Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1984 Sep;77(9):751–753. doi: 10.1177/014107688407700908

Factors affecting the extrusion rates of ventilation tubes.

I J Mackenzie
PMCID: PMC1439984  PMID: 6541254

Abstract

A survey in which 939 ventilation tubes of 8 different patterns were inserted and reviewed (up to a maximum of 2 1/4 years) is analysed. Various factors determining the rate of extrusion are discussed. The Sheehy Collar Button tube remained functional for a longer period than any of the other tubes included in the survey.

Full text

PDF
751

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Holt J. J., Harner S. G. Effects of large-bore middle ear ventilation tubes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979) 1980 Sep-Oct;88(5):581–585. doi: 10.1177/019459988008800511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Pappas J. J. Middle ear ventilation tubes. Laryngoscope. 1974 Jul;84(7):1098–1117. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197407000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Paradise J. L. On tympanostomy tubes: rationale, results, reservations, and recommendations. Pediatrics. 1977 Jul;60(1):86–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shah N. Use of grommets in 'glue' ears. J Laryngol Otol. 1971 Mar;85(3):283–287. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100073448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES