Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1998 May;48(430):1253–1257.

General practice fundholding: progress to date.

R D Smith 1, P Wilton 1
PMCID: PMC1410181  PMID: 9692288

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cornerstone of the National Health Service (NHS) reforms was the establishment of an internal market, which separated purchasing and providing roles. As purchasers of care, general practice fundholders were seen as a pivotal part of the 'new patient-led NHS', which was intended to lead to improved cost-containment and cost-effectiveness, quality of care, and patient choice and empowerment. AIM: To review published evidence of the extent to which these objectives may have been achieved over the past six years. METHOD: Keyword search of on-line databases (MEDLINE and Econ-lit) from 1990 to 1996, plus manual search of references within those articles identified. RESULTS: In the absence of any formal evaluation of fundholding, it is difficult to assess the overall success of this reform. However, in terms of cost-containment and cost-effectiveness, there is mixed evidence. In some areas, such as prescribing, the evidence suggests cost-savings, although the evidence is less clear on reductions or changes in referrals. There is also evidence that suggests that improvements in prescribing may have been achieved at substantial additional administration and transaction costs. With respect to quality of care, the evidence suggests that, although quality in the procedural aspects of health provision has improved, there is little evidence about how health outcomes may have been affected. In terms of patient choice and empowerment, the evidence suggests that, whilst general practitioner choice of secondary providers has improved, little progress has been made with regard to increased consumer choice. CONCLUSION: Evidence concerning the success or otherwise of general practice fundholding over the past six years is incomplete and mixed. The major deficiency concerns any effect on health outcomes that may be the result of fundholding. Until such research is conducted, the jury will have to remain out on whether fundholding has secured improved efficiency in the delivery of health care.

Full text

PDF
1253

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bain J. Fundholding: a two tier system? BMJ. 1994 Aug 6;309(6951):396–399. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6951.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowie C., Harris T. The fundholding fandango. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):38–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradlow J., Coulter A. Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing schemes on general practitioners' prescribing costs. BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradlow J., Coulter A. Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing schemes on general practitioners' prescribing costs. BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cairns J. Contracts: problems and prospects. Health Policy. 1993 Sep;25(1-2):127–140. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(93)90107-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Capewell S. The continuing rise in emergency admissions. BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):991–992. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7037.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Corney R. Experiences of first wave general practice fundholders in South East Thames Regional Health Authority. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):34–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Corney R. Experiences of first wave general practice fundholders in South East Thames Regional Health Authority. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):34–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coulter A. Fundholding general practices. BMJ. 1992 Feb 15;304(6824):397–398. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6824.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Coulter A. General practice fundholding: time for a cool appraisal. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Mar;45(392):119–120. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crump B. J., Panton R., Drummond M. F., Marchment M., Hawkes R. A. Transferring the costs of expensive treatments from secondary to primary care. BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):509–512. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6978.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dixon J., Glennerster H. What do we known about fundholding in general practice? BMJ. 1995 Sep 16;311(7007):727–730. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7007.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dowell J. S., Snadden D., Dunbar J. A. Changing to generic formulary: how one fundholding practice reduced prescribing costs. BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):505–508. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6978.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dowling B. Effect of fundholding on waiting times: database study. BMJ. 1997 Aug 2;315(7103):290–292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7103.290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Drummond M. The United Kingdom National Health Service reforms: where are we now? Aust Health Rev. 1995;18(1):28–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellsbury K. E. Can the family physician avoid conflict of interest in the gatekeeper role? An affirmative view. J Fam Pract. 1989 Jun;28(6):698–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamley J. H., MacGregor S. H., Dunbar J. A., Cromarty J. A. Integrating clinical pharmacists into the primary health care team: a framework for rational and cost-effective prescribing. Scott Med J. 1997 Feb;42(1):4–7. doi: 10.1177/003693309704200102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Howie J. G., Heaney D. J., Maxwell M. The chief scientist reports ... Evaluation of the Scottish shadow fund-holding project: first results. Health Bull (Edinb) 1993 Mar;51(2):94–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Keeley D. General practice fundholding and health care costs. BMJ. 1997 Jul 19;315(7101):139–139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7101.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kirkup B., Donaldson L. J. Is health care a commodity: how will purchasing improve the National Health Service? J Public Health Med. 1994 Sep;16(3):256–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kronick R., Goodman D. C., Wennberg J., Wagner E. The marketplace in health care reform. The demographic limitations of managed competition. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 14;328(2):148–152. doi: 10.1056/nejm199301143280225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Macgregor S. H., Hamley J. G., Dunbar J. A., Dodd T. R., Cromarty J. A. Evaluation of a primary care anticoagulant clinic managed by a pharmacist. BMJ. 1996 Mar 2;312(7030):560–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7030.560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Malcolm L. General practitioner fundholding: experimental sideshow or main event of the NHS reforms? N Z Med J. 1993 May 12;106(955):183–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Maxwell M., Heaney D., Howie J. G., Noble S. General practice fundholding: observations on prescribing patterns and costs using the defined daily dose method. BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1190–1194. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maxwell R. Gatekeepers and goalkeepers: general practice advice to purchasers. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Nov;42(364):450–451. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Maynard A. Can competition enhance efficiency in health care? Lessons from the reform of the U.K. national health service. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Nov;39(10):1438–1445. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90238-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Newton J., Hayes V., Hutchinson A. Factors influencing general practitioners' referral decisions. Fam Pract. 1991 Dec;8(4):308–313. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.4.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Petchey R. General practitioner fundholding: weighing the evidence. Lancet. 1995 Oct 28;346(8983):1139–1142. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91805-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pritchard D. A., Beilby J. J. Issues for fundholding in Australian general practice. Med J Aust. 1996 Feb 19;164(4):215–219. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb94141.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rafferty T., Wilson-Davis K., McGavock H. How has fundholding in Northern Ireland affected prescribing patterns? A longitudinal study. BMJ. 1997 Jul 19;315(7101):166–170. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7101.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith C. H., Armstrong D. Comparison of criteria derived by government and patients for evaluating general practitioner services. BMJ. 1989 Aug 19;299(6697):494–496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6697.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Steven I. D., Douglas R. M. Dissatisfaction in general practice: what do patients really want? Med J Aust. 1988 Mar 21;148(6):280–282. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb117835.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Surender R., Bradlow J., Coulter A., Doll H., Brown S. S. Prospective study of trends in referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region, 1990-4. BMJ. 1995 Nov 4;311(7014):1205–1208. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7014.1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas K., Nicholl J., Coleman P. Assessing the outcome of making it easier for patients to change general practitioner: practice characteristics associated with patient movements. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Nov;45(400):581–586. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Whynes D. K., Reed G. Fundholders' referral patterns and perceptions of service quality in hospital provision of elective general surgery. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Dec;44(389):557–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilson R. P., Buchan I., Walley T. Alterations in prescribing by general practitioner fundholders: an observational study. BMJ. 1995 Nov 18;311(7016):1347–1350. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7016.1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Woodward A., Wilson S. Managed competition in the British NHS. More than the health service sending bills to itself? Med J Aust. 1994 Apr 18;160(8):465–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. van de Ven W. P. Market-oriented health care reforms: trends and future options. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Sep;43(5):655–666. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(96)00111-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES