Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1997 Nov;47(424):733–737.

A systematic review of empirical research into ethics in general practice.

W A Rogers 1
PMCID: PMC1409958  PMID: 9519523

Abstract

Much of the bioethical literature addresses the problems of tertiary medicine, with little attention to the daily concerns of general practitioners (GPs). The present review assesses the current state of research into the range and nature of ethical issues for GPs, looking specifically at the content of the research, the methods employed, and the philosophical framework of the research. A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Sociofile identified nine articles which form the basis for this review. The majority of the research reviewed here is quantitative in nature, using hypothetical cases with closed questions and categorical responses. No consistently significant variables were identified. Decisions appear to be inconsistent in terms of theoretical models and moral psychology. Ethical issues of concern to GPs differed from those commonly reported in the bioethical literature. There is a paucity of research into the ethical concerns of general practice. The existing body of research is quantitative in nature, leaving many unanswered questions concerning the reasons behind the decisions of GPs. There is a need for qualitative studies to further our understanding of this area.

Full text

PDF
733

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brody B. A. Quality of scholarship in bioethics. J Med Philos. 1990 Apr;15(2):161–178. doi: 10.1093/jmp/15.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brody H. Empirical studies of ethics in family medicine. J Fam Pract. 1983 Jun;16(6):1061–1063. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Christie R. J., Freer C., Hoffmaster C. B., Stewart M. A. Ethical decision making by British general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Nov;39(328):448–451. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christie R. J., Hoffmaster C. B., Bass M. J., McCracken E. C. How family physicians approach ethical problems. J Fam Pract. 1983 Jun;16(6):1133–1138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Christie R. J., Hoffmaster C. B., Stewart M. A. Ethical decision making by Canadian family physicians. CMAJ. 1987 Nov 15;137(10):891–897. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis D. S. Rich cases. The ethics of thick description. Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Jul-Aug;21(4):12–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dayringer R., Paiva R. E., Davidson G. W. Ethical decision making by family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1983 Aug;17(2):267–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dickman R. L. Family medicine and medical ethics--a natural and necessary union. J Fam Pract. 1980 Apr;10(4):633–637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Doyle P. The ethical dilemmas of general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 1994 Jun;23(6):1028-9, 1032. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunn J. W., Shaw R. W. Medical ethics: a survey of general practitioners' attitudes. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Dec;33(257):763–767. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Epstein R. M., Christie M., Frankel R., Rousseau S., Shields C., Williams G., Suchman A. L. Primary care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The physician's perspective. Arch Fam Med. 1993 Feb;2(2):159–167. doi: 10.1001/archfami.2.2.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoffmaster B. The forms and limits of medical ethics. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Nov;39(9):1155–1164. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90348-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoffmaster C. B., Stewart M. A., Christie R. J. A survey method for investigating ethical decision making in family practice. Fam Med. 1992 Aug;24(6):433–438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoffmaster C. B., Stewart M. A., Christie R. J. Ethical decision making by family doctors in Canada, Britain and the United States. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(6):647–653. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Knabe B. J., Stearns J. A., Glasser M. Medical students' understanding of ethical issues in the ambulatory setting. Fam Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;26(7):442–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lako C. J., Huygen F. J., Lindenthal J. J., Persoon J. M. Handling of confidentiality in general practice: a survey among general practitioners in The Netherlands. Fam Pract. 1990 Mar;7(1):34–38. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mabeck C. E. Confidentiality in general practice. Fam Pract. 1985 Dec;2(4):199–204. doi: 10.1093/fampra/2.4.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pellegrino E. D. Balancing head, heart, and hand in the physician's education: a special task for family practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1988 Jan-Mar;1(1):4–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pellegrino E. D. The metamorphosis of medical ethics. A 30-year retrospective. JAMA. 1993 Mar 3;269(9):1158–1162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Robillard H. M., High D. M., Sebastian J. G., Pisaneschi J. I., Perritt L. J., Mahler D. M. Ethical issues in primary health care: a survey of practitioners' perceptions. J Community Health. 1989 Spring;14(1):9–17. doi: 10.1007/BF01324436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Secundy M. G. Ethical dilemmas in office practice: physician response and rationale. J Natl Med Assoc. 1985 Dec;77(12):999–1007. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stevens N. G., McCormick T. R. Bringing the special perspective of the family physician to the teaching of clinical ethics. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1994 Jan-Feb;7(1):38–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ventres W., Nichter M., Reed R., Frankel R. Do-not-resuscitate discussions: a qualitative analysis. Fam Pract Res J. 1992 Jun;12(2):157–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES