Skip to main content
PMC home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1989 Aug;30(8):1040–1047. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.8.1040

24 hour ambulatory oesophageal motility monitoring: how should motility data be analysed?

J E Richter 1, D O Castell 1
PMCID: PMC1434182  PMID: 2767498

Abstract

Ambulatory oesophageal motility/pH monitoring permits accurate detection of oesophageal events during spontaneous chest pain episodes. Opinions differ, however, about the methods to review the extensive motility data and the definition of abnormal motility changes. We studied 30 patients (18 women, age 46 years) with suspected oesophageal chest pain using a portable recording system attached to a 4.5 mm catheter with pressure transducers 3 and 8 cm and pH probe 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS). An event marker was triggered by the patient for chest pain. In the patient's diary, pain was recorded on a scale of increasing severity 1-10. Two methods of analysis were used to assess 24 hour motility data. The 24 hour technique sampled five minute asymptomatic baselines throughout the study to define the patient's normal range of oesophageal motility. The second technique used only the 10 minute period immediately before each chest pain episode as the asymptomatic baseline. Chest pain episodes were defined as abnormal if associated with pH less than 4 or motility changes not present during the asymptomatic baseline analysis: 135 chest pain episodes were recorded. The method of motility analysis significantly (p less than 0.01) changed the number of chest pain episodes associated with abnormal motility: 24 hour technique - 14 episodes (10%) versus a 2.5-fold increase with the 10 minute baseline technique - 33 episodes (24%). Acid related pain episodes were similar in both groups - 13%. The majority of chest pain episodes had no association with abnormal motility or acid reflux. Increasing chest pain severity was inversely correlated with the presence of abnormal oesophageal events. We conclude that limited analysis of 24 hour motility data may over diagnose motility related chest pain events and lead to inappropriate medical or surgical therapy.

Full text

PDF
1040

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERNSTEIN L. M., BAKER L. A. A clinical test for esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1958 May;34(5):760–781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barish C. F., Castell D. O., Richter J. E. Graded esophageal balloon distention. A new provocative test for noncardiac chest pain. Dig Dis Sci. 1986 Dec;31(12):1292–1298. doi: 10.1007/BF01299805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell J. N., Meyer R. A., LaMotte R. H. Sensitization of myelinated nociceptive afferents that innervate monkey hand. J Neurophysiol. 1979 Nov;42(6):1669–1679. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.6.1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clouse R. E., Lustman P. J. Psychiatric illness and contraction abnormalities of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 1983 Dec 1;309(22):1337–1342. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198312013092201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clouse R. E., Staiano A. Contraction abnormalities of the esophageal body in patients referred to manometry. A new approach to manometric classification. Dig Dis Sci. 1983 Sep;28(9):784–791. doi: 10.1007/BF01296900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clouse R. E., Staiano A., Landau D. W., Schlachter J. L. Manometric findings during spontaneous chest pain in patients with presumed esophageal "spasms". Gastroenterology. 1983 Aug;85(2):395–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dodds W. J., Hogan W. J., Reid D. P., Stewart E. T., Arndorfer R. C. A comparison between primary esophageal peristalsis following wet and dry swallows. J Appl Physiol. 1973 Dec;35(6):851–857. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.6.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fitzgerald M., Lynn B. The sensitization of high threshold mechanoreceptors with myelinated axons by repeated heating. J Physiol. 1977 Feb;265(2):549–563. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hollis J. B., Castell D. O. Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis. J Appl Physiol. 1975 Jun;38(6):1161–1164. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1975.38.6.1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Janssens J., Vantrappen G., Ghillebert G. 24-hour recording of esophageal pressure and pH in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Gastroenterology. 1986 Jun;90(6):1978–1984. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90270-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson L. F., Demeester T. R. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol. 1974 Oct;62(4):325–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Katz P. O., Dalton C. B., Richter J. E., Wu W. C., Castell D. O. Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr;106(4):593–597. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maas L. C., Gordon R. K., Penner D., Barkel D., Gordon S., Linert D., Petty D. 24-hour ambulatory manometry in diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders causing chest pain. South Med J. 1985 Jul;78(7):810–813. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198507000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peters L., Maas L., Petty D., Dalton C., Penner D., Wu W., Castell D., Richter J. Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain. Evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring. Gastroenterology. 1988 Apr;94(4):878–886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Richter J. E., Barish C. F., Castell D. O. Abnormal sensory perception in patients with esophageal chest pain. Gastroenterology. 1986 Oct;91(4):845–852. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90685-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Richter J. E., Dalton C. B., Bradley L. A., Castell D. O. Oral nifedipine in the treatment of noncardiac chest pain in patients with the nutcracker esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1987 Jul;93(1):21–28. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90308-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Richter J. E., Hackshaw B. T., Wu W. C., Castell D. O. Edrophonium: a useful provocative test for esophageal chest pain. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Jul;103(1):14–21. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-1-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Richter J. E., Obrecht W. F., Bradley L. A., Young L. D., Anderson K. O. Psychological comparison of patients with nutcracker esophagus and irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 1986 Feb;31(2):131–138. doi: 10.1007/BF01300697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Richter J. E., Wu W. C., Johns D. N., Blackwell J. N., Nelson J. L., 3rd, Castell J. A., Castell D. O. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of "abnormal" contractions. Dig Dis Sci. 1987 Jun;32(6):583–592. doi: 10.1007/BF01296157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vantrappen G., Janssens J., Ghillebert G. The irritable oesophagus--a frequent cause of angina-like pain. Lancet. 1987 May 30;1(8544):1232–1234. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92686-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES