Abstract
Cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) genotyping reliably predicts poor metabolizer phenotype in Caucasians, but is less accurate in African Americans. To evaluate discordance we have observed in phenotype to genotype correlation studies, select African American subjects were chosen for complete resequencing of the CYP2D6 gene including 4.2 kb of the CYP2D7-2D6 intergenic region. Comparisons were made to a CYP2D6*1 reference sequence revealing novel SNPs in the upstream, coding and intervening sequences. These sequence variations, defining four functional alleles (CYP2D6*41B, *45A and B and *46), were characterized for their ability to influence splice site strength, transcription level or catalytic protein activity. Furthermore, their frequency was determined in a population of 251 African Americans. A −692TGTG deletion (CYP2D6*45B) did not significantly decrease gene expression, nor could any other upstream SNP explain a genotype-discordant case. CYP2D6*45 and *46 have a combined frequency of 4% and can be identified by a common SNP. Carriers are predicted to exhibit an extensive or intermediate CYP2D6 phenotype.
Keywords: CYP2D6, SNPs, haplotype, dextromethorphan, African American
INTRODUCTION
Cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) is a major drug-metabolizing enzyme that is implicated in the metabolism of several drugs used clinically, including β-receptor antagonists, antiarrhythmic agents, morphine derivatives and, notably, an increasing number of antidepressant and antipsychotic entities.1 This is not surprising in light of recent reports describing CYP2D6 activity towards endogenous substrates found in the human brain.2,3 The CYP2D6 gene locus is highly polymorphic and currently there are 51 allelic variants (CYP2D6*1 to *51 including the ones described within this report) and over 30 additional subvariants defined.4 As a consequence, CYP2D6 activity ranges widely within a population comprising ultrarapid (UM), extensive (EM), intermediate (IM) and poor (PM) metabolizer phenotypes. UM and PM are those most at risk for treatment failure or dose-dependent drug toxicity, respectively.
The incidence of PM subjects carrying two alleles encoding a nonfunctional or unstable enzyme is 5–10% in Caucasians, 3.5–8% in African Americans and ~1% in Asians. Caucasian populations have been extensively studied and a tight correlation between genotype and phenotype has been reported by many investigators using dextromethorphan (DM), debrisoquine or sparteine as probe drugs. In fact, genotyping strategies comprising a relatively small number of allelic variants (CYP2D6*3, *4, *5, *6, *7 and *8) detect almost all PMs among European and North American Whites.5–8 In Asians, best studied in Chinese and Japanese, about 1% of the population present as PM due to the presence of CYP2D6*4 and *5 alleles, and a high incidence of IMs is caused by the high allele frequency of CYP2D6*10 (f~0.5) that confers reduced activity.9,10 Despite an initial strong relationship between phenotype and genotype data in Asian populations, the observation of discordant cases has led to the identification of six rather rare new allelic variants (CYP2D6*14, *18, *21, *36x2, *39 and *44) that are associated with diminished or absent activity.4,11–16
In contrast, studies in Black populations describe probe drug dissociation and an overall reduced activity compared to Caucasians, also referred to as a ‘right-shift’ of the population phenotype distribution. This shift is similar to that seen in Asians. Furthermore, cases of genotype to phenotype discordance have been described in a number of studies, but remain unresolved.17–24 The presence of the reduced function alleles CYP2D6*17 and *29 partially explain lower activity in Blacks, but additional nonfunctional alleles and alleles encoding protein with reduced enzymatic properties likely exist.
While the CYP2D6 coding region has received much attention during recent years, very little is known about CYP2D6 gene regulation and the consequences of sequence variation in the gene’s upstream region.25–27 This was primarily due to the fact that sequence data to support these investigations was limited to 1620 bp of 5′-flanking sequence deposited in M33388 commonly referred to as the ‘Kimura sequence’.28 Furthermore, sequence data for the CYP2D7-2D6 intergenic region were incomplete, since the ‘Kimura sequence’ and accession X90926 (containing partial intergenic sequence and connecting with the CYP2D7/2D8 locus sequence M33387) did not overlap. This gap persisted in all releases of the Human Genome sequence until Build 34.3 (02-10-2004), because the DNA utilized was derived from a subject homozygous for the CYP2D6*5 gene deletion. Thus, substantial potentially important regulatory regions and sequence variations that may exist within those regions have not been thoroughly investigated.
In this study, we describe a reference sequence for CYP2D6*1 encompassing 9 kb extending from the 3′-end of X90926 to the 3′-end of CYP2D6 and identify the sequence variations present in the homologous 9 kb sequences derived from four novel alleles that were discovered in African American subjects. These sequence variations were assessed for their potential to alter protein activity, RNA transcription or RNA splicing in vitro in attempts to explain the finding of reduced activity in vivo.
RESULTS
Sequence Analysis of the CYP2D7-2D6 Intergenic Region
To close the CYP2D7-2D6 intergenic sequence gap, an 8953 bp long PCR product was generated, cloned and sequenced from a CYP2D6*1/*5 sample that had been extensively genotyped for 25 defined allelic variants. This CYP2D6*1 sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession number AY545216 and is being used as ‘reference sequence’ for all comparisons. Figure 1 shows the AY545216 sequence in comparison to M33388; both were identical within their common upstream portions, but differed in four positions within introns 1 and 2. Since these deviations occurred in all other alleles that were sequenced (including additional data not part of this report), they may represent errors in the original M33388 GenBank entry. To adhere with the widely accepted and standardized CYP2D6 nomenclature, we refer to the nucleotide numbering in M33388 (Figure 1, positions in brackets) throughout this paper.
Figure 1.

Sequence of six cloned CYP2D6 alleles was determined including 4029 bp of the 5′ regulatory region. Each line in the graphic display represents the haplotype of a single allele (derived from cloned allele). Open boxes correspond to the CYP2D6*1 reference sequences AY545216 and M33388; black boxes indicate sequence variations. X denotes sequence not part of M33388. Gray boxes indicated the common nonsynonymous SNP unique to CYP2D6*45A, *45B and *46. The sequence context line above the graph shows five nucleotides 5′ and 3′ of each variation, which is indicated in lower case; ‘del’ and ‘ins’ indicate nucleotide deletion and insertion. SNPs and their positions in AY545216 are as shown. The top row lists SNP positions with respect to the ATG start codon (A = +1) in AY545216 and M33388 within parentheses. Nucleotide positions as given for M33388 correspond to those used by the nomenclature web page.4 ♦in the CYP2D6*41B allele indicates a likely (A)4-insertion.
The AY545216 reference sequence information has permitted the redesign of primers to now amplify a 6.6 kb long PCR template for subsequent genotype analysis. The forward primer is situated upstream of the 5′-end of M33388 and encompasses the −1584C>G SNP as well as the entire CYP2D6 coding region, allowing convenient testing of all desirable SNPs from a single template.27
During the course of this study, an 18 kb sequence was released in GenBank that bridges CYP2D7 with CYP2D6 (NG_003180 derived from clone RP4-669P10). This sequence represents CYP2D6*2 and aligns with AY545216 in the positions that deviate from M33388 supporting the authenticity of these two new GenBank entries relative to M33388. Another recent sequence (AY480057) also closes the CYP2D6/2D7 gap, but limits itself to 2.63 kb of this particular region. Within shared sequences, AY480057 is identical to the AY545216 CYP2D6*1 reference sequence.
One region of intergenic sequence composed of a 22 bp long A-homopolymer at −1237 was particularly difficult to sequence. Even after extensive optimization (template length, primer position), sequence analysis remained somewhat recalcitrant. Each sequence was covered by multiple runs (forward and reverse) to obtain the best possible data. The CYP2D6*41B allele likely contains a (A)4-insertion and NG_003180 exhibits a (A)5-insertion, indicating that the number of A’s may be highly variable.
Discovery, Description and Characterization of Novel CYP2D6 Alleles
In order to resolve previously observed discordant results, DNAs from two subjects were cloned, sequenced and characterized.
Case 1
The first case initially exhibited an inconsistency in the CYP2D6*8 genotype assay result and inclusion into data analysis had been deferred due to the inability to unambiguously assign a genotype.29 A partial sequence analysis of exon 3 and flanking introns covering the location of the CYP2D6*8-associated SNP (1758G>T) revealed two new polymorphisms, namely 1757C>T, which prevented restriction digestion in the PCR-RFLP-based CYP2D6*8 assay and 1716G>A that confers an E155K substitution. Subsequent sequence analysis comprising the cloned 9 kb fragments of both alleles revealed two new allelic variants, CYP2D6*41B and CYP2D6*46 (Figure 1).
The 1757C>T on CYP2D6*41B is a synonymous SNP, but may affect RNA splicing since it is located at the −2 position of the exon 3 splice donor site. Information theory-based analysis determined an information content (Ri value) of 8.1 bits for 1757C, and hence classified it as a strong splice donor (note that the Ri values differ from those described by Rogan et al30 since calculations are based on the updated model available at https://splice.cmh.edu). Neither C nor T make a positive contribution to the site’s strength, but the presence of the variant 1757T slightly decreases the Ri value from 8.1 to 8.0 bits. This negligible change in the site’s strength is not expected to alter mRNA splicing. In contrast, the 1513C>T SNP in intron 2 increased the strength of a cryptic site from −5.9 to 3.1. For additional SNPs present on CYP2D6*41B, see Figure 1. This allele was not observed in any other African American or Caucasian subject, making it a rare event with a frequency of f<0.001.
The subject’s second allele was designated CYP2D6*46 and contained two nonsynonymous SNPs (77G>A, R26H; 1716G>A, E155K), two synonymous SNPs (2575C>A, 3254T>C) and a number of intronic and upstream SNPs as summarized in Figure 1.
The participant’s EM phenotype for dextromethorphan/ dextrorphan (DM/DX ratio = 0.005) and tramadol pharmacokinetic profile were comparable to those of other children carrying two functional alleles, suggesting that both new alleles were correctly spliced and encode fully functional protein (Figure 2 and Table 1).
Figure 2.

Genotype to phenotype correlation in heterozygous subjects with CYP2D6*45A, *45B and *46 alleles. Phenotype is expressed as metabolic urinary ratio of DM/DX. PM status is defined as DM/DX>0.3 (gray rectangle). Three subjects (shaded diamonds) were genotyped as CYP2D6*5/*45B with DM/DX ratios of 0.01, 0.123 and 0.764 (discordant case), respectively. Two subjects were CYP2D6*5/*46, both with DM/DX of 0.015. The open triangle denotes the subject with a CYP2D6*41B/*45A genotype and a DM/DX ratio of 0.005. Symbols for subjects with similar DM/DX ratios were offset above and below the line.
Table 1.
Total body exposure (AUC) estimates for tramadol and metabolites
| Two functional alleles (n = 8) | One functional allele (n = 4) | Case 1*41B/*46 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tramadol (ng h/ml) | 1633.5±250.5 | 1677.0±954.6 | 1049.3 |
| O-desmethyl tramadol M1 (ng h/ml)a | 504.0±222.2 | 322.5±179.3 | 757.2 |
| N-desmethyl tramadol M2 (ng h/ml) | 195.0±137.0 | 236.4±223.1 | 173.9 |
| di-N-O-desmethyl tramadol M5 (ng h/ml)a | 128.4±61.4 | 92.8±53.7 | 233.8 |
Data represented as mean±SD.
Metabolites mediated by CYP2D6.
Case 2
This case (subject 259 in Gaedigk et al24) had an initial CYP2D6*2/*5 genotype assignment, which was revised to *5/*41 upon further testing, but remained discordant with the individual’s PM phenotype (DM/DX ratio = 0.764). Cloning and sequencing of the CYP2D6*41 allele revealed multiple sequence variations including a TGTG deletion in the 5′-upstream region at position −692 and an E155K substitution (1716G>A) that was also found in CYP2D6*46 in case 1 (Figure 1). This variant allele was designated CYP2D6*45B by the CYP Nomenclature Committee.4
SNP and allele frequencies and haplotypes
To establish SNP and allele frequencies and SNP haplotypes, an African American study population comprising 251 subjects (excluding case 1, not part of this study cohort) was regenotyped for −692TGTG, 77G>A (R26H) and 1716G>A (E155K). Only a partial association was found between −692TGTG and 1716G>A, suggesting the existence of an allele that carries 1716G>A, but lacks the deletion. Such an allele was confirmed by cloning and sequencing and was designated CYP2D6*45A (Figure 1). The 2575C>A, 2661G>A and 3254T>C were always linked with 1716G>A. In contrast, 77A was found either in linkage with the latter SNPs or on a CYP2D6*1 background (n = 5; revised from CYP2D6*1 to *43 according to CYP2D6 nomenclature). Furthermore, 77A was also detected on two CYP2D6*41 alleles, which are provisionally termed *41 +77A in this report. All subjects carrying −692TGTG were positive for 1716G>A, 2575C>A, 266G>A and 3254T>C, but negative for 77G>A. All four new alleles also lack the intron 1 conversion that appears to be present in other CYP2D6*2 ‘backbone’ alleles such as CYP2D6*2 and *41. Allele and SNP frequencies are given in Table 2.
Table 2.
CYP2D6 allele (A) and SNP (B) frequencies in n = 251 African American subjects regenotyped for −692del, 77G>A and 1716G>A
| n | Frequency | |
|---|---|---|
| (A) CYP2D6 allele | ||
| *45A (1716A) | 9 | 0.018 |
| *45B (1716A, −692del) | 8 | 0.016 |
| *46 (1716A, 77A) | 3 | 0.006 |
| *43 (77A) | 5 | 0.001 |
| *41 (+77A) | 2 | 0.004 |
| (B) SNP | ||
| −692TGTG del | 8 | 0.016 |
| 77G>A | 10 | 0.020 |
| 1716G>A | 20 | 0.040 |
The −692TGTG deletion was associated with 1716A, while 77A was found in three different haplotypes. CYP2D6*41 alleles positive for 77A were not sequenced and referred herein as *41+77A.
In addition, SNP 3030G>A in intron 6 was found only on one of the two sequenced CYP2D6*46 alleles (Figure 1). Genotype analysis did not reveal this SNP on any other CYP2D6*46 or CYP2D6*45 allele. On the other hand, an upstream SNP (−1011T>C) was present on six CYP2D6*45A alleles including the one that was sequenced, but was absent in three others. An AAG haplotype for −1543A, −1298A and −1235G was found in the sequenced CYP2D6*46 and *45B alleles and confirmed by genotyping in all such alleles. In contrast, the sequenced CYP2D6*45A lacked those SNPs, but genotyping confirmed their presence in the other CYP-2D6*45A alleles, indicating that these alleles vary within their upstream region. Within positions −1740 and −4029, SNP patterns were identical for CYP2D6*41B, *45B and *46 sequences, but again differed for the CYP2D6*45A allele. It is worth noting that none of the new alleles were positive for −1584G.
In vitro expression and activity
To evaluate functional consequences of the nonsynonymous SNPs in CYP2D6*45A and *46, pcDNA constructs coding for CYP2D6.2 (R296C, S486T; positive control), CYP2D6.45A (E155K, R296C, S486T) and CYP2D6.46 (R26H, E155K, R296C, S486T) proteins, respectively, were expressed in COS-7 cells. Microsomal membranes were prepared and DM O-demethylase (CYP2D6.2, CYP2D6.45A and CYP2D6.46) and bufuralol 1′-hydroxylase activities (CYP2D6.2 and CYP2D6.46) were determined. As shown in Table 3, Km, Vmax and Clint (Vmax/Km) are comparable to CYP2D6.2 control values, suggesting that both isozymes are functional. These findings are in agreement with in vivo tramadol kinetic data of the subject described above (Table 1) and two CYP2D6*5/*46 EM subjects with a DM/DX ratio of 0.015 (Figure 2).
Table 3.
Mean kinetic parameters for dextromethorphanO-demethylation and bufuralol 1′-hydroxylation by CYP2D6.2, CYP2D6.45A and CYP2D6.46 expressed in COS-7 cells
|
Dextromethorphan O-demethylation |
Bufurolol 1′-hydroxylation |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Kma | Vmaxb | Vmax/Kmc × 1000 | Kma | Vmaxb | Vmax/Kmc ×1000 |
| CYP2D6.2 | 0.505 | 15.5 | 30.7 | 0.547 | 38.6 | 70.6 |
| CYP2D6.45A | 0.388 | 17.1 | 22.5 | ND | ND | ND |
| CYP2D6.46 | 0.464 | 16.8 | 36.2 | 0.419 | 33.0 | 78.8 |
Micromolar,
pmol/pmol P450/min and
μl/pmol P450/min.
ND, not determined.
Gene reporter assays
The −692TGTG deletion was assessed by luciferase reporter assays in HepG2 and IMR-32 cells (Figure 3). The deletion was without effect in both cell lines. In addition, a search in the TRANSFAC v6.4 database did not reveal any transcription factor binding sites for the sequence within the region where the TGTG deletion is located. A construct containing −1584G was also assessed and exhibited higher luciferase activity compared to −1584C or −1584C + −692TGTG controls in both cell lines. The increase, however, was significant (P≤0.001) in IMR-32 cells only.
Figure 3.

Luciferase reporter assays in transiently transfected HepG2 and IMR-32 cells. Constructs contain the SNPs as indicated below respective columns. The −692wt refers to TGTG at −692 and − 692del to the deletion of TGTG at that position. The −692wt/−1584C ‘rev’ served as negative control with the promoter sequence inserted in reverse orientation. Renilla-normalized luciferase activity is expressed as the mean±SD of triplicate determinations in a single experiment. Similar results were obtained in at least one additional transfection experiment. *Significant difference (P ≤ 0.001) compared to −692wt/−1584C in IMR-32 cells and HepG2 cells, respectively.
Expression of CYP2D6*45B mRNA
To demonstrate that CYP2D6*45B mRNA is indeed expressed as implied by the transient transfection experiments, a bank of human prenatal liver samples was genotyped for CYP2D6 and two prenatal specimens heterozygous for CYP*1/*45B and *2/*45B genotypes were identified. In both cases, presence of CYP2D6*45B-derived cDNA was indirectly verified by the presence of the G>A SNP at position 1716. Additional evidence that the TGTG deletion did not affect transcription was provided by phenotyping data from two African American children. Both had the same genotype as the discordant case (CYP2D6*5/*45B), and had recently been phenotyped on multiple occasions with DM. In contrast to the discordant case, both children were consistently EM or IM (Figure 2).
DISCUSSION
Over recent years, we and other investigators have continuously encountered African American and African subjects who presented with genotype-discordant phenotypes and have classified them as ‘outliers’.21–24 Possible explanations for this phenomenon include drug interactions, environmental factors (eg food, natural food supplements),31 and foremost, genetic factors, specifically the presence of unknown sequence variation(s). In order for 5–10% of a population to function phenotypically as PMs, 22–32% of alleles in that population must be nonfunctional. However, a relatively low frequency (13.3%) of nonfunctional alleles (ie CYP2D6*3, *4, *5, *6 and *40) has been found,24 suggesting that a significant proportion of nonfunctional alleles may have gone undetected in our African American population. The presence of additional variants was demonstrated earlier by the discovery of CYP2D6*40 within the population now further studied24 and CYP2D6*42 in an ‘outlier’ subject who had participated in another study.32 CYP2D6*42 has also been found in two subjects of this cohort providing an explanation for their IM DM/DX ratio.
A better understanding of the heterogeneity of the CYP2D6 locus in African Americans is necessary to more reliably predict phenotype from genotype data in African populations and their descendents. To that end, studies of discordant ‘outlier’ subjects provide the best opportunity of identifying new allelic variants. To search for sequence variations, we expanded our focus beyond the coding and flanking intron sequences of the gene and included 4.2 kb of upstream sequence as well as the entire intronic sequences into the analysis. As summarized by Grant in a recent commentary,33 more distant regions (potentially harboring regulatory elements) ought to be included into any thorough investigation, in addition to the immediate vicinity of the transcription start site that usually contains core promoter elements. Indeed, regulatory elements have been found within 500 bp of the CYP2D6 transcription start site,34 a region that appears to be devoid of SNPs (Figure 1, and unpublished data). On the other hand, the presence of SNPs within introns (outside ‘flanking intronic regions’) can also effectively influence mRNA splicing and hence abolish enzyme activity as demonstrated by Kuehl et al35 in the evaluation of the CYP3A5*3 allelic variant. To our knowledge, no such SNPs have been described for CYP2D6.
Ultimately, the study identified four new allelic variants, CYP2D6*41B, *45A, *45B and *46. The first, CYP2D6*41B, constitutes a subvariant of CYP2D6*41 since it carries one additional synonymous SNP within the coding region. Information theory-based splice site analysis, which has successfully been used in the past to accurately predict alternate splice events,30,36,37 did not reveal a change in strength that would predict a loss or weakening of the exon 3 donor splice site. In fact, this site is 2.4-fold stronger than the average splice site. In contrast, a second SNP located in intron 2 created a cryptic splice donor site (Ri = 3.1 bits) that conceivably could be an alternative to the exon 2 donor (3.7 bits). Numerous other donor sites with bit values >3.1 are located upstream of this particular site, however, and are apparently not favored over the natural exon 2 donor site. Hence, 1513C>T likely is of minimal functional consequence. Furthermore, in vivo phenotyping data suggest that this allele is correctly and efficiently spliced, yielding mRNA levels comparable to those transcribed from other functional alleles such as CYP2D6*1 or *2. Indeed, the subject exhibited activity toward tramadol (M1 and M5 metabolite formation are mediated by CYP2D6) that was among the highest observed, whereas heterozygous subjects with one nonfunctional allele were significantly different. CYP2D6*41B appears to be extremely rare (only one allele observed to date); therefore, a ‘default’ assignment of CYP2D6*41 in the absence of testing for 1757C>T likely predicts an accurate phenotype. As such, genotyping for this variant is neither cost-effective nor would it be expected to improve phenotype prediction.
CYP2D6*45A, *45B and *46 share a novel nonsynonymous SNP (1716G>A, E155K), two synonymous SNPs and one intronic SNP. CYP2D6*46 carries a second amino-acid substitution (R26H) and is therefore a separate allelic entity. Both CYP2D6*45 and *46 encode functional protein as demonstrated by preliminary kinetic characterization of COS-7 cell expressed protein. Neither E155K alone nor E155K in combination with R26H appears to have an effect on activity when compared to CYP2D6.2. These in vitro findings are further supported by phenotype data, for example, EM status of two subjects whose activity is derived from CYP2D6*46 only, since their second allele contains the CYP2D6*5 gene deletion. Splice site analysis was also performed for the SNPs unique to CYP2D6*45 and *46, but did not indicate that any splice sites are generated by those sequence variations (data not shown). Additional studies, however, are warranted to characterize CYP2D6.45 and CYP2D6.46 proteins in more detail, for example, in comparison to other isoenzymes.
The in vitro kinetic data also infer that the previously described CYP2D6*43 allele that carries R26H, but lacks other SNPs, encodes a functional gene product. CYP2D6*43 was initially designated *21, but has been revised to *43 by the nomenclature committee; however, no information has been listed regarding its function.4
The four nucleotide deletion at position −692 in CYP2D6*45B is the only sequence variation across the 9 kb fragment that is unique to this allele and conceivably could lead to PM status. Since this variant was first discovered in a discordant case in conjunction with a null allele, we hypothesized that the deletion may interfere with gene expression, and thus explain the discordance and reveal regions important for CYP2D6 regulation. To test this hypothesis, luciferase reporter constructs containing 2.6 kb of the CYP2D6 5′-upstream region were assessed in two cell lines, HepG2 and IMR-32. Since hepatoma-derived cell lines such as HepG2 do not express CYP2D6 or other drug-metabolizing P450 enzymes, transient transfection outcomes should be viewed with caution. Therefore, the neuroblastoma-derived IMR-32 cells were chosen as a second system as they have successfully been utilized for induction studies of another cytochrome P450 enzyme, namely CYP2E1.38 Since results from both systems were consistent, we concluded that transcription levels likely are not affected by the −692TGTG deletion, although independent confirmation in cell lines where CYP2D6 is constitutively expressed would be desirable.
Expression of CYP2D6*45B-derived mRNA was also demonstrated in two prenatal liver tissue samples, further suggesting that the deletion does not affect mRNA transcription. In addition, two African American children with CYP2D6*5/*45B genotypes had intermediate and extensive metabolizer phenotypes (DM/DM ratios of 0.123 and 0.01) due to activity derived from their CYP2D6*45B allele. Taken together, the evidence is overwhelming that the −692TGTG deletion does not lead to PM status and cannot explain the discordant phenotype in the investigated case. An unreported drug interaction event may have caused the discordance in this 67-year-old male participant who may not have disclosed all the medications/supplements or special diets to which he was exposed at the time of phenotyping. Unfortunately, a reassessment of his phenotype was not possible. Based on this conclusion, the frequency of PM subjects with this African American population is lower at 6.74% as originally reported (7.25%).24
Traditionally, PM subjects are identified by the presence of two nonfunctional alleles. Alternatively, accurate phenotype prediction may also be achieved by exclusion of PM status by positive identification of at least one functional allele. As previously demonstrated, subjects carrying one or two −1584G alleles were EM or IM, ruling out PM status in 43% of Caucasians and 12% of African Americans studied.27 Based on the frequency of the CYP2D6*45- and *46-associated 1716G>A SNP (f = 0.04), approximately 8% of an African American population carries at least one such allele. The assessment of both SNPs, −1584C>G and 1716G>A, allowed the exclusion of PM status in 20% of our African American population comprising 251 individuals. Future genotyping studies will include those SNPs to further evaluate their reliability to exclude PM status.
Even though the positive predictive value of a −1584G- or 1716A-containing genotype was 1.0 for the African American population investigated (assuming that the ‘discordant’ case was indeed nongenetic in nature and due, for example, to a drug interaction), this strategy should be applied to other populations with caution only. Additional (larger) studies in populations from different geographical locations and ethnic backgrounds are warranted to further establish the accuracy of prediction of those SNPs. Given the highly polymorphic nature of the CYP2D gene locus and the recombination events that have occurred between the 2D8, 2D7 and 2D6 genes, clearly one has to anticipate that SNPs that are now defining one or more allelic variants may also be present on different haplotypes. Indeed, Raimundo et al39 reported the −1584C>G SNP on a single CYP2D6*4 and a single CYP2D6*8 allele in Caucasians, suggesting that this SNP may rather be used as a quick initial screening tool rather than a definitive phenotype predictor.
Nonetheless, further characterization of the remaining discordant cases and resequencing of additional allelic variants and SNP correlation studies should ultimately allow reliable CYP2D6 phenotype prediction in African Americans, African populations and their descendents.
METHODS
Study Subjects
This study utilized existing DNA samples and phenotyping data from subjects enrolled in two previously conducted, IRB-approved investigations performed at the Children’s Mercy Hospital and the Morehouse School of Medicine. The African American population utilized in this study included a total of 252 individuals (n = 191 with parents and grandparents identified as African American and n = 61 subjects who reported admixture in their parents or grandparents or descent was unknown). Genotyping data were presented previously 7,24,27,29,32 and have been updated to include results for new allelic variants described herein.
CYP2D6 Phenotyping
Briefly, a predose urine sample was collected and the study participants administered a single oral dose of DM (0.3 mg/ kg as Tussin® Cough Syrup (Osco Drug, Oak Brook, IL, USA), 15 mg DM per 5 ml of solution). All urine produced during the ensuing 4 h period was collected and an aliquot stored at −20°C until analysis. The urinary concentrations of DM and its O-demethylated metabolite, DX, were determined using HPLC with fluorescence detection as described previously.40 DM/DX ratios >0.3 were used to indicate a PM phenotype. In a single individual, a tramadol biodisposition profile was available in addition to a DM/DX ratio. The pharmacokinetic and statistical analyses applied to this individual have been described previously.29
CYP2D6 Genotyping
Blood was collected into ACD-containing vacutainers (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and high-quality genomic DNA isolated with a QIAamp blood DNA kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Allele designation and nucleotide numbering is assigned according to http://www.imm.ki.se/CYPalleles/.4
CYP2D6 genotyping was performed as described previously7,24,27,32 and comprised the following alleles: CYP2D6*2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8, *9, *10, *11, *12, *14, *15, *17, *18, *29, *35, *40, *41 and *42, as well as *1 × 2, *2 × 2 and *4 ×2 gene duplications. For regenotyping purposes, a 6.6 kb fragment that encompasses the entire CYP2D6 gene and upstream sequence was amplified by long-range PCR using JumpStart AccuTaq DNA polymerase (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and primers 5′-ATG GCA GCT GCC ATA CAA TCC ACC TG (forward, AY545216: 2367–2392) and 5′-ACT GAG CCC TGG GAG GTA GGT AG (reverse, AY545216: 8931–8953). Annealing and extension were at 68°C for 7 min in the presence of 5% DMSO. The resulting PCR product was diluted at least 1000-fold to serve as template for the series of PCR-RFLP-based genotyping assays.
To identify SNPs associated with CYP2D6*41, *45A, *45B and *46, PCR-RFLP-based assays similar in design to those developed previously were established. All assays were performed with JumpStart REDTaq DNA polymerase (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and the accompanying buffer with details for the individual assays provided in Table 4. PCR reaction volumes were 8 μl and digestion volumes were 16 μl. Diagnostic restriction patterns were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis (3% agarose gels containing Synergel, Diversified Biotech, Boston, MA, USA) and documented with a Kodak 440 CF Image Station (Eastman Kodak Co., New Haven, CT, USA).
Table 4.
PCR-RFLP-based genotyping assays performed to detect SNPs associated with CYP2D6*45A, *45B and *46
| SNP | Primers | Ann (°C) | Restriction enzyme | RFLP ref pattern (bp) | RFLP var pattern (bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1011T>C | AGA ATT AGG CTG GGT GGT GC
GAC ATG CAC AGA CGC TAT GC |
F
R |
55 | AciI | 662 | 437+225 |
| −692TGTGdel | GTC TGT GTA TGT GTG AAT ATT GTC caT G
CTT ATC TGT CAC TGG CAC TTA CC |
F
R |
58 | NcoI | 240 | 216+24 |
| 77G>A | GGC AGG TAT GGG GCT AGA AGC ACT GG
CAA ACC TGC TTC CCC TTC TCA GCC |
F
R |
58 | HhaI | 226+84 | 310 |
| 1716G>A | CTG GGC AAG AAG TCG CTG GAG CAG TGG GcG gCC
CAG AGA CTC CTC GGT CTC TCG |
F
R |
58
58 |
BsiEI | 323+32 | 355 |
| GCC CTG TGA CCA GCT GGA CAG AGC C
TTG GCG AAG GCG GCA CAA AGG CAG GCG GCa agC T |
F
R |
HindIII | 271 | 237+34 | ||
| 1716G>A (cDNA) | CCA GAT CCT GGG TTT CGG G
TTG GCG AAG GCG GCA CAA AGG CAG GCG GCa agC T |
F
R |
58 | HindIII | 177 | 143+34 |
| 2575C>A | TGA GCA CAG GAT GAC CTG GGA CCC AGC Cgg GCC
GAT GGG CTC ACG CTG CAC ATC |
F
R |
56 | ApaI | 387+32 | 419 |
| 2661G>A | ACG GTG GGG GGC AAG GGT GGT GGc TcG A
CAG GTT CTC ATC ATT GAA GCT GC |
F
R |
62 | XhoI | 193+24 | 217 |
| 3030G>A | TTC TGT CCC GAG TAT GCT C
CGT CGT CGA TCT CCT GTT GGA CAC G |
F
R |
52 | AvaI | 246+156+7 | 402+7 |
| 3254T>C | GCT CAC ATG CCC TAC ACC ACT GCC GTG ATg CA
GCT ATC ACC AGG TGC TGG |
F
R |
56 | NsiI | 145+30 | 175 |
The first column indicates SNPs and their positions. Assays are carried out on CYP2D6-containing long-range PCR templates, unless stated otherwise. Primers are given 5′–3′, ‘F’ and ‘R’ refer to forward and reverse. Partial restriction sites built into primers are in bold with sequence mismatches in lower case. Annealing temperatures (ann.) are as listed. For 1716G>A, two assays were used: the first allows restriction of 1716G-derived fragments, whereas the second assay allows restriction of fragments that carry 1716A. Fragment sizes are in base pairs (bp), ‘ref’ and ‘var’ refer to the reference and variant RFLP patterns, respectively.
The 1757C>T SNP associated with CYP2D6*41B was detected while testing for CYP2D6*8.24 The 1757T interferes with the restriction recognition sites partially provided by the primers such that PCR products generated from CYP2D6*41B remain uncut in both the wild-type and mutation-detecting assays.
Primers for PCR, genotyping and sequencing were obtained from Sigma Genosys (The Woodlands, TX, USA).
CYP2D6 Gene Cloning and Sequence Analysis
PCR fragments (9 kb long) were generated from genomic DNA with JumpStart AccuTaq DNA polymerase in the presence of 5% DMSO, a forward primer binding to 3731–3754 of X90926 that corresponds to 1–24 of AY545216 and the reverse primer used to generate the 6.6 kb fragment (see above). Primers were annealed at 63°C and extended for 10 min at 68°C. The PCR product was cloned into the pCR-XL-TOPO vector according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Clone inserts were characterized for integrity, and if necessary, allele identification by genotyping for at least three SNPs (eg −1584C>G, 1716C>T, 2850C>T) and by EcoRI digestion to assure presence of a full-length insert. For sequencing experiments, at least five plasmid clones were pooled to minimize visualization of PCR errors that may have been introduced during the amplification process. Sequencing was performed with appropriately spaced primers, DYEnamic ET dye terminator chemistry and a MegaBACE 500 capillary sequencer (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Sequence variations were confirmed either by direct resequencing of nested PCR products generated from newly amplified 9 kb or 6.6 kb templates or by PCR-RFLP analysis thereof. Sequence analysis for the novel alleles covered 9 kb and included: 4.2 kb upstream of the ATG start codon, coding regions, intronic regions and 535 nucleotides downstream of the TAG stop codon.
In vitro CYP2D6.45A and CYP2D6.46 Protein Expression and Activity
The 1716G>A and 77G>A nucleotide substitutions were subsequently introduced by site-directed mutagenesis into an existing CYP2D6*2 complementary DNA in the pcDNA3.1/Hygro vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to produce CYP2D6.45 and CYP2D6.46 cDNA expression constructs. Clone integrity was established by sequence analysis prior to transfection experiments. COS-7 cell expression, microsome preparation and activity determination with DM and bufuralol were carried out as described earlier for CYP2D6.1, .2, .17 and .29.24,41 DM (n = 10) and bufuralol (n = 7) concentrations ranged between 0 and 100 μM and 0 and 200 μM, respectively. Data presented for DM and bufuralol biotransformation by CYP2D6 variants represent the mean of duplicate transfection experiments, whereas data for CYP2D6.2 (which served as positive control) are from accompanying, single transfection experiments. Microsomal incubations were performed in duplicate over the aforementioned range of substrate concentrations for each transfection experiment. Kinetic parameters for metabolite formation were estimated from the line of best fit using least-squares regression analysis of Lineweaver–Burk plots (reciprocal substrate concentration vs reciprocal velocity).
Characterization of the CYP2D6*45B −692TGTG Deletion by Transient Transfection Experiments
A 2573 bp fragment was generated by long-range PCR from the genotype to phenotype discordant subject (case 2, CYP2D6*5/*45B), cloned with the TOPO XL PCR cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and designated −1584C/−692del. The primers were CAT ctc GAG CAA TGC ACA GAG ATC CAG (forward, AY545216: 1615–1641) and CCA ctc GaG CTC CTC TGG ACA CAC CTG G (reverse, AY545216: 4160–4187) and contained mismatches generating XhoI sites as indicated in bold and lower case. Inserts with −1584C/−692wt and −1584G/−692wt but otherwise identical were subsequently created by consecutive rounds of site-directed mutagenesis. The sequence was confirmed before inserts were released by XhoI and cloned into the XhoI site of pGL3-Basic (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). A plasmid containing the −1584C/−692wt insert in reverse orientation and vector without insert served as negative controls.
The human neuroblastoma cell line IMR-32 (ATCC# CCL-127) was a gift from Dr RF Tyndale (University of Toronto, ON, Canada); HepG2 cells were purchased from ATCC. Transfection reagents were from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA. Cells were cultured in 12-well plates to ~60% confluence and transient transfections were carried out with Lipofectamine transfection reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, construct plasmid (1600 ng for IMR-32, 200 ng for HepG2), 50 ng Renilla luciferase plasmid (pRL-TK, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and 5 μl Plus reagent were incubated in 50 μl serum-free medium for 15 min at room temperature. Serum-free medium (50 μl) containing 4 μl and 2 μl Lipofectamine reagent for IMR-32 and HepG2 cells, respectively, was then added and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. After removing the growth medium, cells were overlaid with 400 μl serum-free medium and 100 μl of the transfection solution. After a 3 h incubation at 37°C, 2 ml of medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum was used to overlay the IMR-32 cells and replace the medium on the HepG2 cells. Cell extracts were prepared 24 h after transfection in Passive Lysis Buffer and luciferase activity measured on a Lumat LB 9507 luminometer using the Dual Luciferase Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Statistical analysis was performed with a one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s test.
CYP2D6*45B Expression in Prenatal Human Liver Tissue
Prenatal human liver tissues collected with post-mortem intervals less than 4 h were obtained from the Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA and the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Use of these tissues was approved by the University of Missouri-Kansas city Pediatric Health Sciences Review Board. Total RNA was extracted from two samples genotyped as CYP2D6*1/*45B and *2/*45B, respectively, with an RNeasy Mini Kit in conjunction with an on-column DNaseI treatment (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Subsequently, 1.5 μg were reverse transcribed with the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis system for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). cDNA (0.5 μl) was used for amplification and subsequent genotyping for 1716C>T (Table 4).
Automated Splice Site Analysis
Splice site analyses evaluating changes in splice site strength based on information theory-based models were recently described for CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A5 splicing mutations.30 The model applied to the current investigation has been updated based on the April 2003 release of the Human Genome Sequence (Build 331) and includes 111 772 donor and 108 079 acceptor sites (V Nalla and PK Rogan: Automated splice site analysis, https://splice.cmh.edu). The model implies that a sequence with an Ri value <0 bit is not a splice site, while the maximum information in the consensus sequence is 11.79 bits. The average splice site strength is 6.73 bits.
Acknowledgments
We thank Roger Gaedigk, PhD and Peter K Rogan, PhD for continuous support and advice and Darren W Baker, BS for technical support. We further express our gratitude to Rachel F Tyndale, PhD for her generous gift of IMR-32 cells and to John T Wilson, MD and Gregory L Kearns, PharmD, PhD who served as the Principal Investigators for the pediatric studies of tramadol. This project was supported in part by intramural grants from the Katherine B Richardson Associates Endowment Fund (AG and SWA) and the National Institute of Child Health Human Development (Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit Network) and RO1ES10855-04 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
References
- 1.Scordo MG, Spina E. Cytochrome P450 polymorphisms and response to antipsychotic therapy. Pharmacogenomics. 2002;3:201–218. doi: 10.1517/14622416.3.2.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yu AM, Idle JR, Herraiz T, Kupfer A, Gonzalez FJ. Screening for endogenous substrates reveals that CYP2D6 is a 5-methoxyindolethylamine O-demethylase. Pharmacogenetics. 2003;13:307–319. doi: 10.1097/01.fpc.0000054094.48725.b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yu AM, Idle JR, Krausz KW, Kupfer A, Gonzalez FJ. Contribution of individual cytochrome P450 isozymes to the O-demethylation of the psychotropic beta-carboline alkaloids harmaline and harmine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;305:315–322. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.047050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.http://www.imm.ki.se/CYPalleles/default.htmCytochrome
- 5.Sachse C, Brockmöller J, Bauer S, Roots I. Cytochrome P450 2D6 variants in a Caucasian population: allele frequencies and phenotypic consequences. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:284–295. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Griese E-U, Zanger UM, Brudermanns U, Gaedigk A, Mikus G, Mörike K, et al. Assessment of the predictive power of genotypes for the in vivo catalytic function of CYP2D6 in a Caucasian population. Pharmacogenetics. 1998;8:15–26. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199802000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gaedigk A, Gotschall RR, Forbes NS, Simon SD, Leeder JS. Optimization of cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) phenotype assignment using a genotyping algorithm based on allele frequency data. Pharmacogenetics. 1999;9:669–682. doi: 10.1097/01213011-199912000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chou W-H, Yan F-X, Robbins-Weilert DK, Ryder TB, Liu WW, Perbost C, et al. Comparison of two CYP2D6 genotyping methods and assessment of genotype–phenotype relationships. Clin Chem. 2003;49:542–551. doi: 10.1373/49.4.542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Johansson I, Lundqvist E, Dahl M-L, Ingelman-Sundberg M. PCR-based genotyping for duplicated and deleted CYP2D6 genes. Pharmacogenetics. 1996;6:351–355. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199608000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kubota T, Yamaura Y, Ohkawa N, Hara H, Chiba K. Frequencies of CYP2D6 mutant alleles in a normal Japanese population and metabolic activity of dextromethorphan O-demethylation in diferent CYP2D6 genotypes. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50:31–34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00209.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yokoi T, Kosaka Y, Chida M, Chiba K, Nakamura H, Ishizaki T, et al. A new CYP2D6 allele with a nine base insertion in exon 9 in a Japanese population associated with poor metabolizer phenotype. Pharmacogenetics. 1996;6:395–401. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199610000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang S-L, Lai M-D, Huang J-D. G169R mutation diminishes the metabolic activity of CYP2D6 in Chinese. Drug Metab Dipos. 1999;27:385–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chida M, Yokoi T, Nemoto N, Inaba M, Kinoshita M, Kamataki T. A new variant CYP2D6 allele (CYP2D6*21) with a single base insertion in exon 5 in a Japanese population associated with a poor metabolizer phenotype. Pharmacogenetics. 1999;9:287–293. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199906000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shimada T, Tsumura F, Yamasaki H, Guengerich FP, Inoue K. Characterization of (±)-bufuralol hydroxylation activities in liver microsomes of Japanese and Caucasian subjects genotyped for CYP2D. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11:143–156. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200103000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ji L, Pan S, Wu J, Marti-Jaun J, Hersberger M. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 in Chinese mainland. Chin Med J. 2002;115:1780–1784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chida M, Ariyoshi N, Yokoi T, Nemoto N, Inaba M, Kinoshita M, et al. New allelic arrangement CYP2D6*36 × 2 found in a Japanese poor metabolizer of debrisoquine. Pharmacogenetics. 2002;12:559–562. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200211000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lennard MS, Iyun AO, Jackson PR, Tucker GT, Woods HF. Evidence for a dissociation in the control of sparteine, debrisoquine and metoprolol metabolism in Nigerians. Pharmacogenetics. 1992;2:89–92. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199204000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Simooya OO, Njunju E, Hodjegan AR, Lennard MS, Tucker GT. Debrisoquine and metoprolol oxidation in Zambians: a population study. Pharmacogenetics. 1993;3:205–208. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199308000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Masimirembwa C, Hasler J, Bertilsson L, Johansson I, Ekberg O, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Phenotype and genotype analysis of debrisoquine hydroxylase (CYP2D6) in a black Zimbabwean population. Reduced enzyme activity and evaluation of metabolic correlation of CYP2D6 probe drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1996b;51:117–122. doi: 10.1007/s002280050170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Droll K, Bruce-Mensah K, Otton SV, Gaedigk A, Sellers EM, Tyndale RF. Comparison of three CYP2D6 probe substrates and genotype in Ghanaians, Chinese, and Caucasians. Pharmacogenetics. 1998;8:325–333. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199808000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leathart JBS, London SJ, Steward A, Adams JD, Idle JR, Daly AK. CYP2D6 phenotype–genotype relationships in African-Americans and Caucasians in Los Angeles. Pharmacogenetics. 1998;8:529–541. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199812000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Griese U-E, Asante-Poku S, Ofori-Adjei D, Mikus G, Eichelbaum M. Analysis of the CYP2D6 gene mutations and their consequences for enzyme function in a West African population. Pharmacogenetics. 1999;9:715–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wan Y-JY, Poland RE, Han G, Konishi T, Zheng Y-P, Berman N, et al. Analysis of the CYP2D6 gene polymorphism and enzyme activity in African-Americans in Southern California. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11:489–499. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200108000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gaedigk A, Bradford LD, Marcucci KA, Leeder JS. Unique CYP2D6 activity distribution and genotype–phenotype discordance in African Americans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;72:76–89. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.125783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Raimundo S, Fischer J, Eichelbaum M, Griese E-U, Schwab M, Zanger UM. Elucidation of the genetic basis of the common ‘intermediate metabolizer’ phenotype for drug oxidation by CYP2D6. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10:577–581. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200010000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zanger UM, Fischer J, Raimundo S, Stüven T, Evert BO, Schwab M, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the genetic factors determining expression and function of hepatic CYP2D6. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11:573–585. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200110000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gaedigk A, Ryder DL, Bradford LD, Leeder JS. CYP2D6 poor metabolizer status can be ruled out by a single genotyping assay testing for the −1584G promoter polymorphism. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1008–1011. doi: 10.1373/49.6.1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kimura S, Umeno M, Skoda RC, Meyer UA, Gonzalez FJ. The human debrisoquine 4-hydroxylase (CYP2D) locus: sequence and identification of the polymorphic CYP2D6 gene, a related gene, and a pseudogene. Am J Hum Genet. 1989;45:889–904. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abdel-Rahman SM, Leeder JS, Wilson JT, Gaedigk A, Gotschall RR, Medve R, et al. Concordance between tramadol and dextromethorphan parent/metabolite ratios: the influence of CYP2D6 and non-CYP2D6 pathways on biotransformation. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;42:24–29. doi: 10.1177/0091270002042001002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rogan PK, Svojanovsky S, Leeder JS. Information theory-based analysis of CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A5 splicing mutations. Pharmacogenetics. 2003;13:207–218. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200304000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aklillu E, Herrlin K, Gustafsson LL, Bertilsson L, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Evidence for environmental influence on CYP2D6-catalysed debrisoquine hydroxylation as demonstrated by phenotyping and genotyping of Ethiopians living in Ethiopia or in Sweden. Pharmacogenetics. 2002;12:375–383. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200207000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gaedigk A, Ndjountsche L, Gaedigk R, Bradford LD, Leeder JS. Discovery of a novel non-functional cytochrome P4502D6 allele, CYP2D6*42, in AfricanAmericans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;73:575–576. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00067-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Grant DM. Pharmacogenetics and the regulation of gene transcription. Phamacogenetics. 2004;14:391–393. doi: 10.1097/01.fpc.0000114752.08559.a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cairns W, Smith CAD, McLaren AW, Wolf CR. Characterization of the human cytochrome P4502D6 promoter. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:25269–25276. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.41.25269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kuehl P, Zhang J, Lin Y, Lamba J, Assem M, Schuetz J, et al. Sequence diversity in CYP3A promoters and characterization of the genetic basis of polymorphic CYP3A5 expression. Nat Genet. 2001;27:383–391. doi: 10.1038/86882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rogan PK, Faux BM, Schneider TD. Information analysis of human splice site mutations. Hum Mutat. 1998;12:153–171. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1998)12:3<153::AID-HUMU3>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vockley J, Rogan PK, Anderson BD, Willard J, Seelan RS, Smith DI, et al. Exon skipping in IVD RNA processing in isovaleric acidemia caused by point mutations in the coding region of the IVD gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:356–367. doi: 10.1086/302751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Howard LA, Miksys S, Hoffmann E, Mash D, Tyndale RF. Brain CYP2E1 is induced by nicotine and ethanol in rat and is higher in smokers and alcoholics. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;138:1376–1386. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Raimundo S, Toscano C, Klein K, Fischer J, Griese E-U, Eichelbaum M, et al. A novel intronic mutation, 2988G>A, with high predictivity for impaired function of cytochrome P450 2D6 in white subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther (CPT) 2004;76:128–138. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Abdel-Rahman SM, Gotschall RR, Kauffman RE, Leeder JS, Kearns GL. Investigation of terbinafine as a CYP2D6 inhibitor in vivo. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;65:465–472. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70065-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marcucci KA, Pearce RE, Crespi C, Leeder JS, Gaedigk A. Characterization of cytochrome P450 2D6.1 (CYP2D6.1), CYP2D6.2 and CYP2D6. 17 activities toward model CYP2D6 substrates dextromethorphan, bufuralol, and debrisoquine. Drug Metab Dispos. 2002;30:1–7. doi: 10.1124/dmd.30.5.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
