Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1984 Jul 28;289(6439):213–216. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6439.213

Doctors' attitudes to risk in difficult clinical decisions: application of decision analysis in hepatobiliary disease.

A Theodossi, D J Spiegelhalter, I G McFarlane, R Williams
PMCID: PMC1442277  PMID: 6430413

Abstract

Twelve doctors with special training in hepatology independently reviewed two to five cases each from a group of seven cases of complicated hepatobiliary problems. A doctor's willingness to take risks to improve his patients' health was quantified by a wagering technique based on the probability of achieving a successful intervention. These probabilities were then used to calculate "utilities," which represented the average opinion of the doctors about the relative worth of each of six predefined states of health. The results showed that, in the context of risky decisions for severely ill patients, a year of life was considered by the doctors to be worth 44% of a full recovery; being mobile for that year increased this value to 57%. Survival for up to five years with restricted mobility was considered to be worth 70% of a full recovery and the ability to work during that period increased this value to 85%. It is concluded that in clinical decision making the uncertainty and preferences implicit in a course of action can be quantified and thus made explicit.

Full text

PDF
213

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Card W. I., Rusinkiewicz M., Phillips C. I. Utility estimation of a set of states of health. Methods Inf Med. 1977 Jul;16(3):168–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Elstein A. S. Clinical judgment: psychological research and medical practice. Science. 1976 Nov 12;194(4266):696–700. doi: 10.1126/science.982034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Langlands A. O., Gore S. M., Kerr G. M. Should adjuvant chemotherapy be withheld from any patient with operable breast cancer? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Sep 11;285(6343):680–682. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6343.680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McNeil B. J., Pauker S. G., Sox H. C., Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259–1262. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McNeil B. J., Weichselbaum R., Pauker S. G. Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1978 Dec 21;299(25):1397–1401. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197812212992506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McNeil B. J., Weichselbaum R., Pauker S. G. Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 22;305(17):982–987. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198110223051704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pauker S. G. Coronary artery surgery: the use of decision analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1976 Jul;85(1):8–18. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-85-1-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pauker S. G., Kassirer J. P. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1980 May 15;302(20):1109–1117. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198005153022003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pauker S. G., McNeil B. J. Impact of patient preferences on the selection of therapy. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34(2-3):77–86. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(81)90053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pauker S. P., Pauker S. G. Prenatal diagnosis: a directive approach to genetic counseling using decision analysis. Yale J Biol Med. 1977 May-Jun;50(3):275–289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sackett D. L., Torrance G. W. The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31(11):697–704. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schwartz W. B., Gorry G. A., Kassirer J. P., Essig A. Decision analysis and clinical judgment. Am J Med. 1973 Oct;55(3):459–472. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(73)90203-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES