Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1963 Jan;6(1):30–36.

Antibody Responses after Successive Injections of Related Antigens

R V Gilden
PMCID: PMC1423187  PMID: 13947846

Abstract

The response of serologically mature fowls to antigens having varying degrees of relationship to a previously injected antigen was studied by quantitative precipitin methods and absorption analyses. After successive injections with related antigens three major antibody populations were detected: (1) antibodies reacting only with the second antigen, equivalent in amount to those obtained in a primary response to that antigen; (2) antibodies reacting only with the first antigen, lower in amount than those obtained during a primary response to that antigen; and (3) antibodies reacting with both antigens, in much greater amount than after successive injections with a single antigen.

Successive immunization with unrelated antigens did not result in the formation of antibodies capable of reacting with the primary antigen.

Full text

PDF
30

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABRAMOFF P., WOLFE H. R. Specificity of anamnestic response in chickens. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1959 Jun;101(2):391–394. doi: 10.3181/00379727-101-24954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer D. C., Stavitsky A. B. ON THE DIFFERENT MOLECULAR FORMS OF ANTIBODY SYNTHESIZED BY RABBITS DURING THE EARLY RESPONSE TO A SINGLE INJECTION OF PROTEIN AND CELLULAR ANTIGENS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1961 Oct;47(10):1667–1680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.47.10.1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DAVENPORT F. M., HENNESSY A. V. A serologic recapitulation of past experiences with influenza A; antibody response to monovalent vaccine. J Exp Med. 1956 Jul 1;104(1):85–97. doi: 10.1084/jem.104.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DIXON F. J., MAURER P. H. Specificity of the secondary response to protein antigens. J Immunol. 1955 Jun;74(6):418–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FARR R. S. A quantitative immunochemical measure of the primary interaction between I BSA and antibody. J Infect Dis. 1958 Nov-Dec;103(3):239–262. doi: 10.1093/infdis/103.3.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GARVEY J. S., CAMPBELL D. H. The retention of S35-labelled bovine serum albumin in normal and immunized rabbit liver tissue. J Exp Med. 1957 Apr 1;105(4):361–372. doi: 10.1084/jem.105.4.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GOODMAN M., WOLFE H. R., NORTON S. Precipitin production in chickens. VI. The effect of varying concentrations of NaCl on precipitate formation. J Immunol. 1951 Feb;66(2):225–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. WEIGLE W. O. Immunochemical properties of the cross-reactions between anti-BSA and heterologous albumins. J Immunol. 1961 Nov;87:599–607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES