Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1980 Nov-Dec;95(6):540–548.

Trends in cesarean section rates for the United States, 1970--78.

P J Placek, S M Taffel
PMCID: PMC1422801  PMID: 7433601

Abstract

With National Hospital Discharge Survey data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics as a basis, rates of cesarean section deliveries were computed for the United States and its regions for 1970 through 1978. For each year and within each region, trends were examined according to variations in the mother's color, age, and marital status and in the hospital size (number of beds), the form of hospital ownership, and the length of the mother's hospital stay. Within each region and for each variable considered, cesarean section deliveries rose fairly uniformly. Nationally, C-sections comprised 5.5 percent of all deliveries in 1970, but rose steadily to comprise 15.2 percent of all deliveries in 1978. Overall, 1978 rates were highest in the Northeast, among whites, among women age 30 and over, among married women, in hospitals with 500 beds or more, and in proprietary hospitals. The mean length of the mother's hospital stay in 1978 was 6.7 days for cesarean section deliveries and 3.2 days for other deliveries, down from the mean hospital stay of 7.8 days for C-sections and 3.9 days for other deliveries observed in 1970.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baskett T. F. Cesarean section: what is an acceptable rate? Can Med Assoc J. 1978 May 6;118(9):1019–1020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bottoms S. F., Rosen M. G., Sokol R. J. The increase in the cesarean birth rate. N Engl J Med. 1980 Mar 6;302(10):559–563. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198003063021006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hobbins J. C., Freeman R., Queenan J. T. The fetal monitoring debate. Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jul;54(1):103–109. doi: 10.1097/00006250-197907000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Paul R. H., Huey J. R., Jr, Yaeger C. F. Clinical fetal monitoring: its effect on cesarean section rate and perinatal mortality: five-year trends. Postgrad Med. 1977 Apr;61(4):160–166. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1977.11714552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Petitti D., Olson R. O., Williams R. L. Cesarean section in California--1960 through 1975. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Feb 15;133(4):391–397. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams R. L., Hawes W. E. Cesarean section, fetal monitoring, and perinatal mortality in California. Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):864–870. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES