Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1998 Jun;48(431):1307–1311.

Improving general practitioner clinical records with a quality assurance minimal intervention.

C B Del Mar 1, J B Lowe 1, P Adkins 1, E Arnold 1, P Baade 1
PMCID: PMC1410140  PMID: 9747547

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although good medical records have been associated with good care, there is considerable room for their improvement in general practice. AIM: To improve the quality of general practice medical records at minimal cost. METHOD: A total of 150 randomly sampled general practitioners (GPs) in suburban Brisbane, Australia, were randomized in a controlled trial to receive or not receive an intervention. The intervention consisted of 6 to 12 one-hour monthly meetings when the pairs of GPs assessed samples of each other's medical records using a 12-item instrument. This was developed previously by a process of consensus of general practice teachers. Mean scores of 10 medical records selected at random from before the intervention started and one year later were compared. RESULTS: After the intervention, the increase in the total score (for which the maximum possible was 18) for the intervention GPs (from a baseline of 11.5 to 12.3) was not significantly greater than for the controls (from 11.4 to 11.7). Legibility and being able to determine the doctor's assessment of the consultation were significantly improved. The post-intervention increase of 1.06 (9.3%) of the total scores of the 47% of intervention GPs who complied with the intervention was significantly greater than that for the controls. CONCLUSION: The quality assurance activity improved some components of the quality of GPs' clinical records. However, the improvement was small, and the search for activities for Australian GPs that demonstrate an improvement in the quality of their practice must continue.

Full text

PDF
1307

Images in this article

1311p1311-a
on p.1311

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Britt H., Meza R. A., Del Mar C. Methodology of morbidity and treatment data collection in general practice in Australia: a comparison of two methods. Fam Pract. 1996 Oct;13(5):462–467. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.5.462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crotty M., Litt J. C., Ramsay A. T., Jacobs S., Weller D. P. Will facilitators be acceptable in Australian general practice? A before and after feasibility study. Aust Fam Physician. 1993 Sep;22(9):1643–1647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Curtis P. Medical audit in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1974 Sep;24(146):607–611. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Curtis P., Skinner B., Bentz E., Purvis A. Inside the chart review. J Med Educ. 1982 Nov;57(11):841–847. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198211000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawes K. S. Survey of general practice records. Br Med J. 1972 Jul 22;3(5820):219–223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5820.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Del Mar C., Lowe J. B., Adkins P., Arnold E. What is the quality of general practitioner records in Australia? Aust Fam Physician. 1996 Jan;Suppl 1:S21–S25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Del Mar C. Quality assurance and general practice in Australia. Aust Clin Rev. 1991;11(1-2):41–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dunn E. V., Bass M. J., Williams J. I., Borgiel A. E., MacDonald P., Spasoff R. A. Study of relation of continuing medical education to quality of family physicians' care. J Med Educ. 1988 Oct;63(10):775–784. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198810000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fessel W. J., Van Brunt E. E. Assessing quality of care from the medical record. N Engl J Med. 1972 Jan 20;286(3):134–138. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197201202860305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kamien M., Sampson S. How accurate are medical records in detecting patient problems? Aust Fam Physician. 1984 Oct;13(10):738–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kern D. E., Harris W. L., Boekeloo B. O., Barker L. R., Hogeland P. Use of an outpatient medical record audit to achieve educational objectives: changes in residents' performances over six years. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 May-Jun;5(3):218–224. doi: 10.1007/BF02600538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lyons T. F., Payne B. C. The relationship of physicians' medical recording performance to their medical care performance. Med Care. 1974 Aug;12(8):714–720. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197408000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maxwell J. A., Sandlow L. J., Bashook P. G. Effect of a medical care evaluation program on physician knowledge and performance. J Med Educ. 1984 Jan;59(1):33–38. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198401000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Njølstad I., Aaraas I., Lundevall S. Look at the patient, not the notes. Lancet. 1992 Aug 15;340(8816):413–414. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91482-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peppiatt R. Records and prevention for the beginner. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Oct;33(255):660–661. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Perry J. R., Caine N. General practitioners' knowledge about patients and use of medical records in out of hours calls. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 May;40(334):190–193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. ROSENFELD L. S. Quality of medical care in hospitals. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1957 Jul;47(7):856–865. doi: 10.2105/ajph.47.7.856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ward J. General practitioners' experience of research. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):418–423. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weed L. L. Quality control and the medical record. Arch Intern Med. 1971 Jan;127(1):101–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zuckerman Z. E., Starfield B., Hochreiter C., Kovasznay B. Validating the content of pediatric outpatient medical records by means of tape-recording doctor-patient encounters. Pediatrics. 1975 Sep;56(3):407–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES