Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1998 May;48(430):1241–1243.

A pilot study exploring the effect of discharging cancer survivors from hospital follow-up on the workload of general practitioners.

I Chait 1, R Glynne-Jones 1, S Thomas 1
PMCID: PMC1410188  PMID: 9692283

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The tradition of routine, long-term follow-up of cancer patients in the outpatient clinic has led to busy clinics and long waiting times. Many cancer patients are anxious and have become dependent on the specialist clinic for reassurance. General practitioners (GPs) have been shown to be willing to assume greater responsibility for the routine follow-up of breast cancer patients, but patients have demonstrated a preference for hospital follow-up. If patients are discharged unwillingly, their rehabilitation may be at the cost of an increased demand on GP practices. AIM: To determine the consequences for GPs of discharging long-term cancer patients from a hospital outpatient follow-up clinic. METHOD: A consecutive sample of 65 patients under annual review in a hospital oncology clinic were offered a planned discharge in which their return to the clinic, if necessary, was guaranteed. The 41 patients who accepted discharge were monitored. Anxiety and depression rates were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at the time of discharge and four months later at a home interview. The GPs of all patients who were discharged were sent questionnaires four and twelve months after discharge to evaluate consultation rates and change in psychological morbidity. RESULTS: The results showed no significant increase in the consultation rates during the 12 months after discharge compared with the previous 12 months. There was no significant change in the level of patients' anxiety or depression at four months after discharge. The great majority of GPs (71%) reported no change in their perception of patients' levels of anxiety or depression. GPs thought there was a need for more specialist Macmillan nurses working in the community and highlighted the importance of fast-track specialist referral. CONCLUSION: Discharging this group of long-term cancer survivors did not increase the workload of GPs. However, GPs' concern over the lack of availability of Macmillan nurses in the community suggests that primary care services may find it difficult to cope adequately with the special requirements involved in cancer patient care. Finally, there is a need to address the further training requirements of GPs in the routine follow-up of cancer patients.

Full text

PDF
1241

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Camuñas J., Enriquez J. M., Devesa J. M., Morales V., Millan I. Value of follow-up in the management of recurrent colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1991 Oct;17(5):530–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cochrane J. P., Williams J. T., Faber R. G., Slack W. W. Value of outpatient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel. Br Med J. 1980 Mar 1;280(6214):593–595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6214.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dewar J. A., Kerr G. R. Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Nov 23;291(6507):1464–1467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6507.1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Glynne-Jones R., Chait I., Thomas S. F. When and how to discharge cancer survivors in long term remission from follow-up: the effectiveness of a contract. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1997;9(1):25–29. doi: 10.1016/s0936-6555(97)80055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grunfeld E., Mant D., Vessey M. P., Fitzpatrick R. Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice. Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;12(1):60–65. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holli K., Hakama M. Effectiveness of routine and spontaneous follow-up visits for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989 Feb;25(2):251–254. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(89)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators. JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1587–1592. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03510440047031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones R., Lamont T., Haines A. Setting priorities for research and development in the NHS: a case study on the interface between primary and secondary care. BMJ. 1995 Oct 21;311(7012):1076–1080. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maher E. J. Non-surgical management of early breast cancer in the United Kingdom: follow-up. Clinical Audit Sub-committee of the Faculty of Clinical Oncology, Royal College of Radiologists, and the Joint Council for Clinical Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1995;7(4):227–231. doi: 10.1016/s0936-6555(05)80605-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maher J., Bradburn J., Adewuyi-Dalton R. Follow up in breast cancer. Patients prefer specialist follow up. BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):54–54. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.54a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marsh G. N. Are follow-up consultations at medical outpatient departments futile? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Apr 17;284(6323):1176–1177. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6323.1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morris S., Corder A. P., Taylor I. What are the benefits of routine breast cancer follow-up? Postgrad Med J. 1992 Nov;68(805):904–907. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.68.805.904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Murphy E., Kinmonth A. L., Marteau T. General practice based diabetes surveillance: the views of patients. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Jul;42(360):279–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ohlsson B., Breland U., Ekberg H., Graffner H., Tranberg K. G. Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Jun;38(6):619–626. doi: 10.1007/BF02054122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosselli Del Turco M., Palli D., Cariddi A., Ciatto S., Pacini P., Distante V. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1593–1597. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.20.1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Snee M. Routine follow-up of breast cancer patients. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1994;6(3):154–156. doi: 10.1016/s0936-6555(94)80053-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sullivan F. M., Hoare T., Gilmour H. Outpatient clinic referrals and their outcome. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Mar;42(356):111–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Damme R., Drummond N., Beattie J., Douglas G. Integrated care for patients with asthma: views of general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):9–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Welch-McCaffrey D., Hoffman B., Leigh S. A., Loescher L. J., Meyskens F. L., Jr Surviving adult cancers. Part 2: Psychosocial implications. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Sep 15;111(6):517–524. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-6-517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES