Abstract
BACKGROUND: The complete and accurate identification of fatal occupational injuries among the US work force is an important first step in developing work injury prevention efforts. Numerous sources of information, such as death certificates, Workers' Compensation files, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) files, medical examiner records, state health and labor department reports, and various combinations of these, have been used to identify cases of work-related fatal injuries. Recent studies have questioned the effectiveness of these sources for identifying such cases. METHODS: At least 10 studies have used multiple sources to define the universe of fatal work injuries within a state and to determine the capture rates, or proportion of the universe identified, by each source. Results of these studies, which are not all available in published literature, are summarized here in a format that allows researchers to readily compare the ascertainment capabilities of the sources. RESULTS: The overall average capture rates of sources were as follows: death certificates, 81%; medical examiner records, 61%; Workers' Compensation reports, 57%; and OSHA reports 32%. Variations by state and value added through the use of multiple sources are presented and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of 10 state-based studies summarizes the effectiveness of various source documents for capturing cases of fatal occupational injuries to help researchers make informed decisions when designing occupational injury surveillance systems.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker S. P., Samkoff J. S., Fisher R. S., Van Buren C. B. Fatal occupational injuries. JAMA. 1982 Aug 13;248(6):692–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bell C. A., Stout N. A., Bender T. R., Conroy C. S., Crouse W. E., Myers J. R. Fatal occupational injuries in the United States, 1980 through 1985. JAMA. 1990 Jun 13;263(22):3047–3050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy D. J., Seltzer B. L., Yesalis C. E. Comparison of two methodologies to measure agricultural occupational fatalities. Am J Public Health. 1990 Feb;80(2):198–200. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.2.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parkinson D. K., Gauss W. F., Perper J. A., Elliott S. A. Traumatic workplace deaths in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, 1983 and 1984. J Occup Med. 1986 Feb;28(2):100–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seligman P. J., Sieber W. K., Pedersen D. H., Sundin D. S., Frazier T. M. Compliance with OSHA record-keeping requirements. Am J Public Health. 1988 Sep;78(9):1218–1219. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.9.1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sniezek J. E., Horiagon T. M. Medical-examiner-reported fatal occupational injuries, North Carolina, 1978-1984. Am J Ind Med. 1989;15(6):669–678. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700150606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanbury M., Goldoft M. Use of OSHA inspections data for fatal occupational injury surveillance in New Jersey. Am J Public Health. 1990 Feb;80(2):200–202. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.2.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stout-Wiegand N. Fatal occupational injuries in US industries, 1984: comparison of two national surveillance systems. Am J Public Health. 1988 Sep;78(9):1215–1217. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.9.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suruda A., Emmett E. A. Counting recognized occupational deaths in the United States. J Occup Med. 1988 Nov;30(11):868–872. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198811000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]