Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1973 Feb;24(2):289–301.

Regulation of the immune response

VI. Inability of F(ab′)2 antibody to terminate established immune responses and its ability to interfere with IgG antibody-mediated immunosuppression

P L Chan, N R StC Sinclair
PMCID: PMC1423010  PMID: 4576780

Abstract

Intact IgG antibody can terminate established immune responses, whereas F(ab′)2 antibody cannot do so. The difference between the two antibodies appears to be qualitative. F(ab′)2 antibody, but not pepsin-digested normal serum, can interfere with the suppression and termination of immune responses induced by intact IgG antibody. These results are discussed in terms of the tripartite inactivation model.

Full text

PDF
289

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson B., Wigzell H. Studies on antibody avidity at the cellular level. Effects of immunological paralysis and administered antibody. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Nov;1(5):384–390. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azar M. M., Good R. A. The inhibitory effect of vitamin A on complement levels and tolerance production. J Immunol. 1971 Jan;106(1):241–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Azar M. M., Yunis E. J., Pickering P. J., Good R. A. On the nature of immunological tolerance. Lancet. 1968 Jun 15;1(7555):1279–1281. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92293-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker P. J., Stashak P. W., Amsbaugh D. F., Prescott B., Barth R. F. Evidence for the existence of two functionally distinct types of cells which regulate the antibody response to type 3 pneumococcal polysaccharide. J Immunol. 1970 Dec;105(6):1581–1583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Basten A., Miller J. F., Sprent J., Pye J. A receptor for antibody on B lymphocytes. I. Method of detection and functional significance. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):610–626. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.3.610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Basten A., Warner N. L., Mandel T. A receptor for antibody on B lymphocytes. II. Immunochemical and electron microscopy characteristics. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):627–642. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.3.627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berken A., Benacerraf B. Properties of antibodies cytophilic for macrophages. J Exp Med. 1966 Jan 1;123(1):119–144. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.1.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bianco C., Nussenzweig V. Theta-bearing and complement-receptor lymphocytes are distinct populations of cells. Science. 1971 Jul 9;173(3992):154–156. doi: 10.1126/science.173.3992.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Borek F., Battisto J. R. Specific immunologic unresponsiveness induced in adult guinea pigs with the aid of p-azobenzenearsonate hapten coupled to autologous red cells. J Immunol. 1971 Mar;106(3):877–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chan P. L., Sinclair N. R. Regulation of the immune response. V. An analysis of the function of the Fc portion of antibody in suppression of an immune response with respect to interaction with components of the lymphoid system. Immunology. 1971 Dec;21(6):967–981. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DAVIDSOHN I., MASAITIS L., STERN K. Experimental studies on Rh immunization. Am J Clin Pathol. 1956 Aug;26(8):833–843. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/26.8.833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Diener E., Feldmann M. Antibody-mediated suppression of the immune response in vitro. II. A new approach to the phenomenon of immunological tolerance. J Exp Med. 1970 Jul 1;132(1):31–43. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dukor P., Bianco C., Nussenzweig V. Tissue localization of lymphocytes bearing a membrane receptor for antigen-antibody-complement complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Oct;67(2):991–997. doi: 10.1073/pnas.67.2.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feldmann M., Diener E. Antibody-mediated suppression of the immune response in vitro. I. Evidence for a central effect. J Exp Med. 1970 Feb;131(2):247–274. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.2.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gershon R. K., Kondo K. Cell interactions in the induction of tolerance: the role of thymic lymphocytes. Immunology. 1970 May;18(5):723–737. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goidl E. A., Paul W. E., Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. The effect of antigen dose and time after immunization on the amount and affinity of anti-hapten antibody. J Immunol. 1968 Feb;100(2):371–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Greenbury C. L., Moore D. H. Non-specific antibody-induced suppression of the immune response. Nature. 1968 Aug 3;219(5153):526–527. doi: 10.1038/219526a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamaoka T., Kitagawa M. Antibody production in mice. II. The mechanism of antigenic stimulation in the secondary immune response. Immunology. 1971 Feb;20(2):191–203. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haughton G., Nash D. R. Specific immunosuppression by minute doses of passive antibody. Transplant Proc. 1969 Mar;1(1):616–618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Henney C. S., Ishizaka K. Studies on the immunogenicity of antigen-antibody precipitates. 1. The suppressive effect of anti-L and anti-H chain antibodies on the immunogenicity of human gammaG globulin. J Immunol. 1968 Nov;101(5):896–904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Henney C. S., Ishizaka K. Studies on the immunogenicity of antigen-antibody precipitates. II. The suppressive effect of anti-carrier and anti-hapten antibodies on the immunogenicity of dinitrophenylated human gamma G globulin. J Immunol. 1970 Jun;104(6):1540–1549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Henry C., Jerne N. K. Competition of 19S and 7S antigen receptors in the regulation of the primary immune response. J Exp Med. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):133–152. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Irvin G. L., 3rd, Eustace J. C., Fahey J. L. Inhancement activity of mouse immunoglobulin classes. J Immunol. 1967 Dec;99(6):1085–1091. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Iványi J. Cytophilic antibodies in passive aibody induced immune suppression or enhancement. Nature. 1970 May 9;226(5245):550–551. doi: 10.1038/226550b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Iványi J. Early 7S antibody--antigen complexes with affinity to spleen cells in chickens immunized with a low dose of human serum albumin. Immunology. 1970 Oct;19(4):629–635. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. MOLLER G., WIGZELL H. ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL. ANTIBODY-INDUCED SUPPRESSION OF 19S AND 7S ANTIBODY RESPONSE. J Exp Med. 1965 Jun 1;121:969–989. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.6.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McConahey P. J., Cerottini J. C., Dixon F. J. An approach to the quantitation of immunogenic antigen. J Exp Med. 1968 May 1;127(5):1003–1011. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.5.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller J. F., Dukor P., Grant G., Sinclair N. R., Sacquet E. The immunological responsiveness of germ-free mice thymectomized at birth. I. Antibody production and skin homograft rejection. Clin Exp Immunol. 1967 Sep;2(5):531–542. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mitchell G. F., Grumet F. C., McDevitt H. O. Genetic control of the immune response. The effect of thymectomy on the primary and secondary antibody response of mice to poly-L(tyr, glu)-poly-D, L-ala--poly-L-lys. J Exp Med. 1972 Jan;135(1):126–135. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mollison P. L., Hughes-Jones N. C. Clearance of Rh-positive red cells by low concentrations of Rh antibody. Immunology. 1967 Jan;12(1):63–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Murgita R. A., Tokuda S. The specific suppression of the early immune response in mice by "slow" and "fast" migrating 7S mouse antibody fractions. Life Sci. 1967 Oct 15;6(20):2185–2189. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(67)90241-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Murgita R. A., Vas S. I. Specific antibody-mediated effect on the immune response. Suppression and augmentation of the primary immune response in mice by different classes of antibodies. Immunology. 1972 Mar;22(3):319–331. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Möller G. Regulation of cellular antibody synthesis. Cellular 7S production and longevity of 7S antigen-sensitive cells in the absence of antibody feedback. J Exp Med. 1968 Feb 1;127(2):291–306. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.2.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. NELSON R. A., Jr The immune-adherence phenomenon; an immunologically specific reaction between microorganisms and erythrocytes leading to enhanced phagocytosis. Science. 1953 Dec 18;118(3077):733–737. doi: 10.1126/science.118.3077.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. NISONOFF A., WISSLER F. C., LIPMAN L. N., WOERNLEY D. L. Separation of univalent fragments from the bivalent rabbit antibody molecule by reduction of disulfide bonds. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1960 Aug;89:230–244. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(60)90049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nicholas R., Sinclair S. C. Regulation of the immune response. I. Reduction in ability of specific antibody to inhibit long-lasting IgG immunological priming after removal of the Fc fragment. J Exp Med. 1969 Jun 1;129(6):1183–1201. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.6.1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Okumura K., Tada T. Regulation of homocytotropic antibody formation in the rat. 3. Effect of thymectomy and splenectomy. J Immunol. 1971 Apr;106(4):1019–1025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Paraskevas F., Lee S. T., Orr K. B., Israels L. G. A receptor for Fc on mouse B-lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1972 May;108(5):1319–1327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Paul W. E., Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. Specificity of cellular immune responses. Antigen concentration dependence of stimulation of DNA synthesis in vitro by specifically sensitized cells, as an expression of the binding characteristics of cellular antibody. J Exp Med. 1968 Jan 1;127(1):25–42. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pincus C. S., Lamm M. E., Nussenzweig V. Regulation of the immune response: suppressive and enhancing effects of passively administered antibody. J Exp Med. 1971 May 1;133(5):987–1003. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.5.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ptak W., Pryjma J. Cytophilic antibody and the regulation of the immune response. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Nov;1(5):408–410. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sinclair N. R. A comparison of primary and secondary haemolysin responses to sheep erythrocytes in neonatally thymectomized, sham-thymectomized and normal Swiss mice. A time-course study of total, 19S and 7S antibody. Immunology. 1967 May;12(5):559–564. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sinclair N. R., Chan P. L. Relationship between antibody-mediated immunosuppression and tolerance induction. Nature. 1971 Nov 12;234(5324):104–105. doi: 10.1038/234104a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sinclair N. R. Delayed development of primary immunological responsiveness in neonatally thymectomized swiss albino mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 1967 Nov;2(6):701–704. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sinclair N. R. Effects of neonatal thymectomy on the haemolysin response to sheep erythrocytes in Swiss albino mice. A time-course study of total, 19S and 7S antibody. Immunology. 1967 May;12(5):549–557. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sinclair N. R., Lees R. K., Chan P. L., Khan R. H. Regulation of the immune response. II. Further studies on differences in ability of F(ab')2 and 7S antibodies to inhibit an antibody response. Immunology. 1970 Jul;19(1):105–116. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sinclair N. R., Lees R. K., Elliott E. V. Role of the Fc fragment in the regulation of the primary immune response. Nature. 1968 Dec 7;220(5171):1048–1049. doi: 10.1038/2201048a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sinclair N. R. Time-course studies on antibody response in thymectomized and sham-thymectomized mice. Nature. 1965 Dec 11;208(5015):1104–1105. doi: 10.1038/2081104a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. Cell selection by antigen in the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1969;10:1–50. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60414-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Siskind G. W., Dunn P., Walker J. G. Studies on the control of antibody synthesis. II. Effect of antigen dose and of suppression by passive antibody on the affinity of antibody synthesized. J Exp Med. 1968 Jan 1;127(1):55–66. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Takasugi M., Hildemann W. H. Regulation of immunity toward allogeneic tumors in mice. I. Effect of antiserum fractions on tumor growth. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1969 Oct;43(4):843–856. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Taylor R. B., Wortis H. H. Thymus dependence of antibody response: variation with dose of antigen and class of antibody. Nature. 1968 Nov 30;220(5170):927–928. doi: 10.1038/220927a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Theis G. A., Green I., Benacerraf B., Siskind G. W. A study of immunologic tolerance in the dinitrophenyl poly-l-lysine immune system. J Immunol. 1969 Feb;102(2):513–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Theis G. A., Siskind G. W. Selection of cell populations in induction of tolerance: affinity of antibody formed in partially tolerant rabbits. J Immunol. 1968 Jan;100(1):138–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. UHR J. W., BAUMANN J. B. Antibody formation. I. The suppression of antibody formation by passively administered antibody. J Exp Med. 1961 May 1;113:935–957. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.5.935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Voisin G. A., Kinsky R., Jansen F., Bernard C. Biological properties of antibody classes in transplantation immune sera. Transplantation. 1969 Nov;8(5):618–632. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196911000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES