Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1998 Mar;10(3):371–382. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.3.371

Ethylene regulates the susceptible response to pathogen infection in tomato.

S T Lund 1, R E Stall 1, H J Klee 1
PMCID: PMC144005  PMID: 9501111

Abstract

Ethylene evolution occurs concomitantly with the progression of disease symptoms in response to many virulent pathogen infections in plants. A tomato mutant impaired in ethylene perception-Never ripe-exhibited a significant reduction in disease symptoms in comparison to the wild type after inoculations of both genotypes with virulent bacterial (Xanthomonas campestris pv vesicatoria and Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato) and fungal (Fusarium oxysporum f sp lycopersici) pathogens. Bacterial spot disease symptoms were also reduced in tomato genotypes impaired in ethylene synthesis (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase) and perception (14893), thereby corroborating a reducing effect for ethylene insensitivity on foliar disease development. The reduction in foliar disease symptoms in Never ripe plants was a specific effect of ethylene insensitivity and was not due to reductions in bacterial populations or decreased ethylene synthesis. PR-1B1 mRNA accumulation in response to X. c. vesicatoria infection was not affected by ethylene insensitivity, indicating that ethylene is not required for defense gene induction. Our findings suggest that broad tolerance of diverse vegetative diseases may be achieved via engineering of ethylene insensitivity in tomato.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (606.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bent A. F., Innes R. W., Ecker J. R., Staskawicz B. J. Disease development in ethylene-insensitive Arabidopsis thaliana infected with virulent and avirulent Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas pathogens. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1992 Sep-Oct;5(5):372–378. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-5-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bent A. F. Plant Disease Resistance Genes: Function Meets Structure. Plant Cell. 1996 Oct;8(10):1757–1771. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bleecker A. B., Estelle M. A., Somerville C., Kende H. Insensitivity to Ethylene Conferred by a Dominant Mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 1988 Aug 26;241(4869):1086–1089. doi: 10.1126/science.241.4869.1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bleecker A. B., Schaller G. E. The Mechanism of Ethylene Perception. Plant Physiol. 1996 Jul;111(3):653–660. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.3.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brederode F. T., Linthorst H. J., Bol J. F. Differential induction of acquired resistance and PR gene expression in tobacco by virus infection, ethephon treatment, UV light and wounding. Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Dec;17(6):1117–1125. doi: 10.1007/BF00028729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Broglie K. E., Gaynor J. J., Broglie R. M. Ethylene-regulated gene expression: molecular cloning of the genes encoding an endochitinase from Phaseolus vulgaris. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(18):6820–6824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.18.6820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang C., Meyerowitz E. M. The ethylene hormone response in Arabidopsis: a eukaryotic two-component signaling system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4129–4133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Crute I. R., Pink DAC. Genetics and Utilization of Pathogen Resistance in Plants. Plant Cell. 1996 Oct;8(10):1747–1755. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Delaney T. P., Uknes S., Vernooij B., Friedrich L., Weymann K., Negrotto D., Gaffney T., Gut-Rella M., Kessmann H., Ward E., Ryals J. A central role of salicylic Acid in plant disease resistance. Science. 1994 Nov 18;266(5188):1247–1250. doi: 10.1126/science.266.5188.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ecker J. R., Davis R. W. Plant defense genes are regulated by ethylene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5202–5206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Enyedi A. J., Yalpani N., Silverman P., Raskin I. Signal molecules in systemic plant resistance to pathogens and pests. Cell. 1992 Sep 18;70(6):879–886. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90239-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guzmán P., Ecker J. R. Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell. 1990 Jun;2(6):513–523. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.6.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Klee H. J., Hayford M. B., Kretzmer K. A., Barry G. F., Kishore G. M. Control of ethylene synthesis by expression of a bacterial enzyme in transgenic tomato plants. Plant Cell. 1991 Nov;3(11):1187–1193. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.11.1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lanahan M. B., Yen H. C., Giovannoni J. J., Klee H. J. The never ripe mutation blocks ethylene perception in tomato. Plant Cell. 1994 Apr;6(4):521–530. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.4.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lawton K. A., Potter S. L., Uknes S., Ryals J. Acquired Resistance Signal Transduction in Arabidopsis Is Ethylene Independent. Plant Cell. 1994 May;6(5):581–588. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.5.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roby D., Broglie K., Gaynor J., Broglie R. Regulation of a chitinase gene promoter by ethylene and elicitors in bean protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 1991 Sep;97(1):433–439. doi: 10.1104/pp.97.1.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schaller G. E., Ladd A. N., Lanahan M. B., Spanbauer J. M., Bleecker A. B. The ethylene response mediator ETR1 from Arabidopsis forms a disulfide-linked dimer. J Biol Chem. 1995 May 26;270(21):12526–12530. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.21.12526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tornero P., Conejero V., Vera P. A gene encoding a novel isoform of the PR-1 protein family from tomato is induced upon viroid infection. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Apr;243(1):47–53. doi: 10.1007/BF00283875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tornero P., Gadea J., Conejero V., Vera P. Two PR-1 genes from tomato are differentially regulated and reveal a novel mode of expression for a pathogenesis-related gene during the hypersensitive response and development. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1997 Jul;10(5):624–634. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.5.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tornero P., Rodrigo I., Conejero V., Vera P. Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding a pathogenesis-related protein, p1-p14, from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Physiol. 1993 May;102(1):325–325. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.1.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Walton J. D. Host-selective toxins: agents of compatibility. Plant Cell. 1996 Oct;8(10):1723–1733. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilkinson J. Q., Lanahan M. B., Clark D. G., Bleecker A. B., Chang C., Meyerowitz E. M., Klee H. J. A dominant mutant receptor from Arabidopsis confers ethylene insensitivity in heterologous plants. Nat Biotechnol. 1997 May;15(5):444–447. doi: 10.1038/nbt0597-444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilkinson J. Q., Lanahan M. B., Yen H. C., Giovannoni J. J., Klee H. J. An ethylene-inducible component of signal transduction encoded by never-ripe. Science. 1995 Dec 15;270(5243):1807–1809. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5243.1807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. van Kan J. A., Joosten M. H., Wagemakers C. A., van den Berg-Velthuis G. C., de Wit P. J. Differential accumulation of mRNAs encoding extracellular and intracellular PR proteins in tomato induced by virulent and avirulent races of Cladosporium fulvum. Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Nov;20(3):513–527. doi: 10.1007/BF00040610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES