Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1985 Mar 9;290(6470):750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6470.750

Ultrasound in first trimester shows no difference in fetal size between the sexes.

A Selbing, K McKay
PMCID: PMC1418532  PMID: 3918740

Full text

PDF

Page 750

750

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Pedersen J. F. Ultrasound evidence of sexual difference in fetal size in first trimester. Br Med J. 1980 Nov 8;281(6250):1253–1253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6250.1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Persson P. H., Grennert L., Gennser G. Impact of fetal and maternal factors on the normal growth of the biparietal diameter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1978;78:21–27. doi: 10.3109/00016347809162698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Robinson H. P., Fleming J. E. A critical evaluation of sonar "crown-rump length" measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975 Sep;82(9):702–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Selbing A., Fjällbrant B. Accuracy of conceptual age estimation from fetal crown-rump length. J Clin Ultrasound. 1984 Jul-Aug;12(6):343–346. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870120606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Thomson A. M., Billewicz W. Z., Hytten F. E. The assessment of fetal growth. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968 Sep;75(9):903–916. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1968.tb01615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES