Abstract
In the United Kingdom (UK), advance directives have recently received considerable attention from professional and voluntary organizations as well as medical journals and the media. However, despite such exposure, many doctors remain uncertain of the importance or relevance of advance directives with regard to their own clinical practice. This paper addresses these uncertainties by first explaining what advance directives are and then describing the current legal status of such directives in the UK. Examination of the cases underpinning this status reveals several key elements: competence, information, anticipation, applicability, and freedom from duress. Each is discussed. Although this paper focuses on legal issues, it is important that medical law does not dominate medical ethics. Accordingly, the paper also discusses some important philosophical and sociological considerations that have remained largely unexplored in the medical press. Finally, the paper deals with practical matters, including how the general practitioner might be involved.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Clouser K. D., Gert B. A critique of principlism. J Med Philos. 1990 Apr;15(2):219–236. doi: 10.1093/jmp/15.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis R. B. The principlism debate: a critical overview. J Med Philos. 1995 Feb;20(1):85–105. doi: 10.1093/jmp/20.1.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doyal L. Advance directives. BMJ. 1995 Mar 11;310(6980):612–613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6980.612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dresser R., Whitehouse P. J. The incompetent patient on the slippery slope. Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 Jul-Aug;24(4):6–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):184–188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardy P. J. Advance directives. Approved guidelines are now required. BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1604–1604. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1604c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kessel A. S. On failing to understand informed consent. Br J Hosp Med. 1994 Sep 7;52(5):235–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kessel Anthony S., Crawford Michael J. Openness with patients: a categorical imperative to correct an imbalance. Sci Eng Ethics. 1997 Jul;3(3):297–304. doi: 10.1007/s11948-997-0036-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kopelman L. M. Informed consent and anonymous tissue samples: the case of HIV seroprevalence studies. J Med Philos. 1994 Dec;19(6):525–552. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.6.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loewy Erich H., Ulrich Lawrence P., Bedolla Miguel, Tucker Robin Terrell, McCabe Melvina. Furthering the dialogue on advance directives and the Patient Self-Determination Act. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Summer;3(3):405–421. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100005247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lustig B. A. The method of 'principlism': a critique of the critique. J Med Philos. 1992 Oct;17(5):487–510. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.5.487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson G. S. Making an advance directive. BMJ. 1995 Jan 28;310(6974):236–238. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6974.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singer P. A. Disease-specific advance directives. Lancet. 1994 Aug 27;344(8922):594–596. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91971-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sommerville A. Remembrance of conversations past: oral advance statements about medical treatment. BMJ. 1995 Jun 24;310(6995):1663–1665. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6995.1663a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Virmani J., Schneiderman L. J., Kaplan R. M. Relationship of advance directives to physician-patient communication. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Apr 25;154(8):909–913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]