Skip to main content
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1976 Nov;17(11):895–899. doi: 10.1136/gut.17.11.895

Analysis of the effects of food and of digestive secretions on the small intestine of the rat. 1. Mucosal morphology and epithelial replacement.

R M Clarke, R Ecknauer, G Feyerabend
PMCID: PMC1411213  PMID: 1001979

Abstract

A modified Roux-en-Y repositioning of rat small intestine was performed so that the proximal segment of bowel (A) received only bile and pancreastic secretions, the second (B) received food direct from the stomach, and these two segments drained into a third (C). Four to five weeks after operation, cell production was assessed by injection of vincristine into operated, sham-operated and unoperated rats, and counts of blocked metaphases were made on isolated microdissected crypts. Villus height, crypt depth, and the number of crypts per villus (crypt/villus ratio) were also measured. Most of segment A showed no significant differences from sham-operated intestine, although the normal proximo-distal gradient of villus height was abolished. At the distal end (near the anastomosis with segments B and C), crypt depth and cell production were increased. The villus height gradient in segment B was also abolished, although crypt depth and cell production were significantly increased, especially at the proximal end. Crypt/villus ratio was also increased. Segment C showed all the characteristics of small bowel promoted to a more proximal position: increased villus height, crypt depth and cell production. Increased crypt/villus ratio was also observed. These results are discussed in terms of the role of food and of digestive secretions in the control of mucosal morphology and epithelial replacement.

Full text

PDF
895

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altmann G. G., Leblond C. P. Factors influencing villus size in the small intestine of adult rats as revealed by transposition of intestinal segments. Am J Anat. 1970 Jan;127(1):15–36. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001270104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CREAMER B. SMALL-INTESTINAL MUCOSAL DYNAMICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT. Br Med J. 1964 Nov 28;2(5421):1373–1375. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5421.1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark R. M. Evidence for both luminal and systemic factors in the control of rat intestinal epithelial replacement. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1976 Feb;50(2):139–144. doi: 10.1042/cs0500139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarke R. M. Control of intestinal epithelial replacement: lack of evidence for a tissue-specific blood-borne factor. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1974 May;7(3):241–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1974.tb00904.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarke R. M. The effect of growth and of fasting on the number of villi and crypts in the small intestine of the albino rat. J Anat. 1972 May;112(Pt 1):27–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dowling R. H., Booth C. C. Structural and functional changes following small intestinal resection in the rat. Clin Sci. 1967 Feb;32(1):139–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forrester J. M. The number of villi in rat's jejunum and ileum: effect of normal growth, partial enterectomy, and tube feeding. J Anat. 1972 Feb;111(Pt 2):283–291. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gleeson M. H., Cullen J., Dowling R. H. Intestinal structure and function after small bowel by-pass in the rat. Clin Sci. 1972 Dec;43(6):731–742. doi: 10.1042/cs0430731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanson W. R., Osborne J. W. Epithelial cell kinetics in the small intestine of the rat 60 days after resection of 70 per cent of the ileum and jejunum. Gastroenterology. 1971 Jun;60(6):1087–1097. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levin R. J. The effects of hormones on the absorptive, metabolic and digestive functions of the small intestine. J Endocrinol. 1969 Oct;45(2):315–348. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0450315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Philipson B. Morphology in the cat ileal mucosa following construction of an ileal reservoir or transposition of patches to different locations. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(4):369–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. TOWNLEY R. R., CASS M. H., ANDERSON C. M. SMALL INTESTINAL MUCOSAL PATTERNS OF COELIAC DISEASE AND IDIOPATHIC STEATORRHOEA SEEN IN OTHER SITUATIONS. Gut. 1964 Feb;5:51–55. doi: 10.1136/gut.5.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES