Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1976 Aug;31(2):225–232.

Biological effects of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vivo. II. Selection in the mouse thymus of PHA- and con A-responsive cells.

L Adorini, L Ruco, S Uccini, G S De Franceschi, C D Baroni, G Doria
PMCID: PMC1445131  PMID: 783042

Abstract

The effect of LPS injection on mouse thymocytes was examined by in vitro stimulation with PHA and Con A. Thymocytes from LPS treated mice were found more responsive than normal thymocytes to PHA and Con A. The increase of responsiveness was different for PHA and Con A, and dependent on the dose of LPS injected. This dose dependency suggests that LPS in vivo modifies the thymocyte population by progressively eliminating T1 cells and selecting T2 cells. These effects seem to be mediated by corticosteroids because they were prevented by adrenalectomy, a finding in agreement with the notion that the injection of cortisone induces similar cell changes in the thymus.

Full text

PDF
225

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison A. C., Davies A. J. Requirement of thymus-dependent lymphocytes for potentiation by adjuvants of antibody formation. Nature. 1971 Oct 1;233(5318):330–332. doi: 10.1038/233330a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson J., Sjöberg O., Möller G. Mitogens as probes for immunocyte activation and cellular cooperation. Transplant Rev. 1972;11:131–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb00048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armerding D., Katz D. H. Activation of T and B lymphocytes in vitro. I. Regulatory influence of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on specific T-cell helper function. J Exp Med. 1974 Jan 1;139(1):24–43. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.1.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baroni C. D., De Franceschi G. S., Uccini S., Adorini L., Cnen G. D., Ruco L. Biological effects of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vivo. I. Selection in the mouse thymus of killer and helper cells. Immunology. 1976 Aug;31(2):217–224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blomgren H., Andersson B. Evidence for a small pool of immunocompetent cells in the mouse thymus. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Oct;57(2):185–192. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90140-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blomgren H., Svedmyr E. In vitro stimulation of mouse thymus cells by PHA and allogeneic cells. Cell Immunol. 1971 Aug;2(4):285–299. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90063-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cantor H., Asofsky R. Synergy among lymphoid cells mediating the graft-versus-host response. 3. Evidence for interaction between two types of thymus-derived cells. J Exp Med. 1972 Apr 1;135(4):764–779. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.4.764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chiller J. M., Weigle W. O. Termination of tolerance to human gamma globulin in mice by antigen and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin). J Exp Med. 1973 Mar 1;137(3):740–750. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.3.740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen J. J., Claman H. N. Thymus-marrow immunocompetence. V. Hydrocortisone-resistant cells and processes in the hemolytic antibody response of mice. J Exp Med. 1971 May 1;133(5):1026–1034. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.5.1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen J. J., Fschbach M., Claman H. N. Hydrocortisne resistance of graft vs host activity in mouse thymus, spleen and bone marrow. J Immunol. 1970 Nov;105(5):1146–1150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen J. J., Patterson C. K. Induction of theta-positive lymphocytes and lymphoblasts in mouse bone marrow by mitogens. J Immunol. 1975 Jan;114(1 Pt 2):374–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. DOUGHERTY T. F. Effect of hormones on lympatic tissue. Physiol Rev. 1952 Oct;32(4):379–401. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1952.32.4.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunn T. B. Normal and pathologic anatomy of the adrenal gland of the mouse, including neoplasms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970 Jun;44(6):1323–1389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Greaves M., Janossy G. Elicitation of selective T and B lymphocyte responses by cell surface binding ligands. Transplant Rev. 1972;11:87–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb00047.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamaoka T., Katz D. H. Cellular site of action of various adjuvants in antibody responses to hapten-carrier conjugates. J Immunol. 1973 Nov;111(5):1554–1563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones J. M., Kind P. D. Enhancing effect of bacterial endotoxins on bone marrow cells in the immune response to SRBC. J Immunol. 1972 May;108(5):1453–1455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kagnoff M. F., Billings P., Cohn M. Functional characteristics of Peyer's patch lymphoid cells. II. Lipopolysaccharide is thymus dependent. J Exp Med. 1974 Feb 1;139(2):407–413. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.2.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kateley J. R., Kasarov L., Friedman H. Modulation of in vivo antibody responses by cholera toxin. J Immunol. 1975 Jan;114(1 Pt 1):81–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Komure K., Goldstein G., Boyse E. A. Thymus-repopulating capacity of cells that can be induced to differentiate to T cells in vitro. J Immunol. 1975 Jul;115(1):195–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Metcalf D., Wiadrowski M. Autoradiographic analysis of lymphocyte proliferation in the thymus and in thymic lymphoma tissue. Cancer Res. 1966 Mar;26(3):483–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Morse S. I., Stearns C. D., Goldsmith S. R. Lymphocyte depletion induced by cholera toxin; relationship to adrenal cortical function. J Immunol. 1975 Feb;114(2 Pt 1):665–670. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Möller G. 19S antibody production against soluble lipopolysaccharide antigens by individual lymphoid cells in vitro. Nature. 1965 Sep 11;207(5002):1166–1168. doi: 10.1038/2071166a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Newburger P. E., Hamaoka T., Katz D. H. Potentiation of helper T cell function in IgE antibody responses by bacterial lipolysaccharide (LPS). J Immunol. 1974 Sep;113(3):824–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Owen J. J., Raff M. C. Studies on the differentiation of thymus-derived lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1970 Dec 1;132(6):1216–1232. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.6.1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. ROWLANDS D. T., Jr, CLAMAN H. N., KIND P. D. THE EFFECT OF ENDOTOXIN ON THE THYMUS OF YOUNG MICE. Am J Pathol. 1965 Feb;46:165–176. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Raff M. Evidence for subpopulation of mature lymphocytes within mouse thymus. Nat New Biol. 1971 Feb 10;229(6):182–184. doi: 10.1038/newbio229182a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rudbach J. A. Molecular immunogenicity of bacterial lipopolysaccharide antigens: establishing a quantitative system. J Immunol. 1971 Apr;106(4):993–1001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmidtke J. R., Dixon F. J. Immune response to a hapten coupled to a nonimmunogenic carrier. Influence of lipopolysaccharide. J Exp Med. 1972 Aug 1;136(2):392–397. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.2.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmidtke J. R., Najarian J. S. Synergistic effects on DNA synthesis of phytohemagglutinin or concanavalin A and lipopolysaccharide in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1975 Feb;114(2 Pt 2):742–746. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shortman K., Jackson H. The differentiation of T lymphocytes. I. Proliferation kinetics and interrelationships of subpopulations of mouse thymus cells. Cell Immunol. 1974 May;12(2):230–246. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(74)90075-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Skidmore B. J., Chiller J. M., Morrison D. C., Weigle W. O. Immunologic properties of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS): correlation between the mitogenic, adjuvant, and immunogenic activities. J Immunol. 1975 Feb;114(2 Pt 2):770–775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spitznagel J. K., Allison A. C. Mode of action of adjuvants: retinol and other lysosome-labilizing agents as adjuvants. J Immunol. 1970 Jan;104(1):119–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stobo J. D., Paul W. E. Functional heterogeneity of murine lymphoid cells. 3. Differential responsiveness of T cells to phytohemagglutinin and concanavalin A as a probe for T cell subsets. J Immunol. 1973 Feb;110(2):362–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stobo J. D., Rosenthal A. S., Paul W. E. Functional heterogeneity of murine lymphoid cells. I. Responsiveness to and surface binding of concanavalin A and phytohemagglutinin. J Immunol. 1972 Jan;108(1):1–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. WARNER N. L. THE IMMUNOLOGICAL ROLE OF DIFFERENT LYMPHOID ORGANS IN THE CHICKEN. II. THE IMMUNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF THYMIC CELL SUSPENSIONS. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:401–416. doi: 10.1038/icb.1964.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES