Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: While the blockade of dopamine D2 receptors are necessary for antipsychotic action, antipsychotic agents differ nearly a thousand-fold in their affinity for the D2 receptor. This affinity is determined by the rate at which the antipsychotic agent binds to (kon) and the rate at which it dissociates from (koff) the D2 receptors. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between kon, koff and the affinity (Ki) of antipsychotic agents for the D2 receptors, with particular reference to typical and atypical antipsychotic agents. DESIGN: The koff of several typical as well as atypical antipsychotic agents (nemonapride, spiperone, haloperidol, chlorpromazine, raclopride, olanzapine, sertindole, clozapine and quetiapine) was measured in vitro using the 3H-radiolabelled analogues of these drugs. The affinity of these drugs for the D2 receptor was determined by competition with 3H-raclopride in vitro. The kon was derived from values of affinity and ++koff. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: kon, koff, and the Ki of antipsychotic drugs. RESULTS: The range of affinity values was similar to that conventionally accepted (0.025-155 nmol/L). The koff values varied a thousand-fold from 0.002 to 3.013 min-1, with relatively little variation in kon. The rate at which antipsychotic agents come off the receptor (koff) accounted for 99% of the variation in their affinity for the D2 receptor; differences in kon did not account for differences in affinity. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in the affinity of antipsychotic agents are entirely determined by how fast they come off the D2 receptor. These differences in koff may lead to functionally different kinds of dopamine blockade. Drugs with a higher koff will be faster in blocking receptors, and once blocked, will provide more access to surges in dopamine transmission. Since atypical drugs show a lower affinity and a faster dissociation, a higher koff for the D2 receptor is proposed as a mechanism for "atypical" antipsychotic effect.
Full text
PDF





Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Affolter H., Hertel C., Jaeggi K., Portenier M., Staehelin M. (-)-S-[3H]CGP-12177 and its use to determine the rate constants of unlabeled beta-adrenergic antagonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Feb;82(3):925–929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.3.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bellows E. P., Barnes D. E., Csernansky J. G. Estimation of haloperidol concentrations in rat striatum after chronic treatment. Brain Res Bull. 1991 May;26(5):715–719. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(91)90165-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng Y., Prusoff W. H. Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol. 1973 Dec 1;22(23):3099–3108. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cunningham V. J., Hume S. P., Price G. R., Ahier R. G., Cremer J. E., Jones A. K. Compartmental analysis of diprenorphine binding to opiate receptors in the rat in vivo and its comparison with equilibrium data in vitro. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991 Jan;11(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farde L., Eriksson L., Blomquist G., Halldin C. Kinetic analysis of central [11C]raclopride binding to D2-dopamine receptors studied by PET--a comparison to the equilibrium analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1989 Oct;9(5):696–708. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1989.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grandy D. K., Marchionni M. A., Makam H., Stofko R. E., Alfano M., Frothingham L., Fischer J. B., Burke-Howie K. J., Bunzow J. R., Server A. C. Cloning of the cDNA and gene for a human D2 dopamine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):9762–9766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawagoe K. T., Garris P. A., Wiedemann D. J., Wightman R. M. Regulation of transient dopamine concentration gradients in the microenvironment surrounding nerve terminals in the rat striatum. Neuroscience. 1992 Nov;51(1):55–64. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90470-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meltzer H. Y., Matsubara S., Lee J. C. Classification of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on the basis of dopamine D-1, D-2 and serotonin2 pKi values. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989 Oct;251(1):238–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schotte A., Janssen P. F., Gommeren W., Luyten W. H., Van Gompel P., Lesage A. S., De Loore K., Leysen J. E. Risperidone compared with new and reference antipsychotic drugs: in vitro and in vivo receptor binding. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1996 Mar;124(1-2):57–73. doi: 10.1007/BF02245606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seeman P., Lee T., Chau-Wong M., Wong K. Antipsychotic drug doses and neuroleptic/dopamine receptors. Nature. 1976 Jun 24;261(5562):717–719. doi: 10.1038/261717a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seeman P., Tallerico T. Antipsychotic drugs which elicit little or no parkinsonism bind more loosely than dopamine to brain D2 receptors, yet occupy high levels of these receptors. Mol Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;3(2):123–134. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seeman P., Tallerico T. Rapid release of antipsychotic drugs from dopamine D2 receptors: an explanation for low receptor occupancy and early clinical relapse upon withdrawal of clozapine or quetiapine. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;156(6):876–884. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seeman P., Van Tol H. H. Deriving the therapeutic concentrations for clozapine and haloperidol: the apparent dissociation constant of a neuroleptic at the dopamine D2 or D4 receptor varies with the affinity of the competing radioligand. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995 Oct 15;291(2):59–66. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(95)90125-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Votaw J. R., Kessler R. M., de Paulis T. Failure of the three compartment model to describe the pharmacokinetics in brain of a high affinity substituted benzamide. Synapse. 1993 Nov;15(3):177–190. doi: 10.1002/syn.890150303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
