Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1997 Nov;47(424):739–742.

Communication about risk--dilemmas for general practitioners. The Department of General Practice Working Group, University of Wales College of Medicine.

A Edwards 1, L Prior 1
PMCID: PMC1409935  PMID: 9519524

Abstract

Measures of risk frequently contribute to our understanding, prevention, or treatment of disease, but it is important that general practitioners (GPs) explain clinical risks effectively to patients to ensure they are not misunderstood, as risk information can assist in decision-making processes and encourage behavioural change. However, the interpretation of risks by patients and doctors varies. It is argued that problems arise because communication about risk is usually framed in terms of the language of chance or probability. In this paper, we describe how probability theory developed, and suggest that attempts to communicate empirical risk processes in probabilistic language are bound to produce dilemmas. We explore how the theory relates to clinical practice and identify key issues that doctors must address in discussing risk with individual patients.

Full text

PDF
739

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Asscher A. W., Parr G. D., Whitmarsh V. B. Towards the safer use of medicines. BMJ. 1995 Oct 14;311(7011):1003–1006. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7011.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryant G. D., Norman G. R. Expressions of probability: words and numbers. N Engl J Med. 1980 Feb 14;302(7):411–411. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198002143020718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bucher H. C., Weinbacher M., Gyr K. Influence of method of reporting study results on decision of physicians to prescribe drugs to lower cholesterol concentration. BMJ. 1994 Sep 24;309(6957):761–764. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6957.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calman K. C. Cancer: science and society and the communication of risk. BMJ. 1996 Sep 28;313(7060):799–802. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7060.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohn L. D., Schydlower M., Foley J., Copeland R. L. Adolescents' misinterpretation of health risk probability expressions. Pediatrics. 1995 May;95(5):713–716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fallowfield L. J., Hall A., Maguire P., Baum M., A'Hern R. P. Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer. BMJ. 1994 Aug 13;309(6952):448–448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6952.448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Freedman L. Bayesian statistical methods. BMJ. 1996 Sep 7;313(7057):569–570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7057.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Glanz K., Yang H. Communicating about risk of infectious diseases. JAMA. 1996 Jan 17;275(3):253–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haynes R. B. Some problems in applying evidence in clinical practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:210–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26350.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacobson L. D., Edwards A. G., Granier S. K., Butler C. C. Evidence-based medicine and general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jul;47(420):449–452. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones E. F., Beniger J. R., Westoff C. F. Pill and IUD discontinuation in the United States, 1970-1975: the influence of the media. Fam Plann Perspect. 1980 Nov-Dec;12(6):293–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kalet A., Roberts J. C., Fletcher R. How do physicians talk with their patients about risks? J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Jul;9(7):402–404. doi: 10.1007/BF02629523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lilford R. J., Braunholtz D. The statistical basis of public policy: a paradigm shift is overdue. BMJ. 1996 Sep 7;313(7057):603–607. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7057.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Logan R. L., Scott P. J. Uncertainty in clinical practice: implications for quality and costs of health care. Lancet. 1996 Mar 2;347(9001):595–598. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91284-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marteau T. M. Psychological costs of screening. BMJ. 1989 Aug 26;299(6698):527–527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6698.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marteau T., Drake H., Bobrow M. Counselling following diagnosis of a fetal abnormality: the differing approaches of obstetricians, clinical geneticists, and genetic nurses. J Med Genet. 1994 Nov;31(11):864–867. doi: 10.1136/jmg.31.11.864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mazur D. J., Hickam D. H. Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;5(5):402–405. doi: 10.1007/BF02599425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McPherson K. Third generation oral contraception and venous thromboembolism. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):68–69. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Skolbekken J. A. The risk epidemic in medical journals. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Feb;40(3):291–305. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00262-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stott N. C., Pill R. M. 'Advise yes, dictate no'. Patients' views on health promotion in the consultation. Fam Pract. 1990 Jun;7(2):125–131. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.2.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES