Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1991 Sep;81(9):1113–1120. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.9.1113

Adult foster care for the elderly in Oregon: a mainstream alternative to nursing homes?

R A Kane 1, R L Kane 1, L H Illston 1, J A Nyman 1, M D Finch 1
PMCID: PMC1405641  PMID: 1951820

Abstract

BACKGROUND. In Oregon, adult foster care (AFC) homes, which are private residences where a live-in manager cares for one to five disabled residents, have been covered by Medicaid since 1981 and seem to offer a mainstream alternative to nursing homes. They house almost 6000 older people, two thirds of which pay privately. METHODS. In a cross-sectional study, we interviewed 400 AFC and 400 nursing home residents. Data analyses included descriptive cross-tabulations; hierarchial loglinear models for judging the effects of care setting and payment status on resident characteristics; and logit analyses for predicting care setting and payment status within care settings. RESULTS. On average, nursing home residents were more physically and cognitively impaired than AFC residents, but there was considerable overlap in patterns of frailty in the two settings. Medicaid AFC residents were less disabled than privately paying AFC residents. AFC residents reported more social activity, even when we controlled for disability status. AFC residents and their families were more likely to value privacy and homelike settings when choosing a care setting, whereas nursing home residents were more likely to value rehabilitation and organized activity programs. CONCLUSIONS. Both AFC and nursing homes are viable components of a long-term care repertoire. The greater disability levels of private-pay AFC residents refutes the criticisms that disabled Medicaid residents were being inappropriately channeled to AFC.

Full text

PDF
1113

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Braun K. L., Rose C. L. The Hawaii geriatric foster care experiment: impact evaluation and cost analysis. Gerontologist. 1986 Oct;26(5):516–524. doi: 10.1093/geront/26.5.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mor V., Sherwood S., Gutkin C. A national study of residential care for the aged. Gerontologist. 1986 Aug;26(4):405–417. doi: 10.1093/geront/26.4.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Oktay J. S., Volland P. J. Foster home care for the frail elderly as an alternative to nursing home care: an experimental evaluation. Am J Public Health. 1987 Dec;77(12):1505–1510. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.12.1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975 Oct;23(10):433–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Thornton C., Dunstan S. M., Kemper P. The evaluation of the National Long Term Care Demonstration. 8. The effect of channeling on health and long-term care costs. Health Serv Res. 1988 Apr;23(1):129–142. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Weissert W. G., Cready C. M., Pawelak J. E. The past and future of home- and community-based long-term care. Milbank Q. 1988;66(2):309–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES