Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1984 Jun;45(6):1179–1184. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84266-6

Estimation of viscous dissipation inside an erythrocyte during aspirational entry into a micropipette.

H Tözeren, S Chien, A Tözeren
PMCID: PMC1435002  PMID: 6743748

Abstract

Viscous dissipation inside the erythrocyte during its aspirational entry into a micropipette is analyzed. The motion of the intracellular fluid is approximated by a flow into the micropipette orifice from a half space (the portion of the erythrocyte outside the micropipette). The stream function and intracellular pressure (p) in the half space are obtained as a function of radial and axial positions near the orifice. Solution of the boundary value problem for a uniform stream entering a circular hole gives p = 2 eta HQ/pi R3p, where eta H is the intracellular viscosity, Q is the total discharge, and Rp is the pipette radius. The results indicate that the moving erythrocyte membrane helps to drive the intracellular fluid into the orifice. For normal erythrocytes, p is only approximately 0.5% of the total aspiration pressure (delta P). The contribution of p to delta P, however, may become significant when there is a large increase in eta H due to a markedly elevated intracellular hemoglobin concentration or an alteration of the physical state of hemoglobin.

Full text

PDF
1179

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Briehl R. W. Solid-like behaviour of unsheared sickle haemoglobin gels and the effects of shear. Nature. 1980 Dec 11;288(5791):622–624. doi: 10.1038/288622a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chien S., King R. G., Kaperonis A. A., Usami S. Viscoelastic properties of sickle cells and hemoglobin. Blood Cells. 1982;8(1):53–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chien S., Sung K. L., Skalak R., Usami S., Tözeren A. Theoretical and experimental studies on viscoelastic properties of erythrocyte membrane. Biophys J. 1978 Nov;24(2):463–487. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85395-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cokelet G. R., Meiselman H. J. Rheological comparison of hemoglobin solutions and erythrocyte suspensions. Science. 1968 Oct 11;162(3850):275–277. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3850.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans E. A., Hochmuth R. M. Membrane viscoelasticity. Biophys J. 1976 Jan;16(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85658-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans E. A., Skalak R. Mechanics and thermodynamics of biomembranes: part 2. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng. 1979 Nov;3(4):331–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tözeren A., Skalak R., Sung K. L., Chien S. Viscoelastic behavior of erythrocyte membrane. Biophys J. 1982 Jul;39(1):23–32. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84486-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES