Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1978 May;19(5):414–418. doi: 10.1136/gut.19.5.414

Effect of cimetidine on ion fluxes and potential difference across the human stomach

K J Ivey, P A Mackercher
PMCID: PMC1412101  PMID: 26626

Abstract

The H2-receptor antagonist, cimetidine, reduces acid output regardless of the means of stimulation. It is not known in man whether this is due entirely to a reduction in acid secretion or whether increased back diffusion of hydrogen ions is also occurring. We studied fluxes of H+, Na+, K+, and Cl− ions after acid instillation into the human stomach in six healthy subjects with and without prior administration of 300 mg cimetidine orally. Potential difference across gastric mucosa was measured continuously throughout each study. Cimetidine caused a significant reduction in hydrogen ion secretion (5·05 mEq per 15 minutes controls versus 2·70 cimetidine, p < 0·05), and consequently a significant reduction in net hydrogen flux into the gastric lumen (2·01 mEq per 15 minutes versus 0·02, p < 0·05). There were no significant differences between sodium ion fluxes in control and cimetidine studies, suggesting that the gastric mucosal barrier remained intact. Cimetidine alone caused a highly significant rise in intragastric pH (to 7) and of potential difference (p < 0·001). Addition of intragastric acid (pH < 1·0) did not reverse the rise in potential difference caused by cimetidine, suggesting that factors other than change in intragastric pH were involved. In conclusion, our studies support the concept that reduction in acid output by cimetidine is due to inhibition of acid secretion, and not to increased permeability to hydrogen ion.

Full text

PDF
414

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson S., Grossman M. I. Profile of pH, pressure, and potential difference at gastroduodenal junction in man. Gastroenterology. 1965 Oct;49(4):364–371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baskin W. N., Ivey K. J., Krause W. J., Jeffrey G. E., Gemmell R. T. Aspirin-induced ultrastructural changes in human gastric mucosa: correlation with potential difference. Ann Intern Med. 1976 Sep;85(3):299–303. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-85-3-299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowen J. C., Kuo Y. J., Pawlik W., Williams D., Shanbour L. L., Jacobson E. D. Electrophysiological effects of burimamide and 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 on the canine gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology. 1975 Jun;68(6):1480–1484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CODE C. F., HIGGINS J. A., MOLL J. C., ORVIS A. L., SCHOLER J. F. The influence of acid on the gastric absorption of water, sodium and potassium. J Physiol. 1963 Apr;166:110–119. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chapman M. A., Werther J. L., Janowitz H. D. Response of the normal and pathological human gastric mucosa to an instilled acid load. Gastroenterology. 1968 Sep;55(3):344–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chvasta T. E., Cooke A. R. The effect of several ulcerogenic drugs on the canine gastric mucosal barrier. J Lab Clin Med. 1972 Feb;79(2):302–315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fromm D., Silen M., Robertson R. Histamine effects on H+ permeability by isolated gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology. 1976 Jun;70(6):1076–1081. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOLLANDER F. Gastric secretion of electrolytes. Fed Proc. 1952 Sep;11(3):706–714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUNT J. N. The secretory pattern of the stomach of man. J Physiol. 1951 Apr;113(2-3):169–184. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ivey K. J., Baskin W., Jeffrey G. Effect of cimetidine on gastric potential difference in man. Lancet. 1975 Nov 29;2(7944):1072–1073. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)90435-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ivey K. J., Clifton J. A. Ionic movement across the gastric mucosa of man: reproducibility and effect of intravenous atropine. J Lab Clin Med. 1971 Nov;78(5):753–764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ivey K. J. Gastric mucosal barrier. Gastroenterology. 1971 Aug;61(2):247–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ivey K. J., Schedl H. P. Gastric nonabsorbable indicators for studies in man. Gastroenterology. 1970 Aug;59(2):234–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ivey K. J., Settree P. Effect of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on gastric ionic fluxes and potential difference in man. Gut. 1976 Nov;17(11):916–919. doi: 10.1136/gut.17.11.916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kenyon G., Carter D. C. Proceedings: The effect of the histamine H2-receptor on canine gastric mucosal barrier. Gut. 1976 May;17(5):388–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MacKercher P. A., Ivey K. J., Baskin W. N., Krause W. J. Protective effect of cimetidine on aspirin-induced gastric mucosal damage. Ann Intern Med. 1977 Dec;87(6):676–679. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-87-6-676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. O'Brien P. E., Carter D. C. Effect of gastric secretory inhibitors on the gastric mucosal barrier. Gut. 1975 Jun;16(6):437–442. doi: 10.1136/gut.16.6.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. REITEMEIER R. J., CODE C. F., ORVIS A. L. Barrier offered by gastric mucosa of healthy persons to absorption of sodium. J Appl Physiol. 1957 Mar;10(2):261–266. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1957.10.2.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rees W. D., Rhodes J., Wheeler M. H., Meek M. E., Newcombe R. G. Proceedings: Role of histamine receptors in the pathophysiology of gastric mucosal damage. Gut. 1976 May;17(5):388–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Safaie-Shirazi S., Foster L. D., Hardy B. M. The effect of metiamide, an H2-receptor antagonist, in the prevention of experimental stress ulcers. Gastroenterology. 1976 Sep;71(3):421–425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Thjodleifsson B., Wormsley K. G. Effects of metiamide on the human stomach. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1975 Nov;49(5):445–458. doi: 10.1042/cs0490445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES