Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1983 Oct;44(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84272-6

Experimental study of the conducted action potential in cardiac Purkinje strands.

M K Walton, H A Fozzard
PMCID: PMC1434800  PMID: 6626674

Abstract

Conduction velocity is a complex physiological process that integrates the active and passive properties of the excitable cell. The relations between these properties in determining the conduction velocity are not intuitively obvious, and models have been used frequently to illustrate important relationships. To study the relationships of important parameters and to evaluate commonly used models, we changed conduction velocity experimentally in sheep cardiac Purkinje strands by reducing extracellular Na systematically. Cable analyses were also performed to obtain passive membrane and cable properties. Resting membrane resistance and capacitance did not change, nor did core resistance. Active properties measured in addition to conduction velocity included maximal upstroke velocity, action potential height, time constant of the foot, peak inward current, and upstroke power. With reduction in extracellular Na, all of these parameters of the action potential changed nonlinearly and not in direct proportion to the change in conduction velocity. The only simple relation found was a linear relationship between maximal upstroke velocity and peak inward current, normalized by the capacity of the foot. Models based on the cable equation and the wave equation offer a basis for quantitative analysis of conduction, and these data can be used to test the models.

Full text

PDF
1

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cahalan M., Begenisich T. Sodium channel selectivity. Dependence on internal permeant ion concentration. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Aug;68(2):111–125. doi: 10.1085/jgp.68.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell D. T. Ionic selectivity of the sodium channel of frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Mar;67(3):295–307. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.3.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cole K. S., Curtis H. J. ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE OF NITELLA DURING ACTIVITY. J Gen Physiol. 1938 Sep 20;22(1):37–64. doi: 10.1085/jgp.22.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dahl G., Isenberg G. Decoupling of heart muscle cells: correlation with increased cytoplasmic calcium activity and with changes of nexus ultrastructure. J Membr Biol. 1980 Mar 31;53(1):63–75. doi: 10.1007/BF01871173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Délèze J. The recovery of resting potential and input resistance in sheep heart injured by knife or laser. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):547–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis D. The effects of external cations and ouabain on the intracellular sodium activity of sheep heart Purkinje fibres. J Physiol. 1977 Dec;273(1):211–240. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fozzard H. A. Membrane capacity of the cardiac Purkinje fibre. J Physiol. 1966 Jan;182(2):255–267. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fozzard H. A., Schoenberg M. Strength-duration curves in cardiac Purkinje fibres: effects of liminal length and charge distribution. J Physiol. 1972 Nov;226(3):593–618. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Freygang W. H., Trautwein W. The structural implications of the linear electrical properties of cardiac Purkinje strands. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Apr;55(4):524–547. doi: 10.1085/jgp.55.4.524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldman D. E. POTENTIAL, IMPEDANCE, AND RECTIFICATION IN MEMBRANES. J Gen Physiol. 1943 Sep 20;27(1):37–60. doi: 10.1085/jgp.27.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):500–544. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hardy W. L. Propagation speed in myelinated nerve. I. Experimental dependence on external Na and on temperature. Biophys J. 1973 Oct;13(10):1054–1070. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)86045-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hille B. Ionic selectivity, saturation, and block in sodium channels. A four-barrier model. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Nov;66(5):535–560. doi: 10.1085/jgp.66.5.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hille B. The permeability of the sodium channel to organic cations in myelinated nerve. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Dec;58(6):599–619. doi: 10.1085/jgp.58.6.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Horn R., Patlak J., Stevens C. F. The effect of tetramethylammonium on single sodium channel currents. Biophys J. 1981 Nov;36(2):321–327. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84734-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. JENERICK H. AN ANALYSIS OF THE STRIATED MUSCLE FIBER ACTION CURRENT. Biophys J. 1964 Mar;4:77–91. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(64)86770-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. JENERICK H. PHASE PLANE TRAJECTORIES OF THE MUSCLE SPIKE POTENTIAL. Biophys J. 1963 Sep;3:363–377. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(63)86827-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jenerick H. Letters to the Editor. Biophys J. 1964 May;4(3):251–255. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(64)86780-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee C. O., Kang D. H., Sokol J. H., Lee K. S. Relation between intracellular Na ion activity and tension of sheep cardiac Purkinje fibers exposed to dihydro-ouabain. Biophys J. 1980 Feb;29(2):315–330. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(80)85135-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Levin D. N., Fozzard H. A. A cleft model for cardiac Purkinje strands. Biophys J. 1981 Mar;33(3):383–408. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84902-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sheu S. S., Fozzard H. A. Transmembrane Na+ and Ca2+ electrochemical gradients in cardiac muscle and their relationship to force development. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Sep;80(3):325–351. doi: 10.1085/jgp.80.3.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sheu S. S., Korth M., Lathrop D. A., Fozzard H. A. Intra- and extracellular K+ and Na+ activities and resting membrane potential in sheep cardiac purkinje strands. Circ Res. 1980 Nov;47(5):692–700. doi: 10.1161/01.res.47.5.692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. TASAKI I., HAGIWARA S. Capacity of muscle fiber membrane. Am J Physiol. 1957 Mar;188(3):423–429. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1957.188.3.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. WEIDMANN S. The electrical constants of Purkinje fibres. J Physiol. 1952 Nov;118(3):348–360. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Weingart R. The actions of ouabain on intercellular coupling and conduction velocity in mammalian ventricular muscle. J Physiol. 1977 Jan;264(2):341–365. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES