Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1984 Jan;45(1):249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84152-1

A structural model of the acetylcholine receptor channel based on partition energy and helix packing calculations.

H R Guy
PMCID: PMC1435233  PMID: 6324907

Abstract

A structural model of the transmembrane portion of the acetylcholine receptor was developed from sequences of all its subunits by using transfer energy calculations to locate transmembrane alpha-helices and to calculate which helical side chains should be in contact with water inside the channel, with portions of other transmembrane helices, or with lipid hydrocarbon chains. "Knobs-into-holes" side chain packing calculations were used with other factors to stack the transmembrane alpha-helices together. In the model each subunit has the following structures in order along the sequence from the NH2 terminus: a large extracellular domain of undetermined structure, a short apolar alpha-helix that lies on the extracellular lipid surface of the membrane; three apolar transmembrane alpha-helices (I, II, and III), a cytoplasmic domain of undetermined structure, an amphipathic transmembrane alpha-helix (L) that forms the channel lining, a short extracellular alpha-helix, another apolar transmembrane alpha-helix (IV), and a small cytoplasmic domain formed by the COOH-terminal end of the chain. Three concentric layers form the pore. A bundle of five amphipathic L helices forms the channel lining. This bundle is surrounded by a bundle of 10 alternating II and III helices. Helices I and IV cover portions of the outer surface of the bundle formed by helices II and III. Positions of disulfide bridges are predicted and a mechanism for opening and closing conformational changes is proposed that requires tilting transmembrane helices and possibly a thiol-disulfide interchange reaction.

Full text

PDF
249

Images in this article

252FIGURE 2
on p.252
253FIGURE 3
on p.253
253FIGURE 4
on p.253
255FIGURE 5
on p.255

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Auerbach A., Sachs F. Flickering of a nicotinic ion channel to a subconductance state. Biophys J. 1983 Apr;42(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84362-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Claudio T., Ballivet M., Patrick J., Heinemann S. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor gamma subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(4):1111–1115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis C. G., Hestrin S., Landahl H., Gordon A. S., Diamond I., Korenbrot J. I. Activation of acetylcholine receptors causes the partition of hydrophobic cations into postsynaptic membrane vesicles. Nature. 1983 Apr 7;302(5908):525–528. doi: 10.1038/302525a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Devillers-Thiery A., Giraudat J., Bentaboulet M., Changeux J. P. Complete mRNA coding sequence of the acetylcholine binding alpha-subunit of Torpedo marmorata acetylcholine receptor: a model for the transmembrane organization of the polypeptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(7):2067–2071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.7.2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dunker A. K., Zaleske D. J. Stereochemical considerations for constructing alpha-helical protein bundles with particular application to membrane proteins. Biochem J. 1977 Apr 1;163(1):45–57. doi: 10.1042/bj1630045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gekko K. Mechanism of polyol-induced protein stabilization: solubility of amino acids and diglycine in aqueous polyol solutions. J Biochem. 1981 Dec;90(6):1633–1641. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a133638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamill O. P., Sakmann B. Multiple conductance states of single acetylcholine receptor channels in embryonic muscle cells. Nature. 1981 Dec 3;294(5840):462–464. doi: 10.1038/294462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kistler J., Stroud R. M., Klymkowsky M. W., Lalancette R. A., Fairclough R. H. Structure and function of an acetylcholine receptor. Biophys J. 1982 Jan;37(1):371–383. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84685-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maeno T., Edwards C., Anraku M. Permeability of the endplate membrane activated by acetylcholine to some organic cations. J Neurobiol. 1977 Mar;8(2):173–184. doi: 10.1002/neu.480080208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moore H. P., Raftery M. A. Ligand-induced interconversion of affinity states in membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Effects of sulfhydryl and disulfide reagents. Biochemistry. 1979 May 15;18(10):1907–1911. doi: 10.1021/bi00577a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Kikyotani S., Furutani Y., Hirose T., Takashima H., Inayama S., Miyata T. Structural homology of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor subunits. Nature. 1983 Apr 7;302(5908):528–532. doi: 10.1038/302528a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nozaki Y., Tanford C. The solubility of amino acids and two glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions. Establishment of a hydrophobicity scale. J Biol Chem. 1971 Apr 10;246(7):2211–2217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oswald R., Changeux J. P. Ultraviolet light-induced labeling by noncompetitive blockers of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3925–3929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Prabhakaran M., Ponnuswamy P. K. Spatial assignment of amino acid residues in globular proteins: an approach from information theory. J Theor Biol. 1980 Dec 21;87(4):623–637. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(80)90108-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sumikawa K., Houghton M., Smith J. C., Bell L., Richards B. M., Barnard E. A. The molecular cloning and characterisation of cDNA coding for the alpha subunit of the acetylcholine receptor. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Oct 11;10(19):5809–5822. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.19.5809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Unwin P. N., Zampighi G. Structure of the junction between communicating cells. Nature. 1980 Feb 7;283(5747):545–549. doi: 10.1038/283545a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wise D. S., Wall J., Karlin A. Relative locations of the beta and delta chains of the acetylcholine receptor determined by electron microscopy of isolated receptor trimer. J Biol Chem. 1981 Dec 25;256(24):12624–12627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wolfenden R., Andersson L., Cullis P. M., Southgate C. C. Affinities of amino acid side chains for solvent water. Biochemistry. 1981 Feb 17;20(4):849–855. doi: 10.1021/bi00507a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yunger L. M., Cramer R. D., 3rd Measurement of correlation of partition coefficients of polar amino acids. Mol Pharmacol. 1981 Nov;20(3):602–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES