Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1976 Aug;17(8):645–651. doi: 10.1136/gut.17.8.645

Measurement of anal pressure and motility.

B D Hancock
PMCID: PMC1411317  PMID: 976803

Abstract

A fine open perfused system and a closed balloon system for the measurement of anal pressure and motility have been compared. Measurements were made in 40 normal subjects and 84 patients with haemorrhoids. The rate of perfusion had a marked effect on the recorded pressure and motility details. The motility pattern was seen most clearly with the balloon probe and the pressure recorded was reproducible and easy to measure, making this a convenient method for recording activity of the internal anal sphincter. Anal motility in normal subjects was characterised by slow pressure waves (10-20/min). The frequency was fastest in the distal anal canal and this frequency gradient may represent a normal mechanism to keep the anal canal empty. Ultra slow pressure waves (0-6-1-9/min) were seen in 42% of patients with haemorrhoids and 5% of normal subjects and arose from a synchronous contraction of the whole internal sphincter.

Full text

PDF
645

Images in this article

646Fig. 1
on p.646

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Collins C. D., Brown B. H., Whittaker G. E., Duthie H. L. New method of measuring forces in the anal canal. Gut. 1969 Feb;10(2):160–163. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.2.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DUTHIE H. L., WATTS J. M. CONTRIBUTION OF THE EXTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTER TO THE PRESSURE ZONE IN THE ANAL CANAL. Gut. 1965 Feb;6:64–68. doi: 10.1136/gut.6.1.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Duthie H. L., Kwong N. K., Brown B. Adaptability of the anal canal to distension. Br J Surg. 1970 May;57(5):388–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HARRIS L. D., POPE C. E., 2nd "SQUEEZE" VS. RESISTANCE: AN EVALUATION OF THE MECHANISM OF SPHINCTER COMPETENCE. J Clin Invest. 1964 Dec;43:2272–2278. doi: 10.1172/JCI105101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HILL J. R., KELLEY M. L., Jr, SCHLEGEL J. F., CODE C. F. Pressure profile of the rectum and anus of healthy persons. Dis Colon Rectum. 1960 May-Jun;3:203–209. doi: 10.1007/BF02616555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hancock B. D., Smith K. The internal sphincter and Lord's procedure for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg. 1975 Oct;62(10):833–836. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800621021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Howard E. R., Nixon H. H. Internal anal sphincter. Observations on development and mechanism of inhibitory responses in premature infants and children with Hirschprung's disease. Arch Dis Child. 1968 Oct;43(231):569–578. doi: 10.1136/adc.43.231.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lawson J. O., Nixon H. H. Anal canal pressures in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg. 1967 Dec;2(6):544–552. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(67)80011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Phillips S. F., Edwards D. A. Some aspects of anal continence and defaecation. Gut. 1965 Aug;6(4):396–406. doi: 10.1136/gut.6.4.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SCHUSTER M. M., HENDRIX T. R., MENDELOFF A. I. The internal anal sphincter response: manometric studies on its normal physiology, neural pathways, and alteration in bowel disorders. J Clin Invest. 1963 Feb;42:196–207. doi: 10.1172/JCI104706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wankling W. J., Brown B. H., Collins C. D., Duthie H. L. Basal electrical activity in the anal canal in man. Gut. 1968 Aug;9(4):457–460. doi: 10.1136/gut.9.4.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES