Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1991 Dec;81(12):1651–1653. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1651

Patterns of breast and cervical cancer screening at three public health centers in an inner-city urban area.

S Whitman 1, D Ansell 1, L Lacey 1, E H Chen 1, N Ebie 1, J Dell 1, C W Phillips 1
PMCID: PMC1405273  PMID: 1746666

Abstract

In an effort to examine breast and cervical cancer screening patterns among poor African-American urban women, medical records were abstracted at three public health centers located in the inner city of Chicago. The proportions of eligible women at these three centers who received Pap smears, breast examinations, and mammograms were computed. These proportions were notably low and differed significantly among the three centers. Because the literature is now suggesting that an appropriate sequence best defines adequate screening, sequences of screenings were also determined and were found to be lacking. All of these screening histories fall far below the screening objectives set by the National Cancer Institute for the year 2000. This information suggests that interventions are needed that will help health centers serving poor women to deliver more frequent cancer screening.

Full text

PDF
1651

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Creasman W. T., Fowler W. C., Homesley H. D. Screening for cervical cancer: 1982--an update. N C Med J. 1982 Nov;43(11):771–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Farley T. A., Flannery J. T. Late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in women of lower socioeconomic status: public health implications. Am J Public Health. 1989 Nov;79(11):1508–1512. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fink R., Shapiro S., Roester R. Impact of efforts to increase participation in repetitive screenings for early breast cancer detection. Am J Public Health. 1972 Mar;62(3):328–336. doi: 10.2105/ajph.62.3.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hayward R. A., Shapiro M. F., Freeman H. E., Corey C. R. Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey. Arch Intern Med. 1988 May;148(5):1177–1181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Satariano W. A., Belle S. H., Swanson G. M. The severity of breast cancer at diagnosis: a comparison of age and extent of disease in black and white women. Am J Public Health. 1986 Jul;76(7):779–782. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.7.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies. JAMA. 1990 Jul 4;264(1):54–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shapiro S. The status of breast cancer screening: a quarter of a century of research. World J Surg. 1989 Jan-Feb;13(1):9–18. doi: 10.1007/BF01671148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smart C. R. Critique of the early cancer detection guidelines of the US Preventive Services Task Force and of the National Cancer Institute. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990 Jun;65(6):892–898. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62581-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tabár L., Fagerberg C. J., Gad A., Baldetorp L., Holmberg L. H., Gröntoft O., Ljungquist U., Lundström B., Månson J. C., Eklund G. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985 Apr 13;1(8433):829–832. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92204-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. van der Graaf Y., Klinkhamer P. J., Vooijs G. P. Effect of population screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Prev Med. 1986 Nov;15(6):582–590. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90063-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES