Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1998 Oct;10(10):1723–1732. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.10.1723

Identification of residues in a hydrophilic loop of the Papaver rhoeas S protein that play a crucial role in recognition of incompatible pollen.

K Kakeda 1, N D Jordan 1, A Conner 1, J P Ride 1, V E Franklin-Tong 1, F C Franklin 1
PMCID: PMC143940  PMID: 9761798

Abstract

The self-incompatibility response involves S allele-specific recognition between stigmatic S proteins and incompatible pollen. This response results in pollen inhibition. Defining the amino acid residues within the stigmatic S proteins that participate in S allele-specific inhibition of incompatible pollen is essential for the elucidation of the molecular basis of the self-incompatibility response. We have constructed mutant derivatives of the S1 protein from Papaver rhoeas by using site-directed mutagenesis and have tested their biological activity. This has enabled us to identify amino acid residues in the stigmatic S proteins of P. rhoeas that are required for S-specific inhibition of incompatible pollen. We report here the identification of several amino acid residues in the predicted hydrophilic loop 6 of the P. rhoeas stigmatic S1 protein that are involved in the inhibition of S1 pollen. Mutation of the only hypervariable amino acid, which is situated in this loop, resulted in the complete loss of ability of the S protein to inhibit S1 pollen. This clearly demonstrates that this residue plays a crucial role in pollen recognition and may also participate in defining allelic specificity. We have also established the importance of highly conserved amino acids adjacent to this hypervariable site. Our studies demonstrate that both variable and conserved amino acids in the region of the S protein corresponding to surface loop 6 are key elements that play a role in the recognition and inhibition of incompatible pollen in the pollen-pistil self-incompatibility reaction.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (106.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foote H. C., Ride J. P., Franklin-Tong V. E., Walker E. A., Lawrence M. J., Franklin F. C. Cloning and expression of a distinctive class of self-incompatibility (S) gene from Papaver rhoeas L. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 15;91(6):2265–2269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.6.2265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Higuchi R., Krummel B., Saiki R. K. A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Aug 11;16(15):7351–7367. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.15.7351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ioerger T. R., Clark A. G., Kao T. H. Polymorphism at the self-incompatibility locus in Solanaceae predates speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(24):9732–9735. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kao T. H., McCubbin A. G. How flowering plants discriminate between self and non-self pollen to prevent inbreeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 29;93(22):12059–12065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kyte J., Doolittle R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lawrence C. E., Altschul S. F., Boguski M. S., Liu J. S., Neuwald A. F., Wootton J. C. Detecting subtle sequence signals: a Gibbs sampling strategy for multiple alignment. Science. 1993 Oct 8;262(5131):208–214. doi: 10.1126/science.8211139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lessl M., Balzer D., Lurz R., Waters V. L., Guiney D. G., Lanka E. Dissection of IncP conjugative plasmid transfer: definition of the transfer region Tra2 by mobilization of the Tra1 region in trans. J Bacteriol. 1992 Apr;174(8):2493–2500. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.8.2493-2500.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matton D. P., Maes O., Laublin G., Xike Q., Bertrand C., Morse D., Cappadocia M. Hypervariable Domains of Self-Incompatibility RNases Mediate Allele-Specific Pollen Recognition. Plant Cell. 1997 Oct;9(10):1757–1766. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.10.1757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rost B., Sander C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins. 1994 May;19(1):55–72. doi: 10.1002/prot.340190108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rost B., Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jul 20;232(2):584–599. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rost B., Sander C., Schneider R. PHD--an automatic mail server for protein secondary structure prediction. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994 Feb;10(1):53–60. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/10.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rudd J. J., Franklin FCH., Lord J. M., Franklin-Tong V. E. Increased Phosphorylation of a 26-kD Pollen Protein Is Induced by the Self-Incompatibility Response in Papaver rhoeas. Plant Cell. 1996 Apr;8(4):713–724. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.4.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schuler G. D., Altschul S. F., Lipman D. J. A workbench for multiple alignment construction and analysis. Proteins. 1991;9(3):180–190. doi: 10.1002/prot.340090304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stanssens P., Opsomer C., McKeown Y. M., Kramer W., Zabeau M., Fritz H. J. Efficient oligonucleotide-directed construction of mutations in expression vectors by the gapped duplex DNA method using alternating selectable markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Jun 26;17(12):4441–4454. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.12.4441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Verica J. A., McCubbin A. G., Kao T. Are the hypervariable regions of S RNases sufficient for allele-specific recognition of pollen? Plant Cell. 1998 Mar;10(3):314–317. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walker E. A., Ride J. P., Kurup S., Franklin-Tong V. E., Lawrence M. J., Franklin F. C. Molecular analysis of two functional homologues of the S3 allele of the Papaver rhoeas self-incompatibility gene isolated from different populations. Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Mar;30(5):983–994. doi: 10.1007/BF00020809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zurek D. M., Mou B., Beecher B., McClure B. Exchanging sequence domains between S-RNases from Nicotiana alata disrupts pollen recognition. Plant J. 1997 Apr;11(4):797–808. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11040797.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES