Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1998 Jun;10(6):947–956. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.6.947

An Arabidopsis mutant with enhanced resistance to powdery mildew.

C A Frye 1, R W Innes 1
PMCID: PMC144036  PMID: 9634583

Abstract

We have identified an Arabidopsis mutant that displays enhanced disease resistance to the fungus Erysiphe cichoracearum, causal agent of powdery mildew. The edr1 mutant does not constitutively express the pathogenesis-related genes PR-1, BGL2, or PR-5 and thus differs from previously described disease-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis. E. cichoracearum conidia (asexual spores) germinated normally and formed extensive hyphae on edr1 plants, indicating that the initial stages of infection were not inhibited. Production of conidiophores on edr1 plants, however, was <16% of that observed on wild-type Arabidopsis. Reduction in sporulation correlated with a more rapid induction of defense responses. Autofluorescent compounds and callose accumulated in edr1 leaves 3 days after inoculation with E. cichoracearum, and dead mesophyll cells accumulated in edr1 leaves starting 5 days after inoculation. Macroscopic patches of dead cells appeared 6 days after inoculation. This resistance phenotype is similar to that conferred by "late-acting" powdery mildew resistance genes of wheat and barley. The edr1 mutation is recessive and maps to chromosome 1 between molecular markers ATEAT1 and NCC1. We speculate that the edr1 mutation derepresses multiple defense responses, making them more easily induced by virulent pathogens.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (319.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adam L., Somerville S. C. Genetic characterization of five powdery mildew disease resistance loci in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1996 Mar;9(3):341–356. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.09030341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell C. J., Ecker J. R. Assignment of 30 microsatellite loci to the linkage map of Arabidopsis. Genomics. 1994 Jan 1;19(1):137–144. doi: 10.1006/geno.1994.1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bent A. F. Plant Disease Resistance Genes: Function Meets Structure. Plant Cell. 1996 Oct;8(10):1757–1771. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bisgrove S. R., Simonich M. T., Smith N. M., Sattler A., Innes R. W. A disease resistance gene in Arabidopsis with specificity for two different pathogen avirulence genes. Plant Cell. 1994 Jul;6(7):927–933. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.7.927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowling S. A., Clarke J. D., Liu Y., Klessig D. F., Dong X. The cpr5 mutant of Arabidopsis expresses both NPR1-dependent and NPR1-independent resistance. Plant Cell. 1997 Sep;9(9):1573–1584. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.9.1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowling S. A., Guo A., Cao H., Gordon A. S., Klessig D. F., Dong X. A mutation in Arabidopsis that leads to constitutive expression of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell. 1994 Dec;6(12):1845–1857. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.12.1845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Broekaert W. F., Terras F. R., Cammue B. P., Osborn R. W. Plant defensins: novel antimicrobial peptides as components of the host defense system. Plant Physiol. 1995 Aug;108(4):1353–1358. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.4.1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Büschges R., Hollricher K., Panstruga R., Simons G., Wolter M., Frijters A., van Daelen R., van der Lee T., Diergaarde P., Groenendijk J. The barley Mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell. 1997 Mar 7;88(5):695–705. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81912-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Delaney T. P., Uknes S., Vernooij B., Friedrich L., Weymann K., Negrotto D., Gaffney T., Gut-Rella M., Kessmann H., Ward E., Ryals J. A central role of salicylic Acid in plant disease resistance. Science. 1994 Nov 18;266(5188):1247–1250. doi: 10.1126/science.266.5188.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dietrich R. A., Delaney T. P., Uknes S. J., Ward E. R., Ryals J. A., Dangl J. L. Arabidopsis mutants simulating disease resistance response. Cell. 1994 May 20;77(4):565–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90218-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Epple P., Apel K., Bohlmann H. An Arabidopsis thaliana thionin gene is inducible via a signal transduction pathway different from that for pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Physiol. 1995 Nov;109(3):813–820. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.3.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Epple P., Apel K., Bohlmann H. Overexpression of an endogenous thionin enhances resistance of Arabidopsis against Fusarium oxysporum. Plant Cell. 1997 Apr;9(4):509–520. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.4.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gaffney T., Friedrich L., Vernooij B., Negrotto D., Nye G., Uknes S., Ward E., Kessmann H., Ryals J. Requirement of salicylic Acid for the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Science. 1993 Aug 6;261(5122):754–756. doi: 10.1126/science.261.5122.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Glazebrook J., Rogers E. E., Ausubel F. M. Isolation of Arabidopsis mutants with enhanced disease susceptibility by direct screening. Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):973–982. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenberg J. T., Guo A., Klessig D. F., Ausubel F. M. Programmed cell death in plants: a pathogen-triggered response activated coordinately with multiple defense functions. Cell. 1994 May 20;77(4):551–563. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90217-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu G., Richter T. E., Hulbert S. H., Pryor T. Disease Lesion Mimicry Caused by Mutations in the Rust Resistance Gene rp1. Plant Cell. 1996 Aug;8(8):1367–1376. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.8.1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hulbert S. H. Structure and evolution of the rp1 complex conferring rust resistance in maize. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1997;35:293–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.35.1.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. KING E. O., WARD M. K., RANEY D. E. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med. 1954 Aug;44(2):301–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Koch E., Slusarenko A. Arabidopsis is susceptible to infection by a downy mildew fungus. Plant Cell. 1990 May;2(5):437–445. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.5.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Konieczny A., Ausubel F. M. A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J. 1993 Aug;4(2):403–410. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kunkel B. N. A useful weed put to work: genetic analysis of disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Trends Genet. 1996 Feb;12(2):63–69. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)81402-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Logemann J., Schell J., Willmitzer L. Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal Biochem. 1987 May 15;163(1):16–20. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90086-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Penninckx I. A., Eggermont K., Terras F. R., Thomma B. P., De Samblanx G. W., Buchala A., Métraux J. P., Manners J. M., Broekaert W. F. Pathogen-induced systemic activation of a plant defensin gene in Arabidopsis follows a salicylic acid-independent pathway. Plant Cell. 1996 Dec;8(12):2309–2323. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.12.2309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peterhansel C., Freialdenhoven A., Kurth J., Kolsch R., Schulze-Lefert P. Interaction Analyses of Genes Required for Resistance Responses to Powdery Mildew in Barley Reveal Distinct Pathways Leading to Leaf Cell Death. Plant Cell. 1997 Aug;9(8):1397–1409. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.8.1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pieterse C. M., van Wees S. C., Hoffland E., van Pelt J. A., van Loon L. C. Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression. Plant Cell. 1996 Aug;8(8):1225–1237. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.8.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rao A. G. Antimicrobial peptides. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1995 Jan-Feb;8(1):6–13. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-8-0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ryals J. A., Neuenschwander U. H., Willits M. G., Molina A., Steiner H. Y., Hunt M. D. Systemic Acquired Resistance. Plant Cell. 1996 Oct;8(10):1809–1819. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Staskawicz B. J., Ausubel F. M., Baker B. J., Ellis J. G., Jones J. D. Molecular genetics of plant disease resistance. Science. 1995 May 5;268(5211):661–667. doi: 10.1126/science.7732374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Uknes S., Mauch-Mani B., Moyer M., Potter S., Williams S., Dincher S., Chandler D., Slusarenko A., Ward E., Ryals J. Acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1992 Jun;4(6):645–656. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.6.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Whalen M. C., Innes R. W., Bent A. F., Staskawicz B. J. Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pathogens of Arabidopsis and a bacterial locus determining avirulence on both Arabidopsis and soybean. Plant Cell. 1991 Jan;3(1):49–59. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wolter M., Hollricher K., Salamini F., Schulze-Lefert P. The mlo resistance alleles to powdery mildew infection in barley trigger a developmentally controlled defence mimic phenotype. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 May;239(1-2):122–128. doi: 10.1007/BF00281610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES