Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1976 Dec;31(6):943–951.

Analysis of immunosuppression generated by the graft-versus-host reaction. II. Characterization of the suppression cell and its mechanism of action.

F L Shand
PMCID: PMC1445189  PMID: 11181

Abstract

Spleen cells from (CBA X C57/BL) F1 mice undergoing graft-versus-host (GVH) reaction induced by injection of parental cells 7-14 days previously are capable of suppressing an immune response by normal or primed F1 spleen cells to chicken erythrocytes and levan in vivo and sheep erythrocytes in vitro. The cells in these GVH spleens which were responsible for the suppression were sensitive to treatment with anti-0 serum, resistant to 900 rad irradiation in vivo and not retained by anti-immunoglobulin columns. Suppressor activity in vitro was present only in the non-adherent fraction of these GVH cell suspensions. Furthermore, the T-cell fraction, purified by affinity chromatography, suppressed the in vitro response of macrophage-depleted normal F1 cells to DNP-levan. Collectively, these observations imply that suppressor T cells generated by GVH reaction can affect B-cell functions directly without intermediary macrophage participation. Spleen cells from (CBA X C57/BL) F1 mice undergoing GVH reaction induced by C57/BL cells were depleted of their F1 content by treatment with anti-CBA alloantiserum. The suppressive activity of the residual donor component was still expressed against other F1 cells (AKR X C57/BL) which were H-2 compatible with the original host, but not against H-2-incompatible cells (DBA/1 X C57/BL) F1. However, the latter were suppressed in the presence of (CBA X C57/BL) F1 cells. Thus, interaction of donor T cells with F1 target cells containing those H-2 antigens towards which they are sensitized is mandatory for the subsequent manifestation of immunosuppressive activity. GVH cells suppressed the response of primed F1 cells in double Marbrook chambers when the two populations were separated were by a cell-impermeable membrane, provided the GVH suspension contained F1 cells to which donor T cells were sensitized. This suggests that soluble factors are involved in the mechanism of GVH-induced immunosuppression.

Full text

PDF
943

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell E. B., Shand F. L. A search for lymphocyte-derived macrophages during xenogeneic graft-verus-host reactions induced by rat thoracic duct cells. Immunology. 1972 Apr;22(4):537–547. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Byfield P., Christie G. H., Howard J. G. Alternative potentiating and inhibitory effects of GVH reaction on formation of antibodies against a thymus-independent polysaccharide (S3). J Immunol. 1973 Jul;111(1):72–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cunningham A. J., Szenberg A. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):599–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Desaymard C., Feldmann M. Lack of requirement for cell cooperation in the antibody response to DNP conjugated to levan. Cell Immunol. 1975 Mar;16(1):106–114. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(75)90189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dutton R. W. Inhibitory and stimulatory effects of concanavalin A on the response of mouse spleen cell suspensions to antigen. I. Characterization of the inhibitory cell activity. J Exp Med. 1972 Dec 1;136(6):1445–1460. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.6.1445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elie R., Lapp W. S. Graft-versus-host induced immunosuppression: depressed T cell helper function in vitro. Cell Immunol. 1976 Jan;21(1):31–39. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90324-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans G., Ivanyi J. Antibody synthesis by chicken spleen cells in vitro. I. Requirements of B cells at various stages after immunization for T cells, macrophages and antigen. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Nov;5(11):747–752. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830051104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FOX M. Cytological estimation of the proportion of proliferating donor cells during graft-versus-host disease in F1 hybrid mice infected with parental spleen cells. Nature. 1962 Sep 8;195:1024–1025. doi: 10.1038/1951024a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feldmann M., Beverley P. C., Dunkley M., Kontiainen S. Different Ly antigen phenotypes of in vitro induced helper and suppressor cells. Nature. 1975 Dec 18;258(5536):614–616. doi: 10.1038/258614a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldmann M. Cell interactions in the immune response in vitro. V. Specific collaboration via complexes of antigen and thymus-derived cell immunoglobulin. J Exp Med. 1972 Oct 1;136(4):737–760. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.4.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fitch F. W., Engers H. D., Cerottini J. C., Bruner K. T. Generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vitro. VII. Suppressive effect of irradiated MLC cells on CTL response. J Immunol. 1976 Mar;116(3):716–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gershon R. K., Kondo K. Cell interactions in the induction of tolerance: the role of thymic lymphocytes. Immunology. 1970 May;18(5):723–737. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katz D. H., Benacerraf B. The regulatory influence of activated T cells on B cell responses to antigen. Adv Immunol. 1972;15:1–94. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60683-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lapp W. S., Wechsler A., Kongshavn P. A. Immune restoration of mice immunosuppressed by a graft-vs.-host reaction. Cell Immunol. 1974 Mar 30;11(1-3):419–426. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(74)90040-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lawrence W., Jr, Simonsen M. The property of "strength" of histocompatibility antigens, and their ability to produce antigenic competition. Transplantation. 1967 Sep 5;5(5):1304–1322. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196709000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ly I. A., Mishell R. I. Separation of mouse spleen cells by passage through columns of sephadex G-10. J Immunol Methods. 1974 Aug;5(3):239–247. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(74)90108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marbrook J. Primary immune response in cultures of spleen cells. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1279–1281. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90393-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McMaster R., Levy J. G. Immunosuppression of normal lymphoid cells by serum from mice undergoing chronic graft-vs-host disease. J Immunol. 1975 Nov;115(5):1400–1403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miranda J. J. Studies on immunological paralysis. IX. The immunogenicity and tolerogenicity of levan (polyfructose) in mice. Immunology. 1972 Dec;23(6):829–842. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Möller G. Suppressive effect of graft versus host reactions on the immune response to heterologous red cells. Immunology. 1971 Apr;20(4):597–609. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nelson D. S. Production by stimulated macrophages of factors depressing lymphocyte transformation. Nature. 1973 Nov 30;246(5431):306–307. doi: 10.1038/246306a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Parthenais E., Elie R., Lapp W. S. Soluble factors and the immune response: in vitro studies of the immunosuppression induced by the graft-versus-host reaction. Cell Immunol. 1974 Jul;13(1):164–168. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(74)90235-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Phillips S. M., Gleichmann H., Hirsch M. S., Black P., Merrill J. P., Schwartz R. S., Carpenter C. B. Cellular immunity in the mouse. IV. Altered thymic-dependent lymphocyte reactivity in the chronic graft vs host reaction and leukemia virus activation. Cell Immunol. 1975 Jan;15(1):152–168. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(75)90172-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shand F. L. Analysis of immunosuppression generated by the graft-versus-host reaction. I. A suppressor T-cell component studied in vivo. Immunology. 1975 Dec;29(6):953–965. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sjöberg O. Effect of allogeneic cell interaction on the primary immune response in vitro. Cell types involved in suppression and stimulation of antibody synthesis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1972 Nov;12(3):365–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sprent J., Anderson R. E., Miller J. F. Radiosensitivity of T and B lymphocytes. II. Effect of irradiation on response of T cells to alloantigens. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Mar;4(3):204–210. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wigzell H., Sundqvist K. G., Yoshida T. O. Separation of cells according to surface antigens by the use of antibody-coated columns. Fractionation of cells carrying immunoglobulins and blood group antigen. Scand J Immunol. 1972;1(1):75–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1972.tb03737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES