Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 1980;10(Suppl 1):33S–35S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb04902.x

Elimination of guanfacine in patients with normal and impaired renal function

W Kirch, H Köhler, W Braun
PMCID: PMC1430110  PMID: 6994776

Abstract

1 Total body clearance and renal clearance after single intravenous doses of guanfacine were 360 ± 262 (mean ± s.d.) and 233 ± 245 ml/min, respectively, in patients with normal renal function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 90 ml/min), 308 ± 274 and 34 ± 22 ml/min, respectively, in patients with moderately impaired renal function (GFR 30-10 ml/min), and 257 ± 187 and 18 ± 15 ml/min, respectively, in preuremic patients (GFR < 10 ml/min).

2 The cumulative urinary excretion up to 48 h after a single intravenous injection of guanfacine was 57.0 ± 32.0% in patients with GFR > 90 ml/min, 14.0 ± 9.0% in patients with GFR 30-10 ml/min and 7.5 ± 2.4% in preuremic patients.

3 In normal as well as impaired renal function the elimination rate constant of guanfacine was 0.05 h-1, which corresponds to an elimination half-life of 14 h, independent of renal function.

4 These results suggest that non-renal elimination of guanfacine plays an important role in patients with renal failure.

5 Intestinal absorption of guanfacine was calculated to be 59 ± 19% in patients with GFR > 90 ml/min, to 68 ± 16% in patients with GFR 30-10 ml/min, and to 73 ± 36% in preuremic patients.

Full text

PDF
33S

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bream J. B., Lauener H., Picard C. W., Scholtysik G., White T. G. Substituted phenylacetylguanidines: a new class of antihypertensive agents. Arzneimittelforschung. 1975 Oct;25(10):1477–1482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Esch I. Erste Erfahrungen mit BS 100-141, einer neuen blutdrucksenkenden Substanz. Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1976 Sep;14(2):109–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirch W., Distler A. Antihypertensive effect of N-amidino-2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl) acetamide hydrochloride. A double-blind cross-over trial versus clonidine. Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1978 Mar;16(3):132–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Milutinovic J., Cutler R. E., Hoover P., Meijsen B., Scribner B. H. Measurement of residual glomerular filtration rate in the patient receiving repetitive hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1975 Sep;8(3):185–190. doi: 10.1038/ki.1975.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rahn K. H. The influence of renal function on plasma levels, urinary excretion, metabolism, and antihypertensive effect of guanethidine (ismelin) in man. Clin Nephrol. 1973 Jan-Feb;1(1):14–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Saameli K., Scholtysik G., Waite R. Pharmacology of BS 100-141, a centrally acting antihypertensive drug. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1975;Suppl 2:207–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Scholtysik G., Lauener H., Eichenberger E., Bürki H., Salzmann R., Müller-Schweinitzer E., Waite R. Pharmacological actions of the antihypertensive agent N-amidino-2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)acetamide hydrochloride (BS 100-141). Arzneimittelforschung. 1975 Oct;25(10):1483–1491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES