Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1998 Oct;10(10):1747–1758. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.10.1747

Arabidopsis mutants impaired in cosuppression.

T Elmayan 1, S Balzergue 1, F Béon 1, V Bourdon 1, J Daubremet 1, Y Guénet 1, P Mourrain 1, J C Palauqui 1, S Vernhettes 1, T Vialle 1, K Wostrikoff 1, H Vaucheret 1
PMCID: PMC143939  PMID: 9761800

Abstract

Post-transcriptional gene silencing (cosuppression) results in the degradation of RNA after transcription. A transgenic Arabidopsis line showing post-transcriptional silencing of a 35S-uidA transgene and uidA-specific methylation was mutagenized using ethyl methanesulfonate. Six independent plants were isolated in which uidA mRNA accumulation and beta-glucuronidase activity were increased up to 3500-fold, whereas the transcription rate of the 35S-uidA transgene was increased only up to threefold. These plants each carried a recessive monogenic mutation that is responsible for the release of silencing. These mutations defined two genetic loci, called sgs1 and sgs2 (for suppressor of gene silencing). Transgene methylation was distinctly modified in sgs1 and sgs2 mutants. However, methylation of centromeric repeats was not affected, indicating that sgs mutants differ from ddm (for decrease in DNA methylation) and som (for somniferous) mutants. Indeed, unlike ddm and som mutations, sgs mutations were not able to release transcriptional silencing of a 35S-hpt transgene. Conversely, both sgs1 and sgs2 mutations were able to release cosuppression of host Nia genes and 35S-Nia2 transgenes. These results therefore indicate that sgs mutations act in trans to impede specifically transgene-induced post-transcriptional gene silencing.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (238.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow D. P. Gametic imprinting in mammals. Science. 1995 Dec 8;270(5242):1610–1613. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5242.1610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry C., Faugeron G., Rossignol J. L. Methylation induced premeiotically in Ascobolus: coextension with DNA repeat lengths and effect on transcript elongation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 15;90(10):4557–4561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baulcombe D. C. RNA as a target and an initiator of post-transcriptional gene silencing in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Oct;32(1-2):79–88. doi: 10.1007/BF00039378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cogoni C., Irelan J. T., Schumacher M., Schmidhauser T. J., Selker E. U., Macino G. Transgene silencing of the al-1 gene in vegetative cells of Neurospora is mediated by a cytoplasmic effector and does not depend on DNA-DNA interactions or DNA methylation. EMBO J. 1996 Jun 17;15(12):3153–3163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cogoni C., Macino G. Isolation of quelling-defective (qde) mutants impaired in posttranscriptional transgene-induced gene silencing in Neurospora crassa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 16;94(19):10233–10238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dehio C., Schell J. Identification of plant genetic loci involved in a posttranscriptional mechanism for meiotically reversible transgene silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5538–5542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Depicker A., Montagu M. V. Post-transcriptional gene silencing in plants. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997 Jun;9(3):373–382. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80010-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dorer D. R., Henikoff S. Expansions of transgene repeats cause heterochromatin formation and gene silencing in Drosophila. Cell. 1994 Jul 1;77(7):993–1002. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90439-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dougherty W. G., Parks T. D. Transgenes and gene suppression: telling us something new? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;7(3):399–405. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. English J. J., Mueller E., Baulcombe D. C. Suppression of Virus Accumulation in Transgenic Plants Exhibiting Silencing of Nuclear Genes. Plant Cell. 1996 Feb;8(2):179–188. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ingelbrecht I., Van Houdt H., Van Montagu M., Depicker A. Posttranscriptional silencing of reporter transgenes in tobacco correlates with DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 25;91(22):10502–10506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kakutani T., Jeddeloh J. A., Richards E. J. Characterization of an Arabidopsis thaliana DNA hypomethylation mutant. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Jan 11;23(1):130–137. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.1.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karpen G. H. Position-effect variegation and the new biology of heterochromatin. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994 Apr;4(2):281–291. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80055-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kelley R. L., Kuroda M. I. Equality for X chromosomes. Science. 1995 Dec 8;270(5242):1607–1610. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5242.1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lindbo J. A., Silva-Rosales L., Proebsting W. M., Dougherty W. G. Induction of a Highly Specific Antiviral State in Transgenic Plants: Implications for Regulation of Gene Expression and Virus Resistance. Plant Cell. 1993 Dec;5(12):1749–1759. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.12.1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Matzke M. A., Matzke AJM. How and Why Do Plants Inactivate Homologous (Trans)genes? Plant Physiol. 1995 Mar;107(3):679–685. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.3.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Metzlaff M., O'Dell M., Cluster P. D., Flavell R. B. RNA-mediated RNA degradation and chalcone synthase A silencing in petunia. Cell. 1997 Mar 21;88(6):845–854. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81930-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mittelsten Scheid O., Afsar K., Paszkowski J. Release of epigenetic gene silencing by trans-acting mutations in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jan 20;95(2):632–637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pal-Bhadra M., Bhadra U., Birchler J. A. Cosuppression in Drosophila: gene silencing of Alcohol dehydrogenase by white-Adh transgenes is Polycomb dependent. Cell. 1997 Aug 8;90(3):479–490. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80508-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Que Q., Wang H. Y., English J. J., Jorgensen R. A. The Frequency and Degree of Cosuppression by Sense Chalcone Synthase Transgenes Are Dependent on Transgene Promoter Strength and Are Reduced by Premature Nonsense Codons in the Transgene Coding Sequence. Plant Cell. 1997 Aug;9(8):1357–1368. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.8.1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sijen T., Wellink J., Hiriart J. B., Van Kammen A. RNA-Mediated Virus Resistance: Role of Repeated Transgenes and Delineation of Targeted Regions. Plant Cell. 1996 Dec;8(12):2277–2294. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.12.2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith H. A., Swaney S. L., Parks T. D., Wernsman E. A., Dougherty W. G. Transgenic plant virus resistance mediated by untranslatable sense RNAs: expression, regulation, and fate of nonessential RNAs. Plant Cell. 1994 Oct;6(10):1441–1453. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.10.1441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tanzer M. M., Thompson W. F., Law M. D., Wernsman E. A., Uknes S. Characterization of Post-Transcriptionally Suppressed Transgene Expression That Confers Resistance to Tobacco Etch Virus Infection in Tobacco. Plant Cell. 1997 Aug;9(8):1411–1423. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.8.1411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vaucheret H., Nussaume L., Palauqui J. C., Quillere I., Elmayan T. A Transcriptionally Active State Is Required for Post-Transcriptional Silencing (Cosuppression) of Nitrate Reductase Host Genes and Transgenes. Plant Cell. 1997 Aug;9(8):1495–1504. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.8.1495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vongs A., Kakutani T., Martienssen R. A., Richards E. J. Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation mutants. Science. 1993 Jun 25;260(5116):1926–1928. doi: 10.1126/science.8316832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wilkinson J. Q., Crawford N. M. Identification of the Arabidopsis CHL3 gene as the nitrate reductase structural gene NIA2. Plant Cell. 1991 May;3(5):461–471. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.5.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ye F., Signer E. R. RIGS (repeat-induced gene silencing) in Arabidopsis is transcriptional and alters chromatin configuration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 1;93(20):10881–10886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. de Carvalho Niebel F., Frendo P., Van Montagu M., Cornelissen M. Post-transcriptional cosuppression of beta-1,3-glucanase genes does not affect accumulation of transgene nuclear mRNA. Plant Cell. 1995 Mar;7(3):347–358. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES