Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1988 Sep;29(9):1188–1193. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.9.1188

Prospective comparison of double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding: barium enema v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding.

E J Irvine 1, J O'Connor 1, R A Frost 1, P Shorvon 1, S Somers 1, G W Stevenson 1, R H Hunt 1
PMCID: PMC1434375  PMID: 3273756

Abstract

Rectal bleeding often heralds serious colonic disease. The literature suggests that colonoscopy is superior to barium enema plus sigmoidoscopy, although no good comparative studies exist. Seventy one patients with overt rectal bleeding had prospectively flexible sigmoidoscopy, double contrast barium enema and colonoscopy completed independently. Against the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of colonoscopy were 0.69 and 0.78 respectively for a spectrum of colonic lesions, while for combined flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema these values were 0.80 and 0.56, respectively. When assessing adenoma or carcinoma, colonoscopy was more sensitive at 0.82 v 0.73, while flexible sigmoidoscopy plus double contrast barium enema was superior for detecting diverticular disease. The positive predictive value for colonoscopy was 0.87 against 0.81 for flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema. This study confirms that colonoscopy should be a first line investigation in subjects likely to require biopsy or therapeutic intervention.

Full text

PDF
1188

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker S. R., Alterman D. D. False-negative barium enema in patients with sigmoid cancer and coexistent diverticula. Gastrointest Radiol. 1985;10(2):171–173. doi: 10.1007/BF01893095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bat L., Pines A., Rabau M., Niv Y., Shemesh E. Colonoscopic findings in patients with hemorrhoids, rectal bleeding and normal rectoscopy. Isr J Med Sci. 1985 Feb;21(2):139–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapuis P. H., Goulston K. J., Dent O. F., Tait A. D. Predictive value of rectal bleeding in screening for rectal and sigmoid polyps. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 May 25;290(6481):1546–1548. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6481.1546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dent O. F., Goulston K. J., Zubrzycki J., Chapuis P. H. Bowel symptoms in an apparently well population. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986 Apr;29(4):243–247. doi: 10.1007/BF02553027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dodd G. D. The air contrast barium enema--indications and validity. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;186:133–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ghazi A., Grossman M. Complications of colonoscopy and polypectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1982 Oct;62(5):889–896. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)42839-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilbertsen V. A., Williams S. E., Schuman L., McHugh R. Colonoscopy in the detection of carcinoma of the intestine. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Dec;149(6):877–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goulston K. J., Cook I., Dent O. F. How important is rectal bleeding in the diagnosis of bowel cancer and polyps? Lancet. 1986 Aug 2;2(8501):261–265. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Howard O. M., Buchanan J. D., Hunt R. H. Angiodysplasia of the colon. Experience of 26 cases. Lancet. 1982 Jul 3;2(8288):16–19. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91153-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaude J. V., Harty R. F. Sensitivity of single contrast barium enema with regard to colorectal disease as diagnosed by colonoscopy. Eur J Radiol. 1982 Nov;2(4):290–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Knutson C. O., Max M. H. Value of colonoscopy in patients with rectal blood loss unexplained by rigid proctosigmoidoscopy and barium contrast enema examinations. Am J Surg. 1980 Jan;139(1):84–87. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90234-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leicester R. J., Hawley P. R., Pollett W. G., Nicholls R. J. Flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy as an outpatient procedure. Lancet. 1982 Jan 2;1(8262):34–35. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92568-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leinicke J. L., Dodds W. J., Hogan W. J., Stewart E. T. A comparison of colonoscopy and roentgenography for detecting polypoid lesions of the colon. Gastrointest Radiol. 1977 Oct 25;2(2):125–128. doi: 10.1007/BF02256483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Macrae F. A., Tan K. G., Williams C. B. Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies. Gut. 1983 May;24(5):376–383. doi: 10.1136/gut.24.5.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Masel H., Masel J. P., Casey K. V. A survey of colon examination techniques in Australia and New Zealand, with a review of complications. Australas Radiol. 1971 May;15(2):140–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1971.tb01252.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ott D. J., Chen Y. M., Gelfand D. W., Wu W. C., Munitz H. A. Single-contrast vs double-contrast barium enema in the detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 May;146(5):993–996. doi: 10.2214/ajr.146.5.993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ott D. J., Gelfand D. W., Wu W. C., Kerr R. M. Sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema: emphasis on polyp detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980 Aug;135(2):327–330. doi: 10.2214/ajr.135.2.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rex D. K., Lehman G. A., Lappas J. C., Miller R. E. Sensitivity of double-contrast barium study for left-colon polyps. Radiology. 1986 Jan;158(1):69–72. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.1.3940401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Richter J. M., Hedberg S. E., Athanasoulis C. A., Schapiro R. H. Angiodysplasia. Clinical presentation and colonoscopic diagnosis. Dig Dis Sci. 1984 Jun;29(6):481–485. doi: 10.1007/BF01296266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SEAMAN W. B., WELLS J. COMPLICATIONS OF THE BARIUM ENEMA. Gastroenterology. 1965 Jun;48:728–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shinya H., Cwern M., Wolf G. Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of rectal bleeding. Surg Clin North Am. 1982 Oct;62(5):897–903. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)42840-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Silman A. J., Mitchell P., Nicholls R. J., Macrae F. A., Leicester R. J., Bartram C. I., Simmons M. J., Campbell P. D., Hearn C. E., Constable P. J. Self-reported dark red bleeding as a marker comparable with occult blood testing in screening for large bowel neoplasms. Br J Surg. 1983 Dec;70(12):721–724. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800701209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spencer R. J., Wolff B. G., Ready R. L. Comparison of the rigid sigmoidoscope and the flexible sigmoidoscope in conjunction with colon x-ray for detection of lesions of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983 Oct;26(10):653–655. doi: 10.1007/BF02553334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Staniland J. R., Ditchburn J., de Dombal F. T. Clinical presentation of diseases of the large bowel. A detailed study of 642 patients. Gastroenterology. 1976 Jan;70(1):22–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tedesco F. J., Gottfried E. B., Corless J. K., Brownstein R. E. Prospective evaluation of hospitalized patients with nonactive lower intestinal bleeding--timing and role of barium enema and colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1984 Oct;30(5):281–283. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(84)72418-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tedesco F. J., Waye J. D., Raskin J. B., Morris S. J., Greenwald R. A. Colonoscopic evaluation of rectal bleeding: a study of 304 patients. Ann Intern Med. 1978 Dec;89(6):907–909. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-89-6-907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Thoeni R. F., Venbrux A. C. The value of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examinations in the evaluation of patients with subacute and chronic lower intestinal bleeding. Radiology. 1983 Mar;146(3):603–607. doi: 10.1148/radiology.146.3.6600844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thoeni R. F., Venbrux A. C. The value of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examinations in the evaluation of patients with subacute and chronic lower intestinal bleeding. Radiology. 1983 Mar;146(3):603–607. doi: 10.1148/radiology.146.3.6600844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Waye J. D. Colonoscopy in rectal bleeding. S Afr J Surg. 1976 Sep;14(3):143–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams C. B., Macrae F. A., Bartram C. I. A prospective study of diagnostic methods in adenoma follow-up. Endoscopy. 1982 May;14(3):74–78. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Winawer S. J., Leidner S. D., Boyle C., Kurtz R. C. Comparison of flexible sigmoidoscopy with other diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of rectocolon neoplasia. Dig Dis Sci. 1979 Apr;24(4):277–281. doi: 10.1007/BF01296540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Winthrop J. D., Balfe D. M., Shackelford G. D., McAlister W. H., Rosenblum J. L., Siegel M. J. Ulcerative and granulomatous colitis in children. Comparison of double- and single-contrast studies. Radiology. 1985 Mar;154(3):657–660. doi: 10.1148/radiology.154.3.3969468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wolf E. L., Frager D., Beneventano T. C. Feasibility of double-contrast barium enema in the elderly. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Jul;145(1):47–48. doi: 10.2214/ajr.145.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wolff W. I., Shinya H., Geffen A., Ozoktay S., DeBeer R. Comparison of colonoscopy and the contrast enema in five hundred patients with colorectal disease. Am J Surg. 1975 Feb;129(2):181–186. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(75)90295-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES