Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1985 Feb;47(2 Pt 1):183–202. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(85)83891-1

Miniature endplate potential frequency and amplitude determined by an extension of Campbell's theorem.

J R Segal, B Ceccarelli, R Fesce, W P Hurlbut
PMCID: PMC1435151  PMID: 3872137

Abstract

A method based upon an extension of Campbell's theorem is used to measure the amplitude, waveform, and frequency of occurrence of miniature endplate potentials (mepps) at rapidly secreting neuromuscular junctions of frog cutaneous pectoris muscles. Measurements of the variance, skew, and power spectrum of the fluctuations in membrane potential are used to deduce the mepp parameters. These estimates of mepp amplitude and frequency are insensitive to slow drifts in membrane potential that preclude the conventional application of Campbell's theorem, which uses the mean and variance. The new method becomes unreliable at high mepp frequencies because the distribution of the values of membrane potential approaches a Gaussian thereby reducing the accuracy of skew measurements. Frequencies approaching 10(4) s-1 can be measured, however, if the data are high-pass filtered. The method has been tested with computer simulated data and applied to junctions exposed to La3+; the effects of Ca2+ on the La3+-induced secretion have been explored. Some muscles were fixed after treatment with La3+, and changes in nerve terminal ultrastructure were assessed by morphometric analysis of electron micrographs. Horseradish peroxidase was used to obtain information about vesicle recycling.

Full text

PDF
183

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BIRKS R., HUXLEY H. E., KATZ B. The fine structure of the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1960 Jan;150:134–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ceccarelli B., Grohovaz F., Hurlbut W. P. Freeze-fracture studies of frog neuromuscular junctions during intense release of neurotransmitter. I. Effects of black widow spider venom and Ca2+-free solutions on the structure of the active zone. J Cell Biol. 1979 Apr;81(1):163–177. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.1.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ceccarelli B., Grohovaz F., Hurlbut W. P. Freeze-fracture studies of frog neuromuscular junctions during intense release of neurotransmitter. II. Effects of electrical stimulation and high potassium. J Cell Biol. 1979 Apr;81(1):178–192. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.1.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ceccarelli B., Hurlbut W. P. Ca2+-dependent recycling of synaptic vesicles at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Cell Biol. 1980 Oct;87(1):297–303. doi: 10.1083/jcb.87.1.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ceccarelli B., Hurlbut W. P., Mauro A. Depletion of vesicles from frog neuromuscular junctions by prolonged tetanic stimulation. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jul;54(1):30–38. doi: 10.1083/jcb.54.1.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ceccarelli B., Hurlbut W. P., Mauro A. Turnover of transmitter and synaptic vesicles at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Cell Biol. 1973 May;57(2):499–524. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.2.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ceccarelli B., Hurlbut W. P. The effects of prolonged repetitive stimulation in hemicholinium on the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 May;247(1):163–188. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ceccarelli B., Hurlbut W. P. Vesicle hypothesis of the release of quanta of acetylcholine. Physiol Rev. 1980 Apr;60(2):396–441. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1980.60.2.396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark A. W., Hurlbut W. P., Mauro A. Changes in the fine structure of the neuromuscular junction of the frog caused by black widow spider venom. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jan;52(1):1–14. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark A. W., Mauro A., Longenecker H. E., Jr, Hurlbut W. P. Effects of black widow spider venom on the frog neuromuscular junction. Effects on the fine structure of the frog neuromuscular junction. Nature. 1970 Feb 21;225(5234):703–705. doi: 10.1038/225703a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Biophysical aspects of neuro-muscular transmission. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1956;6:121–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DeBassio W. A., Schnitzler R. M., Parsons R. L. Influence of lanthanum on transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction. J Neurobiol. 1971;2(3):263–278. doi: 10.1002/neu.480020307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dodge F. A., Jr, Knight B. W., Toyoda J. Voltage noise in Limulus visual cells. Science. 1968 Apr 5;160(3823):88–90. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3823.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. FALK G., FATT P. LINEAR ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF STRIATED MUSCLE FIBRES OBSERVED WITH INTRACELLULAR ELECTRODES. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Apr 14;160:69–123. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. FATT P., KATZ B. Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1952 May;117(1):109–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S., Dennis M. J., Jan Y., Jan L., Evans L. Synaptic vesicle exocytosis captured by quick freezing and correlated with quantal transmitter release. J Cell Biol. 1979 May;81(2):275–300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S. Evidence for recycling of synaptic vesicle membrane during transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Cell Biol. 1973 May;57(2):315–344. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heuser J., Miledi R. Effects of lanthanum ions on function and structure of frog neuromuscular junctions. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1971 Dec 14;179(1056):247–260. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1971.0096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Holtzman E., Freeman A. R., Kashner L. A. Stimulation-dependent alterations in peroxidase uptake at lobster neuromuscular junctions. Science. 1971 Aug 20;173(3998):733–736. doi: 10.1126/science.173.3998.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hurlbut W. P., Ceccarelli B. Use of black widow spider venom to study the release of neurotransmitters. Adv Cytopharmacol. 1979;3:87–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Katz B., Miledi R. Transmitter leakage from motor nerve endings. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Feb 11;196(1122):59–72. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1977.0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kriebel M. E., Florey E. Effect of lanthanum ions on the amplitude distributions of miniature endplate potentials and on synaptic vesicles in frog neuromuscular junctions. Neuroscience. 1983 Jul;9(3):535–547. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90172-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lambert D. H., Parsons R. L. Influence of polyvalent cations on the activation of muscle end plate receptors. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Sep;56(3):309–321. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.3.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Letinsky M. S., Fischbeck K. H., McMahan U. J. Precision of reinnervation of original postsynaptic sites in frog muscle after a nerve crush. J Neurocytol. 1976 Dec;5(6):691–718. doi: 10.1007/BF01181582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lewis C. A. Ion-concentration dependence of the reversal potential and the single channel conductance of ion channels at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:417–445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schick K. L. Power spectra of pulse sequences and implications for membrane fluctuations. Acta Biotheor. 1974;23(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/BF01602049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sigworth F. J. Interpreting power spectra from nonstationary membrane current fluctuations. Biophys J. 1981 Aug;35(2):289–300. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84790-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Simonneau M., Tauc L., Baux G. Quantal release of acetylcholine examined by current fluctuation analysis at an identified neuro-neuronal synapse of Aplysia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Mar;77(3):1661–1665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.3.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. Active phase of frog's end-plate potential. J Neurophysiol. 1959 Jul;22(4):395–411. doi: 10.1152/jn.1959.22.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tauc L. Non vesicular release of neurotransmitter. Physiol Rev. 1982 Jul;62(3):857–893. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1982.62.3.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Valtorta F., Madeddu L., Meldolesi J., Ceccarelli B. Specific localization of the alpha-latrotoxin receptor in the nerve terminal plasma membrane. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 1):124–132. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Verveen A. A., DeFelice L. J. Membrane noise. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1974;28:189–265. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(74)90019-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weibel E. R., Paumgartner D. Integrated stereological and biochemical studies on hepatocytic membranes. II. Correction of section thickness effect on volume and surface density estimates. J Cell Biol. 1978 May;77(2):584–597. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.2.584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wong F., Knight B. W. Adapting-bump model for eccentric cells of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Nov;76(5):539–557. doi: 10.1085/jgp.76.5.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES