Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1984 Nov 17;289(6455):1345–1347. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6455.1345

Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby's condition at birth.

P Curzen, J S Bekir, D G McLintock, M Patel
PMCID: PMC1443593  PMID: 6437542

Abstract

A prospective study of 6825 labours was undertaken to determine the relation between the Apgar scores of the babies at one minute and the cardiotocograph tracing in labour. The sensitivity of an abnormal tracing was 35.2% for babies who needed intermittent positive pressure ventilation and 20.0% for babies who did not but who had Apgar scores of less than 7. The sensitivity of an abnormal tracing for all babies with an Apgar score of less than 7 was 23.2%. The positive predictive value of an abnormal tracing was 8.7% for babies who needed intermittent positive pressure ventilation and 18.7% for babies who did not but who had an Apgar score of less than 7. The positive predictive value of an abnormal tracing was 27.4% for all babies with an Apgar score of less than 7. The specificity of the tracing was 93.4% for babies with an Apgar score of 7 or over. The relatively high incidence of false positive predictions might be explained on the grounds that abnormalities in the cardiotocograph tracing are a more sensitive indicator of hypoxia than the Apgar score. False negative predictions might have been due to adverse factors other than hypoxia--for example, fetal trauma, compression of the head, infection, and analgesia in labour. These findings suggest that the current overdependence on fetal monitoring by cardiotocography alone should be examined and that other reliable indicators for non-hypoxic fetal distress should be sought.

Full text

PDF
1345

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beard R. W., Filshie G. M., Knight C. A., Roberts G. M. The significance of the changes in the continuous fetal heart rate in the first stage of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1971 Oct;78(10):865–881. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1971.tb00198.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haverkamp A. D., Orleans M., Langendoerfer S., McFee J., Murphy J., Thompson H. E. A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jun 15;134(4):399–412. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33082-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haverkamp A. D., Thompson H. E., McFee J. G., Cetrulo C. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Jun 1;125(3):310–320. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90565-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kelso I. M., Parsons R. J., Lawrence G. F., Arora S. S., Edmonds D. K., Cooke I. D. An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jul 1;131(5):526–532. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90114-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Renou P., Chang A., Anderson I., Wood C. Controlled trial of fetal intensive care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Oct 15;126(4):470–476. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90641-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Steer P. Has the expression 'fetal distress' outlived its usefulness? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Sep;89(9):690–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sykes G. S., Molloy P. M., Johnson P., Gu W., Ashworth F., Stirrat G. M., Turnbull A. C. Do Apgar scores indicate asphyxia? Lancet. 1982 Feb 27;1(8270):494–496. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91462-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sykes G. S., Molloy P. M., Johnson P., Stirrat G. M., Turnbull A. C. Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Oct 1;287(6397):943–945. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6397.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES