Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1982 Jun;75(6):399–403. doi: 10.1177/014107688207500606

Audit in a diabetic clinic.

D F Child, C P Williams
PMCID: PMC1437977  PMID: 7086787

Abstract

Diabetic control was assessed in 82 established insulin-dependent diabetics using a microcapillary system for home preprandial blood glucose sampling. At initial assessment control in the majority (62%) was found to be unsatisfactory (at least 1 preprandial blood glucose greater than 13.0 mmol/l or frequent and severe hypoglycaemia). Sixty-three of these patients were assessed on more than one occasion. Only 24% were satisfactorily controlled at their first assessment, but this proportion had risen to 60% after 12 months. The ability of patients to perform unsupervised blood glucose levels using Ames Glucometers or BM-Glycemie 20-800 test strips was also assessed: 86% of the meter results were within one-third of the laboratory-based results, but there was evidence of bias towards the under-reading of higher glucose values using BM-Glycemie 20-800 test strips. Random blood glucose estimations performed in the diabetic clinic were of little value.

Full text

PDF
399

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jarrett R. J., Keen H. Hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1976 Nov 6;2(7993):1009–1012. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90844-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lawson P. M., Kesson C. M., Ireland J. T. Performance of blood-glucose strips. Lancet. 1979 Oct 6;2(8145):742–742. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sönksen P. H., Judd S. L., Lowy C. Home monitoring of blood-glucose. Method for improving diabetic control. Lancet. 1978 Apr 8;1(8067):729–732. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90854-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Takazakura E., Nakamoto Y., Hayakawa H., Kawai K., Muramoto S. Onset and progression of diabetic glomerulosclerosis; a prospective study based on serial renal biopsies. Diabetes. 1975 Jan;24(1):1–9. doi: 10.2337/diab.24.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tattersall R. B. Home blood glucose monitoring. Diabetologia. 1979 Feb;16(2):71–74. doi: 10.1007/BF01225453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Walford S., Clarke P., Paisey R., Hartog M., Allison S. P. Home blood-glucose measurements without reflectance meter. Lancet. 1980 Mar 22;1(8169):653–654. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91146-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Walford S., Gale E. A., Allison S. P., Tattersall R. B. Self-monitoring of blood-glucose. Improvement of diabetic control. Lancet. 1978 Apr 8;1(8067):732–735. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90855-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Walford S., Page M. M., Allison S. P. The influence of renal threshold on the interpretation of urine tests for glucose in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1980 Nov-Dec;3(6):672–674. doi: 10.2337/diacare.3.6.672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Williams C. P., Davies G. K., Child D. F. A novel five-microlitre capillary system for home glucose monitoring. Ann Clin Biochem. 1981 Sep;18(Pt 5):304–307. doi: 10.1177/000456328101800507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES