Skip to main content
PMC home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1973 Mar;24(3):477–492.

Studies on the control of antibody synthesis

III. Changes in heterogeneity of antibody affinity during the course of the immune response

T P Werblin, Young Tai Kim, F Quagliata, G W Siskind
PMCID: PMC1422981  PMID: 4574576

Abstract

The distribution and heterogeneity of antibody affinity has been followed with time after immunization. Initially, a symmetrical distribution of heterogeneous low affinity antibody molecules is present. With time the population becomes skewed towards the high affinity end of the distribution, the average affinity increases, and the bulk of the antibody generally comes to be present in a subpopulation of high affinity and of relatively restricted heterogeneity. Still later after immunization, the proportion of high affinity antibody decreases and a highly heterogeneous population of antibody molecules is present with a somewhat decreased average affinity. Low affinity subpopulations were found to persist throughout the course of the immune response. In addition it was noted that by day 42 after immunization a significant amount of the highest affinity antibody that a given rabbit would synthesize at any time during its immune response was already present. Thus, changes in average affinity can be accounted for by shifts in the relative amounts of those antibody subpopulations already present by day 42 and do not require the appearance of any new antibody species. The results can be interpreted as consistent with a selection theory of antibody synthesis in which cells of high affinity are preferentially selected in what amounts to a micro-evolutionary system.

Full text

PDF
477

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson B. Studies on the regulation of avidity at the level of the single antibody-forming cell. The effect of antigen dose and time after immunization. J Exp Med. 1970 Jul 1;132(1):77–88. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenneman L., Singer S. J. The generation of antihapten antibodies with electrophoretically homogeneous L chains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 May;60(1):258–264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.1.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davie J. M., Paul W. E. Receptors on immunocompetent cells. IV. Direct measurement of avidity of cell receptors and cooperative binding of multivalent ligands. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):643–659. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.3.643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davie J. M., Paul W. E. Receptors on immunocompetent cells. V. Cellular correlates of the "maturation" of the immune response. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):660–674. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.3.660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. EISEN H. N., KERN M., NEWTON W. T., HELMREICH E. A study of the distribution of 2,4-dinitrobenzene sensitizers between isolated lymph node cells and extracellular medium in relation to induction of contact skin sensitivity. J Exp Med. 1959 Aug 1;110(2):187–206. doi: 10.1084/jem.110.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. EISEN H. N., SISKIND G. W. VARIATIONS IN AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. Biochemistry. 1964 Jul;3:996–1008. doi: 10.1021/bi00895a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisen H. N. Learning and memory in the immune response. Cancer Res. 1966 Sep;26(9):2005–2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FARR R. S. A quantitative immunochemical measure of the primary interaction between I BSA and antibody. J Infect Dis. 1958 Nov-Dec;103(3):239–262. doi: 10.1093/infdis/103.3.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goidl E. A., Paul W. E., Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. The effect of antigen dose and time after immunization on the amount and affinity of anti-hapten antibody. J Immunol. 1968 Feb;100(2):371–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kitagawa M., Grossberg A. L., Yagi Y., Pressman D. Separation of antibodies into fractions with different binding properties. Immunochemistry. 1967 May;4(3):157–167. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(67)90125-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. NISONOFF A., PRESSMAN D. Heterogeneity and average combining constants of antibodies from individual rabbits. J Immunol. 1958 Jun;80(6):417–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. Cell selection by antigen in the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1969;10:1–50. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60414-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stupp Y., Yoshida T., Paul W. E. Determination of antibody-hapten equilibrium constants by an ammonium sulfate precipitation technique. J Immunol. 1969 Sep;103(3):625–627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Werblin T. P., Siskind G. W. Distribution of antibody affinities: technique of measurement. Immunochemistry. 1972 Oct;9(10):987–1011. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(72)90110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES