Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1998 Sep;10(9):1511–1522. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.9.1511

A recessive heterochronic mutation, plastochron1, shortens the plastochron and elongates the vegetative phase in rice

JI Itoh 1, A Hasegawa 1, H Kitano 1, Y Nagato 1
PMCID: PMC144075  PMID: 9724697

Abstract

We describe two recessive alleles of a rice heterochronic gene, plastochron1-1 (pla1-1) and pla1-2, that reduce the length of the plastochron to approximately half that of the wild type. Because the onset of the reproductive phase in pla1 was not temporally affected, the number of leaves produced in the vegetative phase was nearly twice that produced in the wild type. Panicle development was severely disturbed in pla1 mutants. In pla1-1, many primordia of primary rachis branches were converted into vegetative shoots. These ectopic shoots repeated the initiation of panicle development and the conversion of primary rachis branches into shoots. In the weak allele pla1-2, however, only the basal one or two primordia developed as vegetative shoots, and the remaining primordia developed to produce a truncated panicle. These results indicate that both vegetative and reproductive programs are expressed simultaneously during the reproductive phase of pla1; however, the degree varied depending on the strength of the allele. Accordingly, pla1 is a heterochronic mutation that extends the vegetative period. The shoot apical meristem of pla1 was larger than that of the wild type, although the shape was not modified. An in situ hybridization experiment using the histone H4 gene as a probe revealed that cell divisions are accelerated in the pla1 meristem. The PLA1 gene is considered to regulate the duration of the vegetative phase by controlling the rate of leaf production in the meristem.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (694.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bassiri A., Irish E. E., Poethig R. S. Heterochronic Effects of Teopod 2 on the Growth and Photosensitivity of the Maize Shoot. Plant Cell. 1992 Apr;4(4):497–504. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.4.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark S. E., Jacobsen S. E., Levin J. Z., Meyerowitz E. M. The CLAVATA and SHOOT MERISTEMLESS loci competitively regulate meristem activity in Arabidopsis. Development. 1996 May;122(5):1567–1575. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.5.1567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dudley M., Poethig R. S. The effect of a heterochronic mutation, Teopod2, on the cell lineage of the maize shoot. Development. 1991 Mar;111(3):733–739. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.3.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Evans M. M., Poethig R. S. Gibberellins promote vegetative phase change and reproductive maturity in maize. Plant Physiol. 1995 Jun;108(2):475–487. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.2.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Freeling M., Bertrand-Garcia R., Sinha N. Maize mutants and variants altering developmental time and their heterochronic interactions. Bioessays. 1992 Apr;14(4):227–236. doi: 10.1002/bies.950140405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hemerly A., Engler J. de A., Bergounioux C., Van Montagu M., Engler G., Inzé D., Ferreira P. Dominant negative mutants of the Cdc2 kinase uncouple cell division from iterative plant development. EMBO J. 1995 Aug 15;14(16):3925–3936. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00064.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herr J. M., Jr An analysis of methods for permanently mounting ovules cleared in four-and-a-half type clearing fluids. Stain Technol. 1982 May;57(3):161–169. doi: 10.3109/10520298209066609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kouchi H., Hata S. Isolation and characterization of novel nodulin cDNAs representing genes expressed at early stages of soybean nodule development. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 Apr;238(1-2):106–119. doi: 10.1007/BF00279537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laux T., Mayer K. F., Berger J., Jürgens G. The WUSCHEL gene is required for shoot and floral meristem integrity in Arabidopsis. Development. 1996 Jan;122(1):87–96. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lawson E. J., Poethig R. S. Shoot development in plants: time for a change. Trends Genet. 1995 Jul;11(7):263–268. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89072-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Medford J. I., Behringer F. J., Callos J. D., Feldmann K. A. Normal and Abnormal Development in the Arabidopsis Vegetative Shoot Apex. Plant Cell. 1992 Jun;4(6):631–643. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.6.631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Medford J. I. Vegetative Apical Meristems. Plant Cell. 1992 Sep;4(9):1029–1039. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.9.1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Poethig R. S. Heterochronic mutations affecting shoot development in maize. Genetics. 1988 Aug;119(4):959–973. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.4.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Poethig R. S. Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):923–930. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4983.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Telfer A., Bollman K. M., Poethig R. S. Phase change and the regulation of trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 1997 Feb;124(3):645–654. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.3.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES