Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 1983 Jun;15(6):715–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb01555.x

A comparison of once daily atenolol and metoprolol SA in mild to moderate hypertension.

C A Morley, C Cavalcanti, E J Perrins, R Sutton
PMCID: PMC1427914  PMID: 6347229

Abstract

Atenolol 100 mg once daily and metoprolol SA 200 mg once daily were compared in 20 patients with mild to moderate hypertension, in a randomised, double-blind cross-over trial. Blood pressure and heart rate were compared at rest and during maximal exercise on a bicycle ergometer at 2 and 24 h post-dose. Blood pressure control was similar with both drugs, except at 2 h when systolic blood pressure was significantly lower with atenolol. Blood pressure and heart rate were less well controlled at 24 h than at 2 h with both drugs, but the majority of patients were still considered adequately controlled at 24 h. Atenolol and metoprolol SA can be considered equally effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and can be recommended as a once daily regime.

Full text

PDF
715

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Comerford M. B., Besterman E. Dosing intervals in beta-blocker therapy. Lancet. 1980 Nov 29;2(8205):1196–1196. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92629-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Freestone S., Silas J. H., Lennard M. S., Ramsay L. E. Comparison of two long-acting preparations of metoprolol with conventional metoprolol and atenolol in healthy men during chronic dosing. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982 Nov;14(5):713–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb04962.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnsson G., Jordö L., Lundborg P., Regårdh C. G., Rönn O. Plasma levels and pharmacological effects of metoprolol administered as controlled release (Durules) and ordinary tablets in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1980 Jul;18(7):292–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McAinsh J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of atenolol. Postgrad Med J. 1977;53 (Suppl 3):74–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Scott A. K., Rigby J. W., Webster J., Hawksworth G. M., Petrie J. C., Lovell H. G. Atenolol and metoprolol once daily in hypertension. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 May 22;284(6328):1514–1516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6328.1514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilcox R. G., Hampton J. R. Comparative study of atenolol, metoprolol, metoprolol durules, and slow-release oxprenolol in essential hypertension. Br Heart J. 1981 Nov;46(5):498–502. doi: 10.1136/hrt.46.5.498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES