Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1989 Oct;30(10):1379–1384. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.10.1379

Prevalence of surreptitious laxative abuse in patients with diarrhoea of uncertain origin: a cost benefit analysis of a screening procedure.

P Bytzer 1, M Stokholm 1, I Andersen 1, N A Klitgaard 1, O B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell 1
PMCID: PMC1434416  PMID: 2511089

Abstract

The costs and medical benefits of an early, routine laxative screening test in patients with diarrhoea of uncertain origin was evaluated. During a two year period 200 consecutive, unselected patients complaining of diarrhoea were considered for the study in whom a three day faecal collection was undertaken. Fifty four patients denying laxative consumption had diarrhoea (mean daily stool weight greater than 200 g) of uncertain origin at their initial visit of whom 47 were screened to detect ingestion of anthraquinones, bisacodyl, phenolphthalein, and magnesium salts. Seven patients had positive tests. No single clinical feature could have predicted the outcome of the test. The possible cost savings of the programme were estimated by not releasing the results of the test to the clinicians until the patient's investigations were complete. The seven patients with laxative abuse spent a total of 35 days in hospital and were seen on 29 occasions in the outpatient clinic after the laxative screening test was positive. The cost of the screening programme was cheaper than the costs of the diagnostic procedures in patients with laxative abuse. We recommend the use of a comprehensive, early laxative screening programme in all patients with diarrhoea of uncertain origin as a cost effective procedure.

Full text

PDF
1379

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cooke W. T. Laxative abuse. Clin Gastroenterol. 1977 Sep;6(3):659–673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cummings J. H. Laxative abuse. Gut. 1974 Sep;15(9):758–766. doi: 10.1136/gut.15.9.758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cummings J. H., Sladen G. E., James O. F., Sarner M., Misiewicz J. J. Laxative-induced diarrhoea: a continuing clinical problem. Br Med J. 1974 Mar 23;1(5907):537–541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5907.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doubilet P., Weinstein M. C., McNeil B. J. Use and misuse of the term "cost effective" in medicine. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 23;314(4):253–256. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601233140421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ewe K., Karbach U. Factitious diarrhoea. Clin Gastroenterol. 1986 Jul;15(3):723–740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Plumeri P. A. The room search. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1984 Apr;6(2):181–185. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198404000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Read N. W., Krejs G. J., Read M. G., Santa Ana C. A., Morawski S. G., Fordtran J. S. Chronic diarrhea of unknown origin. Gastroenterology. 1980 Feb;78(2):264–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Slung P. H., Carey W. D. Clinical features and follow-up of surreptitious laxative users. Cleve Clin Q. 1984 Spring;51(1):167–171. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.51.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. de Wolff F. A., Edelbroek P. M., de Haas E. J., Vermeij P. Experience with a screening method for laxative abuse. Hum Toxicol. 1983 Apr;2(2):385–389. doi: 10.1177/096032718300200235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. de Wolff F. A., de Haas E. J., Verweij M. A screening method for establishing laxative abuse. Clin Chem. 1981 Jun;27(6):914–917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES