Abstract
There is no evidence to support the practice of screening consultations that include general physical examinations and batteries of tests; however, many patients may choose, or be sent by their employers, to have private full health screening (FHS). General practitioners (GPs) are routinely sent the results of these screening examinations and are expected to deal with any subsequent care required. GPs recognize some positive aspects of FHS, but in our survey there was a groundswell of dislike for these examinations because of uncertainty about patient benefit (raised anxiety or false assurance) and a potential to irritate the GP. The implications for workload were minimal but resented. GPs would welcome a precise summary of significant findings and for the screening doctor to take greater responsibility for follow-up.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Frame P. S., Carlson S. J. A critical review of periodic health screening using specific screening criteria. Part 1: Selected diseases of respiratory, cardiovascular, and central nervous systems. J Fam Pract. 1975 Feb;2(1):29–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kottke T. E., Battista R. N., DeFriese G. H., Brekke M. L. Attributes of successful smoking cessation interventions in medical practice. A meta-analysis of 39 controlled trials. JAMA. 1988 May 20;259(19):2883–2889. doi: 10.1001/jama.259.19.2883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kristenson H., Ohlin H., Hultén-Nosslin M. B., Trell E., Hood B. Identification and intervention of heavy drinking in middle-aged men: results and follow-up of 24-60 months of long-term study with randomized controls. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1983 Spring;7(2):203–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1983.tb05441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]