Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1998 May;48(430):1237–1240.

Does good practice organization improve the outcome of care for diabetic patients?

N Dunn 1, R Pickering 1
PMCID: PMC1410185  PMID: 9692282

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Audit of diabetic care is becoming common in general practice. Most of this audit is concerned with structure and process; outcome audit is much more difficult to achieve. AIM: To determine whether the structure of general practice diabetic care influenced the process or outcome and whether efficiency of process predicted improved outcome. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey, by questionnaire and review of notes, among general practices in the East Dorset district, involving diabetic patients identified from general practitioner (GP) disease registers or from a hospital diabetic register. The main outcome measures were the proportion of process and outcome measurements, related to selected structure criteria and the proportion of outcome measurements, related to appropriate process measurements. All associations were tested using the practice as the unit of analysis. RESULTS: Practices with a detailed diabetic register showed a positive association with a higher proportion of some process, but no outcome, measurements compared to those practices without such a registrar. A high proportion of process measurements did not correlate with improved outcome. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the follow-up of diabetic patients in general practice by measurement of the structure or process of care does not allow the prediction of an improved outcome for those patients when summarized on a practice basis. There is no shortcut to the collection of data on outcome as a measure of the benefit of follow-up for diabetic patients.

Full text

PDF
1237

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alberti K. G., Gries F. A. Management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Europe: a concensus view. Diabet Med. 1988 Apr;5(3):275–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1988.tb00984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dunn N. R., Bough P. Standards of care of diabetic patients in a typical English community. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jul;46(408):401–405. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gatling W., Howie A. J., Hill R. D. An optical practice based diabetic eye screening programme. Diabet Med. 1995 Jun;12(6):531–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00536.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hill R. D. Community care service for diabetics in the Poole area. Br Med J. 1976 May 8;1(6018):1137–1139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6018.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones J. N., Marsden P. Improved diabetes care in a UK health district. Diabet Med. 1992 Mar;9(2):176–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1992.tb01755.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pringle M., Stewart-Evans C., Coupland C., Williams I., Allison S., Sterland J. Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care? BMJ. 1993 Mar 6;306(6878):630–634. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6878.630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES