, although less pronounced, associations between payment source and cesarean section use were noted for the indications of breech presentation, dystocia, and fetal distress. Accounting for maternal age and race/ethnicity did not alter these findings. Variations in the use of cesarean section have a substantial financial impact on health care payors.

Full text

PDF
313

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson G. M., Lomas J. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982. N Engl J Med. 1984 Oct 4;311(14):887–892. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198410043111405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Flamm B. L., Lim O. W., Jones C., Fallon D., Newman L. A., Mantis J. K. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: results of a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 May;158(5):1079–1084. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90224-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fraser W., Usher R. H., McLean F. H., Bossenberry C., Thomson M. E., Kramer M. S., Smith L. P., Power H. Temporal variation in rates of cesarean section for dystocia: does "convenience" play a role? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Feb;156(2):300–304. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90272-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gold R. B., Kenney A. M., Singh S. Paying for maternity care in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Sep-Oct;19(5):190–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gould J. B., Davey B., Stafford R. S. Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jul 27;321(4):233–239. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198907273210406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hornbrook M. C., Berki S. E. Practice mode and payment method. Effects on use, costs, quality, and access. Med Care. 1985 May;23(5):484–511. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198505000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kizer K. W., Ellis A. C-section rate related to payment source. Am J Public Health. 1988 Jan;78(1):96–97. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.1.96-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Myers S. A., Gleicher N. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates. N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 8;319(23):1511–1516. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812083192304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Placek P. J., Taffel S. M. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s. Am J Public Health. 1988 May;78(5):512–515. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.5.512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roemer R. The right to health care--gains and gaps. Am J Public Health. 1988 Mar;78(3):241–247. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.3.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rutkow I. M. Obstetric and gynecologic operations in the United States, 1979 to 1984. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jun;67(6):755–759. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198606000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Taffel S. M., Placek P. J., Liss T. Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise. Am J Public Health. 1987 Aug;77(8):955–959. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.8.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wennberg J., Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am. 1982 Apr;246(4):120–134. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0482-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Williams R. L., Chen P. M. Controlling the rise in cesarean section rates by the dissemination of information from vital records. Am J Public Health. 1983 Aug;73(8):863–867. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.8.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilner S., Schoenbaum S. C., Monson R. R., Winickoff R. N. A comparison of the quality of maternity care between a health-maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices. N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 26;304(13):784–787. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103263041313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Regt R. H., Minkoff H. L., Feldman J., Schwarz R. H. Relation of private or clinic care to the cesarean birth rate. N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 4;315(10):619–624. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609043151005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES