Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1967 Apr;12(4):411–416.

Contributions to the study of Salmonella

II. Protein determinants shared by S. typhi, S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium

Cella Barber, I R Vlǎdoianu, Gh Dimache
PMCID: PMC1409206  PMID: 4960714

Abstract

The antigenic relationship between S. typhi and S. enteritidis, that at present are known to share only the polysaccharide factors 9 and 12, has been investigated with a view to confirming the existence of common protein O specificity.

A serum to S. enteritidis absorbed with the polysaccharide of S. typhi O-901 and a serum to S. enteritidis in which the polysaccharide antibodies were present in extremely small amounts (undetectable in agar diffusion tests) precipitated with extracts containing proteins of S. typhi.

Additional evidence of the existence of common protein O factors was obtained by precipitin tests in agar in which sera to proteins from S. typhi reacted with proteins of S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium (whose H determinants differ from one another); the precipitations of heterologous proteins in agar-gel varied in intensity according to the antibody content of the antiprotein sera tested and to the proportion of O determinants of the respective protein. Heterologous precipitin reactions of the sera to S. enteritidis with antigens from S. typhi were stronger than those with the homologous antigen, whereas the antigens from S. enteritidis were but weakly precipitated by the sera to S. typhi.

This appears to indicate an intrinsically higher antigenic potency of S. typhi, compared with S. enteritidis.

Full text

PDF
411

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADA G. L., NOSSAL G. J., PYE J., ABBOT A. ANTIGENS IN IMMUNITY. I. PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF FLAGELLAR ANTIGENS FROM SALMONELLA ADELAIDE. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:267–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barber C., Taga S. Contribution à l'étude des antigènes des staphylocoques. 3. Variations quantitatives et qualitatives des antigènes de souches appartenant à des lysotypes différents. Modifications qualitatives et quantitatives des antigènes d'une même souche. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1965 Oct;109(4):487–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barber C., Vladoianu I. R., Dimache G. Contributions to the study of Salmonella. Immunological specificity of proteins separated from Salmonella typhi. Immunology. 1966 Oct;11(4):287–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KAWAKAMI M., OSAWA N., MITSUHASHI S. EXPERIMENTAL SALMONELLOSIS. III. NEW TOXIC FRACTION (L) OBTAINED FROM SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS AND ITS IMMUNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES. J Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86:872–879. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.872-879.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MILNER K. C., ANACKER R. L., FUKUSHI K., HASKINS W. T., LANDY M., MALMGREN B., RIBI E. SYMPOSIUM ON RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE OF MICROORGANISMS TO THEIR IMMUNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES. III. STRUCTURE AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF SURFACE ANTIGENS FROM GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA. Bacteriol Rev. 1963 Dec;27:352–368. doi: 10.1128/br.27.4.352-368.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. OLITZKI A. L., GODINGER D. INTER-FAMILIAR ANTIGENIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ENTEROBACTERIACEAE, BRUCELLACEAE AND PSEUDOMONADACEAE REVEALED BY THE AGAR GEL PRECIPITATION TECHNIQUE. Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1963 May-Jun;42:213–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rhodes M. E. Flagellation as a criterion for the classification of bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1965 Dec;29(4):442–465. doi: 10.1128/br.29.4.442-465.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WHITESIDE R. E., BAKER E. E. Antigenic analysis of Salmonella typhosa and related salmonellas. J Immunol. 1962 May;88:650–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES